vlad, you and I see things differently. You and I are discussing two different understandings of who Jesus is.
Until you become born again of the Spirit, you simply cannot know where I’m coming from in these posts on FR.
Not being an RC, I well understand your implacable position as a defender on FR of all things Roman Catholic, regardless whether your explanations make sense or not.
I also know your demonstrations of what you ascribe as truth has not always been compatible or in line with the Holy Bible except via your own (RCC) private interpretations...as is the case with all (Christian) cults.
Time for you and me to break it off on FR?
Past...
“vlad, you and I see things differently. You and I are discussing two different understandings of who Jesus is.”
Yes, I have the orthodox understanding.
“Until you become born again of the Spirit, you simply cannot know where I’m coming from in these posts on FR.”
Either way you slice it I’m born again in the Spirit. Where you’re “coming from” - based on what you write is a Protestant viewpoint. It’s well known and dates back to the 16th century. It has no connection with Christ, the Apostles, or an orthodox interpretation of scripture.
“Not being an RC, I well understand your implacable position as a defender on FR of all things Roman Catholic, regardless whether your explanations make sense or not.”
That’s not even being a logical statement.
“I also know your demonstrations of what you ascribe as truth has not always been compatible or in line with the Holy Bible except via your own (RCC) private interpretations...as is the case with all (Christian) cults.”
Actually everything I post is in line with an orthodox interpretation of scripture. I never rely on Protestant interpretations.
“Time for you and me to break it off on FR?”
Running away?