What I said is factual - as proved by statements about unanimous consent. Notice how the conversation on that point very quickly went completely dead after that? Gee, why? Because it was shown that the anti-Catholic was wrong about unanimous consent. This happens all the time. Anti-Catholics attack the Church not even knowing what they are talking about.
No...the point didn't go away. Sometimes you realize it is not worth the effort to continue a conversation with someone who is constantly redefining words.
Catholics have redefined worship and now unanimous to fit their narrative. From the article you posted earlier, the catholic definition of unanimous means whatever catholics want it to mean. It's like arguing with a four year old.
Uh; 'cause it was dumb?
Stupid?
Irrelevant?
Inane?
Lacking in thought?
Vlad-like?
Opps! Sorry for that last one; it was redundant.