Posted on 11/24/2014 6:13:56 AM PST by marshmallow
Saddleback Church founder speaks at Vatican-hosted Humanum Colloquium.
Pastor Rick Warren, Founder and Senior Pastor of Saddleback Churchan evangelical megachurch located in Lake Forest, Californiawas among the featured presenters at last week's Vatican-hosted Colloquium on the Complementarity of Man and Woman. Also known as the Humanum Colloquium, the conference gathered leaders and scholars from various Christian and non-Christian religions across the globe November 17-19 to examine and propose anew the beauty of the relationship between man and woman in marriage.
Warren, one of the most prominent evangelical leaders in the world, is perhaps most widely known as the author of the bestselling books The Purpose Driven Church and The Purpose Driven Life.
Aleteia's Rome correspondent sat down with Pastor Warren at the conclusion of the Humanum Colloquium to discuss his experience at the interreligious event; the six points of what he calls a "Purpose Driven Marriage"; and his first trip across the Tiber.
Pastor Warren, what has been your impression of this weeks colloquium on the complementarity of man and woman in marriage?
I think it was great because you heard people not only from the streams of Christianity but also non-Christian religions showing solidarity with us about what we call the biblical definition of marriage: one man and one woman for life.
Thats a good thing. Right now in the world, the minority view is getting the majority of press, and you just dont hear the fact that the vast majority of people believe that marriage is what its always been since the Creation: one man and one woman for life.
What have been some of the highlights of the Humanum Colloquium?
Rabbi [Jonathan] Sacks is a friend of mine, and his message was outstanding. [Jacqueline] Rivers message was just outstanding. Sr. Prudence was just fantastic. She is so brilliant.
(Excerpt) Read more at aleteia.org ...
So Rick is not a "historic" Protestant? Do you mean a "traditional" Protestant?
I thought you guys hated "tradition"! Don't tell me you have your own??
Ping
Of course there would. We get a hint of it here.
Romans 14:3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him. 4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand. 5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. 6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.
So there are allowable differences that are not affecting salvation that different people can hold and form groups that believe the same. Those silly duped Catholics think that all people need to believe only specific things dictated by Rome.
Oh boy!
Here come the Mormon 'apologists'!
They could sure write sentences back then!
Lol
This southern baptist will take JP or Benedict over mushy Warren any day
Easy
Just like...
There is no historic Catholicism either.
I thought you guys hated "tradition"! Don't tell me you have your own??
Set 'em up!
Knock 'em down!
YANCVP thread?
goats could give quite a fight trying to drag them into the water. Wish I could post a picture of my largest breeder with horns point to point about 44 inches and a head as hard as cement...lol Any billy that can shear over 40 pounds of hair at one shearing, and takes 2 men to take him down isn’t about to go into the water willingly....lol
“In your zeal to defend all things Catholic, Roman and otherwise, in your ignorance, you are stomping on thin ice.”
No, I expressed no ignorance, but merely a fact. Protestants followed their own man-made teachings.
“I sincerely urge you to reconsider your statement.”
I sincerely urge you to learn the truth.
“BTW, nothing I posted to you is false; you just don’t believe it’s true.”
No, what you posted is false. It would be false whether or not I recognized it to be so.
“Of course there would. We get a hint of it here.”
Completely false. No one disputes there would be schisms, but so many official ones and so many as is? No, that is because of the very roots of Protestantism itself.
“There is no historic Catholicism either.”
No. The Catholic faith has a contiguous history stretching back to Christ and the Apostles. Protestantism has a “history” stretching back no further than Luther - which means it has almost no history at all - and it is a “history” fraught with relativistic and subjective twists and turns showing it is nothing but a man-made group of sects.
What's so surprising about that? Some are simply differences that are not related to salvation. Some are differences that do relate to salvation. No one ever said error will not creep into different "churches". We already see that happening in John's time when he wrote Revelation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.