Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer
As for your "salvation by grammar" barb, God chose what He chose as the linguistic wrapper on His message. If you don't like it, why complain to me about it?

Then the logical conclusion of that argument is that we should be in a process of returning to a pure language so we can understand God. We should not use English to discuss doctrine because English is a flawed language. The KJV and other English translations are incapable of explaining doctrine without delving into Hebrew, Greek, and Latin to reveal these divine truths because the common people will not understand. This sounds familiar.

993 posted on 12/06/2014 3:55:26 AM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981
I think no matter WHICH language is chosen, the Bible has indicated you'll have problems articulating certain things...

2 Corinthians 9:15
1 Peter 1:6-9

994 posted on 12/06/2014 4:34:28 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 993 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson