So?
Previously you were mixing the two together in the same sentence...
Now, after your other argumentation having failed, you switch to this tack.
This is the very kind of thing which makes any kind of interaction with yourself -- beyond extremely tedious - to flat out infuriating.
But now I have to nail down yet more squirminess and squiggling?
What original is that? (I'm smelling both desperation -- and being set up for trickery!)
Do you have the autographs at home in a desk drawer? No?
The I must ask (again) -- WHAT "original" text are you speaking of now?
It cannot be the Latin Vulgate, for that is but a translation itself.
I already have. Issues of canon, and how that has subtly changed to allow in full canonical status for Apocrypha, is simply an unavoidable issue in this context. That aspect alone falsifies the above statement.
Now for things like this which you posted here;
require more than just vague assignment of those snippets be allegedly from "Gen:3;15".
What sources are you copying those from, huh?
Show your work. Show your sources. Provide links to those -- if you really want to drag this off into Greek and Hebrew 'bushes'.
So the TRUE church, started by JESUS CHRIST himself, and GUIDED by the Holy Spirit, makes ...
What ELSE have you guys SCREWED UP?
(Other than the seven churches in Asia that you absolutely REFUSE to address on FR!!)