Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gospel According to the Church Fathers
The Cripplegate ^ | September 22, 2011 | Nathan Busenitz

Posted on 01/24/2015 8:33:46 AM PST by RnMomof7

After the apostles died, was the gospel hopelessly lost until the Reformation?

That certainly seems to be a common assumption in some Protestant circles today. Thankfully, it is a false assumption.

I’m not entirely sure where that misconception started. But one thing I do know: it did not come from the Protestant Reformers.

The Reformers themselves (including Luther, Zwingli, Calvin, and others) were convinced that their position was not only biblical, but also historical. In other words, they contended that both the apostles and the church fathers would have agreed with them on the heart of the gospel.

For example, the second-generation Lutheran reformer, Martin Chemnitz (1522-1586), wrote a treatise on justification in which he defended the Protestant position by extensively using the church fathers. And John Calvin (1509-1564), in his Institutes, similarly claimed that he could easily debunk his Roman Catholic opponents using nothing but patristic sources. Here’s what he wrote:

If the contest were to be determined by patristic authority, the tide of victory — to put it very modestly —would turn to our side. Now, these fathers have written many wise and excellent things.  . . . [Yet] the good things that these fathers have written they [the Roman Catholics] either do not notice, or misrepresent or pervert.  . . .  But we do not despise them [the church fathers]; in fact, if it were to our present purpose, I could with no trouble at all prove that the greater part of what we are saying today meets their approval.

Source: John Calvin, “Prefatory Address to King Francis I of France,” The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Section 4.

How could the Reformers be so confident that their understanding of the gospel was consistent with the teachings of the ancient church? Or perhaps more to the point: What did the early church fathers have to say about the gospel of grace?

Here is an admittedly brief collection of 30 patristic quotes, centering on the reality that justification is by grace alone through faith alone. Many more could be provided. But I think you’ll be encouraged by this survey look at the gospel according to the church fathers.

(Even if you don’t read every quote, just take a moment to consider the fact that, long before Luther, the leaders of the ancient church were clearly proclaiming the gospel of grace through faith in Christ.)

1. Clement of Rome (30-100): “And we, too, being called by His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified by ourselves, nor by our own wisdom, or understanding, or godliness, or works which we have wrought in holiness of heart; but by that faith through which, from the beginning, Almighty God has justified all men; to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.”

Source: Clement, First Epistle to the Corinthians, 32.4.

2. Epistle to Diognetus (second century): “He gave His own Son as a ransom for us, the holy One for transgressors, the blameless One for the wicked, the righteous One for the unrighteous, the incorruptible One for the corruptible, the immortal One for them that are mortal. For what other thing was capable of covering our sins than His righteousness? By what other one was it possible that we, the wicked and ungodly, could be justified, than by the only Son of God? O sweet exchange! O unsearchable operation! O benefits surpassing all expectation! That the wickedness of many should be hid in a single righteous One, and that the righteousness of One should justify many transgressors!”

Source: The Epistle to Diognetus, 9.2-5.

3. Justin Martyr (100-165) speaks of “those who repented, and who no longer were purified by the blood of goats and of sheep, or by the ashes of an heifer, or by the offerings of fine flour, but by faith through the blood of Christ, and through His death.”

Source: Justin, Dialogue with Trypho, 13.

4. Origen (185-254): “For God is just, and therefore he could not justify the unjust. Therefore he required the intervention of a propitiator, so that by having faith in Him those who could not be justified by their own works might be justified.”

Source: Origen, Commentary on Romans, 2.112.

5. Origen (again): “A man is justified by faith. The works of the law can make no contribution to this. Where there is no faith which might justify the believer, even if there are works of the law these are not based on the foundation of faith. Even if they are good in themselves they cannot justify the one who does them, because faith is lacking, and faith is the mark of those who are justified by God.”

Source: Origen, Commentary on Romans, 2.136.

6. Hilary of Poitiers (300-368): “Wages cannot be considered as a gift, because they are due to work, but God has given free grace to all men by the justification of faith.”

Source: Hilary, Commentary on Matthew (on Matt. 20:7)

7. Hilary of Poitiers (again): “It disturbed the scribes that sin was forgiven by a man (for they considered that Jesus Christ was only a man) and that sin was forgiven by Him whereas the Law was not able to absolve it, since faith alone justifies.”

Source: Hilary, Commentary on Matthew (on Matt. 9:3)

8. Didymus the Blind (c. 313-398) “A person is saved by grace, not by works but by faith. There should be no doubt but that faith saves and then lives by doing its own works, so that the works which are added to salvation by faith are not those of the law but a different kind of thing altogether.”[31]

Source: Didymus the Blind. Commentary on James, 2:26b.

9. Basil of Caesarea (329-379): “Let him who boasts boast in the Lord, that Christ has been made by God for us righteousness, wisdom, justification, redemption. This is perfect and pure boasting in God, when one is not proud on account of his own righteousness but knows that he is indeed unworthy of the true righteousness and is justified solely by faith in Christ.”

Source: Basil, Homily on Humility, 20.3.

10. Jerome (347–420): “We are saved by grace rather than works, for we can give God nothing in return for what he has bestowed on us.”

Source: Jerome, Epistle to the Ephesians, 1.2.1.

11. John Chrysostom (349-407): “For Scripture says that faith has saved us. Put better: Since God willed it, faith has saved us. Now in what case, tell me, does faith save without itself doing anything at all? Faith’s workings themselves are a gift of God, lest anyone should boast. What then is Paul saying? Not that God has forbidden works but that he has forbidden us to be justified by works. No one, Paul says, is justified by works, precisely in order that the grace and benevolence of God may become apparent.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on Ephesians, 4.2.9.

12. John Chrysostom (again): “But what is the ‘law of faith?’ It is, being saved by grace. Here he shows God’s power, in that He has not only saved, but has even justified, and led them to boasting, and this too without needing works, but looking for faith only.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on Romans, 7.27.

13. John Chrysostom (again): “God allowed his Son to suffer as if a condemned sinner, so that we might be delivered from the penalty of our sins. This is God’s righteousness, that we are not justified by works (for then they would have to be perfect, which is impossible), but by grace, in which case all our sin is removed.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Epistles of Paul to the Corinthians, 11.5.

14. John Chrysostom (again): “Everywhere he puts the Gentiles upon a thorough equality. ‘And put no difference between us and them, having purified their hearts by faith.’ (v. 9.) From faith alone, he says, they obtained the same gifts. This is also meant as a lesson to those (objectors); this is able to teach even them that faith only is needed, not works nor circumcision.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on Acts, 32 (regarding Acts 15:1)

15. John Chrysostom (again): “What then was it that was thought incredible? That those who were enemies, and sinners, neither justified by the law, nor by works, should immediately through faith alone be advanced to the highest favor. Upon this head accordingly Paul has discoursed at length in his Epistle to the Romans, and here again at length. “This is a faithful saying,” he says, “and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on 1 Timothy, 4.1.

16. John Chrysostom (again): “”For it is most of all apparent among the Gentiles, as he also says elsewhere, ‘And that the Gentiles might glorify God for His mercy.’ (Romans 15:9.) For the great glory of this mystery is apparent among others also, but much more among these. For, on a sudden, to have brought men more senseless than stones to the dignity of Angels, simply through bare words, and faith alone, without any laboriousness, is indeed glory and riches of mystery: just as if one were to take a dog, quite consumed with hunger and the mange, foul, and loathsome to see, and not so much as able to move, but lying cast out, and make him all at once into a man, and to display him upon the royal throne.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on Colossians, 5.2.

17. John Chrysostom (again): “Now since the Jews kept turning over and over the fact, that the Patriarch, and friend of God, was the first to receive circumcision, he wishes to show, that it was by faith that he too was justified. And this was quite a vantage ground to insist upon. For a person who had no works, to be justified by faith, was nothing unlikely. But for a person richly adorned with good deeds, not to be made just from hence, but from faith, this is the thing to cause wonder, and to set the power of faith in a strong light.”

Source: John Chrysostom, Homilies on Romans, 8.1.

18. Augustine (354-430): “If Abraham was not justified by works, how was he justified? The apostle goes on to tell us how: What does scripture say? (that is, about how Abraham was justified). Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness (Rom. 4:3; Gen. 15:6). Abraham, then, was justified by faith. Paul and James do not contradict each other: good works follow justification.”

Source: Augustine, Exposition 2 of Psalm 31, 2-4.

19. Augustine (again): “When someone believes in him who justifies the impious, that faith is reckoned as justice to the believer, as David too declares that person blessed whom God has accepted and endowed with righteousness, independently of any righteous actions (Rom 4:5-6). What righteousness is this? The righteousness of faith, preceded by no good works, but with good works as its consequence.”

Source: Augustine, Exposition 2 of Psalm 31, 6-7.

20. Ambrosiaster (fourth century): “God has decreed that a person who believes in Christ can be saved without works. By faith alone he receives the forgiveness of sins.”

Source: Ambrosiaster, Commentary on 1 Corinthians 1:4.

21. Ambrosiaster (again): “They are justified freely because they have not done anything nor given anything in return, but by faith alone they have been made holy by the gift of God.”

Source: Ambrosiaster, Commentary on Romans 3:24.

22. Ambrosiaster (again): “Paul tells those who live under the law that they have no reason to boast basing themselves on the law and claiming to be of the race of Abraham, seeing that no one is justified before God except by faith.”

Source: Ambrosiaster, Commentary on Romans 3:27.

23. Ambrosiaster (again): “God gave what he promised in order to be revealed as righteous. For he had promised that he would justify those who believe in Christ, as he says in Habakkuk: ‘The righteous will live by faith in me’ (Hab. 2:4). Whoever has faith in God and Christ is righteous.”

Source: Ambrosiaster, Commentary on Paul’s Epistles; CSEL 81 ad loc.

24. Marius Victorinus (fourth century): “The fact that you Ephesians are saved is not something that comes from yourselves. It is the gift of God. It is not from your works, but it is God’s grace and God’s gift, not from anything you have deserved. … We did not receive things by our own merit but by the grace and goodness of God.”

Source: Marius Victorinus, Epistle to the Ephesians, 1.2.9.

25. Prosper of Aquitaine (390–455): “And just as there are no crimes so detestable that they can prevent the gift of grace, so too there can be no works so eminent that they are owed in condign [deserved] judgment that which is given freely. Would it not be a debasement of redemption in Christ’s blood, and would not God’s mercy be made secondary to human works, if justification, which is through grace, were owed in view of preceding merits, so that it were not the gift of a Donor, but the wages of a laborer?”

Source: Prosper of Acquitaine, Call of All Nations, 1.17

26. Theodoret of Cyrus (393–457): “The Lord Christ is both God and the mercy seat, both the priest and the lamb, and he performed the work of our salvation by his blood, demanding only faith from us.”

Source: Theodoret of Cyrus, Interpretation of the Letter to the Romans; PG 82 ad loc.

27. Theodoret of Cyrus (again): “All we bring to grace is our faith. But even in this faith, divine grace itself has become our enabler. For [Paul] adds, ‘And this is not of yourselves but it is a gift of God; not of works, lest anyone should boast’ (Eph. 2:8–9). It is not of our own accord that we have believed, but we have come to belief after having been called; and even when we had come to believe, He did not require of us purity of life, but approving mere faith, God bestowed on us forgiveness of sins”

Source: Theodoret of Cyrus, Interpretation of the Fourteen Epistles of Paul; FEF 3:248–49, sec. 2163.

28. Cyril of Alexandria (412-444): “For we are justified by faith, not by works of the law, as Scripture says. By faith in whom, then, are we justified? Is it not in Him who suffered death according to the flesh for our sake? Is it not in one Lord Jesus Christ?”

 Source: Cyril of Alexandria, Against Nestorius, 3.62

29. Fulgentius (462–533): “The blessed Paul argues that we are saved by faith, which he declares to be not from us but a gift from God. Thus there cannot possibly be true salvation where there is no true faith, and, since this faith is divinely enabled, it is without doubt bestowed by his free generosity. Where there is true belief through true faith, true salvation certainly accompanies it. Anyone who departs from true faith will not possess the grace of true salvation.”

Source: Fulgentius, On the Incarnation, 1; CCL 91:313.

30.  Bede (673-735): “Although the apostle Paul preached that we are justified by faith without works, those who understand by this that it does not matter whether they live evil lives or do wicked and terrible things, as long as they believe in Christ, because salvation is through faith, have made a great mistake. James here expounds how Paul’s words ought to be understood. This is why he uses the example of Abraham, whom Paul also used as an example of faith, to show that the patriarch also performed good works in the light of his faith. It is therefore wrong to interpret Paul in such a way as to suggest that it did not matter whether Abraham put his faith into practice or not. What Paul meant was that no one obtains the gift of justification on the basis of merits derived from works performed beforehand, because the gift of justification comes only from faith.”

Source: Cited from the Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture (ed. Gerald Bray), NT, vol. 11, p. 31.


TOPICS: Apologetics; History; Mainline Protestant; Theology
KEYWORDS: gospel; history; scripture; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-382 next last
To: Salvation

Indeed. I haven’t seen such a magnificent straw man set up since Burning Man in the desert. And look how easily he gets knocked down!


41 posted on 01/24/2015 10:23:11 AM PST by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; metmom
I built no straw men. What you consider gives me or doesn’t me credibility is as irrelevant as most of your comments are.

LOL, all kneel to the Pope of the Church of Scathing Contempt.

Be castigated in the name of the love of Christ, worms!

And remember, you will be told whether an answer is an answer or a comment, and whether a statement has been contradicted or not. For it is highly irritating to "Him Who Be All That," for worms to squeek what they believe are opinions about topics they have not been certified to opine upon.

Let It Be Written, Let It Be Done!

Bwahahaha!

42 posted on 01/24/2015 10:26:03 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

YEP...CB..they have never been taught the gospel so they do not know it


43 posted on 01/24/2015 10:32:38 AM PST by RnMomof7 (Ga 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Look it up yourself. Anti-Catholics here have made the claim themselves.

Nope. You make the claim, you back it up or no one is obligated to take it seriously.

This business of making a claim and then sending people off to do your work for you is a bunch of nonsense. If you can't be bothered to support your own contentions, then they're obviously not worth the time and effort for anyone else to either.

44 posted on 01/24/2015 10:36:24 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Greetings_Puny_Humans

Thanks


45 posted on 01/24/2015 10:48:43 AM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

What deceit.

The enemy sure has people where he wants them, trusting in someone, anyone, any thing other than Jesus.


46 posted on 01/24/2015 10:50:20 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

I had never heard anything like that either. I have been to many denominations over my 71 years.


47 posted on 01/24/2015 10:52:48 AM PST by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

What was the gospel that Jesus preached ?


48 posted on 01/24/2015 10:53:17 AM PST by RnMomof7 (Ga 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Good post and data. By the sources you posted one could conclude their definition of salvation is by good works and the rosary.


49 posted on 01/24/2015 10:53:59 AM PST by redleghunter (Your faith has saved you. Go in peace. (Luke 7:50))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter

“I did read the entire piece.”

Then why did you ask what the purpose was?

“The point is one can address error without waiting to the final few paragraphs.”

Oh, so that’s the point, and not: “And today in the 21st century a Catholic mystic site keeps her testimony next to others they uphold?”

“The message is no doubt that she gave a bad name to mystics having the same or similar experiences.”

Is that the message? Again, DID YOU ACTUAL READ WHAT WAS AT THE BOTTOM?


50 posted on 01/24/2015 11:00:12 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the ping. Faith versus works is ancient argument. I think the answer is both faith and works in that order. The writings of the early church fathers are interesting, but not as important as the Gospels. I do not believe the Gospels were lost between 100 AD and Martin Luther, but certainly a great deal was added that isn’t in the Gospels.


51 posted on 01/24/2015 11:03:07 AM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

“... because the apostles didn’t teach about the assumption of Mary!”

No, first you would have to prove they didn’t. Second, you would have to prove that the assumption had happened already by the time Galatians was written. Many think it did not. Third, you would have to prove the assumption itself rather than the authority to teach it is part of the Gospel.

Get back to me when you’ve proved all three.


52 posted on 01/24/2015 11:03:27 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Quote- Compare this with the Church Fathers above, who place salvation not into the hands of Mary or the rosary, but in Christ alone.

But the problem is that Mary points to Jesus ...

Maybe the Mary with rosary and her 15 promises for praying rosary is a liar?

And the Greco Roman Latin Jesus is also a fraud..and the Catholic mother and daughters do not have a different Jesus..

Certainly December 25, good Friday and easter Sunday are christian days not just based on the catholic Jesus and their Mary..

And faith in a counterfeit is just as false, whether you call yourself a catholic or a protestant..


53 posted on 01/24/2015 11:04:01 AM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

What I posted was true. An anti-Catholic’s irrelevant opinions and posts are irrelevant. Your view doesn’t change that fact.


54 posted on 01/24/2015 11:04:47 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: metmom

“Nope. You make the claim, you back it up or no one is obligated to take it seriously.”

Do you know how to use google?


55 posted on 01/24/2015 11:06:14 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

“What was the gospel that Jesus preached ?”

Are you saying you don’t know?


56 posted on 01/24/2015 11:08:03 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
I don't have to prove anything. It's Catholics who have to prove that they did teach the assumption. I have to simply go by what I know they did teach and consider anyone who teaches something they didn't to be accursed. The only sure reference we have to what the apostles taught is what was written by them. The assumption of Mary wasn't even spoken of until at least the fourth century by the Catholic Church's own admission. See here..

The teaching is part of another gospel and as such is considered accursed by God.

57 posted on 01/24/2015 11:11:44 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; RnMomof7
>>Are you saying you don’t know?<<

Are Catholics saying they can't back up what they say with documentation?

58 posted on 01/24/2015 11:18:07 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

If it’s not found in Scripture it is not binding on believers.

The assumption of Mary, along with the immaculate conception, her perpetual virginity, and a whole host of other claims about her are found nowhere in Scripture.

Therefore, the burden of proof that they are true is on those claiming they are truth.

It’s completely bogus to demand that people accept every statement made by the Catholic church as true because they said so and nobody has proved them wrong.

Reality is, until someone can prove from God breathed, Holy Spirit inspired Scripture that something is true, nobody is bound to it in the least.

It can be dismissed as the refuse that it is.


59 posted on 01/24/2015 11:34:12 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
You guys relentlessly pick and choose the passages from the Fathers you think support your position. You don't, for example, cite Augustine when he says that it is a sin *not* to adore the consecrated Host. You don't quote Augustine in some of his more florid prayers to Mary.

"Salvation by faith" is totally scriptural, and is Catholic dogma. "Salvation by faith *ALONE*", if you define "saving faith" as Luther did, is neither.

60 posted on 01/24/2015 11:34:22 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-382 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson