Now who has "normalcy bias"? One is a spiritual Law. The other concerned itself with material things - meats, drinks, sacrifices and washings. Even following it down to the last jot and tittle was in vain for Heb. 8:19 tells us it made nothing perfect. It has no bearing on salvation whatsoever. Again, look at it from Gods viewpoint. You won't have an earthly body in Heaven. No real need for food to sustain you. No real need for washings because of the lack of bacteria that couldn't affect your spiritual body anyways. The spiritual Law is forever. The other . . not so much. Eph 2:15, Col. 2:14
My bedtime. Warden said “lights out”. Gotta go.
ALL of Torah has a physical and a spiritual aspect.
Even following it down to the last jot and tittle was in vain for Heb. 8:19 tells us it made nothing perfect.
Study Torah and you will find that is not it's purpose, and never was.
It has no bearing on salvation whatsoever.
And it never has.
Again, look at it from Gods viewpoint. You won't have an earthly body in Heaven. No real need for food to sustain you. No real need for washings because of the lack of bacteria that couldn't affect your spiritual body anyways. The spiritual Law is forever. The other . . not so much. Eph 2:15, Col. 2:14
I think you are making assumptions that are not in evidence. And if you care to study the matter, you will find that we are not going to heaven. Heaven is coming here. YHWH made the earth to be inhabited. Do you think He failed in that endeavor?
See, that's the problem with ignoring the front of the Book. One loses track of intent. What was said in the beginning will be in the end. Doesn't that kinda make the beginning important? But then, I guess that's how folks get to where they cannot see the stunning malfeasance of christmas, easter, and haloween (among many others)... How they can claim ten Commandments and in the same breath, not keep Sabbath (which is the most powerfully evident of all YHWH's moedim), which is explicitly defined within the ten...