Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
The two interpretations are not mutually exclusive when one keeps in mind the four senses of scripture.

Thanks; Luther; for keeping ME from having such a screwed up ability to think straight!

1,381 posted on 12/13/2014 3:10:44 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

“Thanks; Luther; for keeping ME from having such a screwed up ability to think straight!”

The same Luther who thought Mary was always a virgin and didn’t mind calling her ‘mother of God’? So much for that sola scriptura thing again.

Martin Luther:[Mary] became the Mother of God, in which work so many and such great good things are bestowed on her as pass man’s understanding. For on this there follows all honor, all blessedness, and her unique place in the whole of mankind, among which she has no equal, namely, that she had a child by the Father in heaven, and such a Child.... Hence men have crowded all her glory into a single word, calling her the Mother of God.... None can say of her nor announce to her greater things, even though he had as many tongues as the earth possesses flowers and blades of grass: the sky, stars; and the sea, grains of sand. It needs to be pondered in the heart what it means to be the Mother of God.” Luther’s Works, 21:326, cf. 21:346.


1,396 posted on 12/13/2014 3:23:38 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1381 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson