Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: .45 Long Colt

“Rick never spoke for Protestants because he has never been a Protestant.”

Actually he is a Protestant. Other Protestants may not like that, but it doesn’t change the fact that he is a Protestant.


9 posted on 11/24/2014 7:35:32 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998

If you believe that you don’t know the first thing about historic Protestantism. He’s not protesting anything because he agrees with the core free-will theology of Rome. Historic Protestants do not believe that theology. Protestants believe Rome is apostate whereas Rick believes Roman Catholicism is simply another expression of Christianity. Rick has vocally championed at least one book about “coming home” to Rome. The list of differences between Rick and historic Protestants is L O N G.


10 posted on 11/24/2014 7:45:57 AM PST by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998
Actually he is a Protestant.

Your error possibly derives from confusing a non-RC Christian with a Protestant.

Protestant is nowadays more of an RCC term applied to non-RCC worshipers of God than it is a Christian "What we believe" designation. There are different groups of RCC members. There are also many groups (fellowships, assemblies) of believers in and followers of the Lord Jesus Christ who do not consider themselves protesters against only RCC anti-Christian teachings.

But, yes of course, there are still some mainline Protestant denominations. In recent years at least, two or more of these Protestant groups have been following the lead of today's pope more than they have the unchanging Lord Jesus Christ.
17 posted on 11/24/2014 8:42:16 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson