Posted on 12/11/2014 3:45:08 AM PST by rhema
May I make two requests? Love me, but remember that you cannot be more merciful than God. It isnt mercy to affirm same-sex acts as good. Dont compromise truth; help me to live in harmony with it.
Over thirty years have passed since same-sex attraction rushed up from deep within my twelve-year-old frame. This attraction was unbidden and unwanted, yet simultaneously forceful and compelling.
As a Christian, the conflict between my sexuality and my faith would become the deepest and most intense of my life. Now in my forties, Ive gone from being closeted to openly lesbian to celibate to heterosexually married. The fact that I need to qualify my marital union as a heterosexual one reveals how much the cultural landscape has changed in that timejust as much as my own personal landscape has, though in very different ways.
During my upbringing, I heard a few fiery sermons on homosexuality. These days, I hear declarations of love instead. They make me shout for joy. Amen! It always should have been so! At the same time, however, many pastors have begun accompanying this love with an eschewal of Biblical sexual morality as oppressive, unreasonable, or unkind. Hence, loving homosexual persons also comes to entail affirming and encouraging them in same-sex sexual relationships and behaviors.
Although I appreciate the desire to act in love, this isnt the genuine love that people like me need. Love me better than that! Thomas Aquinas scholar Josef Pieper put it this way:
love is not synonymous with undifferentiated approval of everything the beloved person thinks and does in real life. . . . [nor is it] the wish for the beloved to feel good always and in every situation and for him to be spared experiencing pain or grief in all circumstances.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepublicdiscourse.com ...
>>So, ANYTHING other than heterosexuality is a CHOICE.
Aucontraire - reproductive dysfunctions such as XXY and Androgen insensitivity syndrome are as natural as... cancer.
http://www.google.com/#q=xxy+androgen+insensitivity
But evidently that’s not recognized as a problem, historically, until the drones have taken over the hive.
What is the order of precedence described in Romans 1:25+?
Because of what?
Gave them over to what?
Evidently the proliferation of homosexual perversion is a natural punitive response to something else.
>>Reproductive dysfunctions aren’t normal,
What percentage of bees in a hive are reproductively normal?
That seems to be a model the Transhumanist Postgenderists have envied for a long time.
Just ask the Pharaohs and the Eunuchs who propped them up. Or was it the Eunuchs and the Pharaohs who propped them up...
Either way, Same ol’
You know, I think we’ll just have to ‘agree to disagree’, on this argument.
There are better ways to spend the Holiday Season; such as communing with God, instead of arguing about Him.
I wish all the best to you and yours for the Christmas Season, and for the New Year.
-JT
>>You KNOW what I meant.
I KNOW that, according to Romans 1:25+, the proliferation of homosexual perversion is a punitive natural response from the Creator.
So the question becomes - what “created things” has Western “culture” taken to idolizing to warrant such a response?
There is no god but the Czar...NOT.
God bless you and yours.
>>But will we OBEY our Heavenly Father?
Or be forgiven when its our nature not to?
But what the homosexuals whove concocted various religious entities have done is that they have perverted forgiveness of sin into permission to sin.
Isa 5:20-21
20 Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter.21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes
and clever in their own sight.
NIV
The state-establishing ceaSARean underwear woven by the eunuchs has always been clever.
Just ask NebuchadnezZAR.
There is nothing new under the Sun... prince - and there is no god but the tZAR....NOT
>>Homosexual perversion is NOT a NATURAL punitive
>>response to something else. It’s a GOD GIVEN PUNISHMENT
God created Nature - so it is BOTH a natural punitive response, and a God given punishment.
>>God bless you and yours.
He always has.
Every worker in the colony is capable of laying eggs - but, in a healthy colony, they don't.
Evidently pheromones from viable brood and/or an active queen keeps worker bees from laying eggs. If a colony loses its queen, and there is no viable brood from which to raise another queen, then the worker bees, no longer suppressed by pheromones, will begin laying eggs.
Laying workers, not having been raised into queens with royal jelly, and being unmated, lack the chromosomes required for the eggs they lay to become anything but drones - and thus, being unable to create another queen (or even workers), drones is all they will produce. A colony with nothing but drones is breathing its last breaths and ultimately dies as the drones take flight in a last effort to preserve the remnants of the hive's genetics.
It's a remarkably beautiful creation; but as far as I can tell, the reproductive nature of bees, complicated as is it, is not documented in the Bible. Instead we've evidently been left to observe and figure it out... with our minds, Created free.
Who is to say the Creator didn't naturally endow/encumber His Human creatures with a similar mechanism that becomes manifested when the hive loses its moral, Godly, non-temporal, focal structure?
What would it look like if a fallen human hive itself became the object of worship therein? Nebuchadnezzar's ( Nebuchadnezzar being the Luciferian fallen star of Isaiah 13) drones knew the answer to that - and the Old Testament names what they created as "Ba'al".
Same Ol' Delphinian manure, different municipal toilet.
>>lack the chromosomes required for the eggs they lay
More accurately said as... “lay nothing but unfertilized eggs which can only become drones”.
ALWAYS?
My, you are unique in this world. Not too many people can say that, as, into each life a "little rain" must always fall. Perhaps you believe that problems, troubles, etc., are blessings-in-disguise. However, I don't want to put words into your mouth, so to speak.
You must be VERY, very, very special. But I can see that you are.
I’m not sure how heterosexuality can be found to be or not be in genes; but your post is interesting to me.
From everything that I have observed and read, there are NO completely homosexual animals, except for man, if the animal is healthy and its social system normal.
But animals sometimes exhibit bisexual behavior, or strange displacements of the sexual urge - not always, but usually, when something has gone wrong with their social system. But healthy animals, in a social system that is normal for their species, exhibit heterosexual behavior as the norm.
One of my pets is a rescued male pigeon; because it was raised by me and my husband almost from the nest, it has transferred all of its sexual urges toward us, and toward our other male pigeon. Its natural social learning/behavior was interrupted. I am certain that if I presented a lady pigeon to him, he’d ‘go to town’; but he’d go to town on the male pigeon too, if I let them be together. He’s a pigeon; he’s not Man, who is far more complex than just “genes” has a much more complicated emotional/mental constitution.
I think this displacement can happen to humans, too. I don’t think that homosexual tendency has to be “genetic” to be something that a person would have a very hard time to overcome. It may have deep-seated roots in up-bringing, abuse, etc.
(I do sometimes wonder, however: if a gene, or some birth-defect were actually discovered as being a cause of homosexuality, what would the arguments pro/con be, toward people who aborted to cull it? Or, if it could be remedied by drugs, how would the ethics of that be determined? Opens an incredible can of worms....)
Just some random thoughts,
-JT
I don’t belong to any kind of “Church”.
And, after all: I’m too busy decorating my Pagan Tree, and doing elf-duty for that demon, Santa Claus.
I hope that you enjoy a Very Merry Christmas!
-JT
>>Perhaps you believe that problems, troubles, etc.,
>>are blessings-in-disguise.
I believe Romans 8:28 is true.
Uh, some spell it “SATAN’S CLAWS” ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.