Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueDragon
Why publish mish-mash of scripture in that manner? That such herky-jerky combinations are interspersed with instances where you cite scripture more precisely in the way each sentence follows another in the actual text -- makes it all that much the worse when you do not. And that font -- not fit for a king (despite the name "royal" someone chose to attach to that color) but fit for being passed over and ignored for reason of being difficult to read from a white background. But I suppose the font may serve well if the aim is to state whatever it is -- but not have any question the way you may be intending for it to be taken to mean.

If you don't want it, give it back.

Do you have an alternative holy catholic apostolic church to the Catholic Church, and if so, does it have some kind of denominational or fellowship name ?

2,376 posted on 10/18/2014 8:30:57 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2372 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981

Now, in orchid.

So---you'd like to strip the word of God, from the [adopted] children?

Is that it? Oh, but do it in such a way to make out to be that it was their idea, that they were agreeing to this "giving it back"?

Look -- I was merely pointing out that your own style of presentation itself, was misleading usage.

Should I go back and map out for one and all, all the different books of the NT from which you extracted passage from here and there, blending them all together in unbroken narrative ---as if--- the manner you presented it was order (and context) which all of it could be found?

That was the problem.

Your intended usage (as far as that could be perceived) or how it comes across that you may have intended those passages apply -- are yet another "problem", but never mind the rabbit warren of all of that, for now...

I will not now being turning the scriptures back in (like an overdue library book?) to yourself, or any other.

If there is a problem with that -- then introduce me to the writers themselves if it be they be as super-Methuselah (and still living) and desire their own written works be returned to them -- and I would do so quite directly.

Meanwhile make your case (if you have one) in fair and clear usage of the scripture.

But if it's in that pale blue -- then why bother?

People are actually supposed to read that? Or is it more like I said --- most will just skip over it -- leaving your presentation(s) safe from close inspection as to your intended meanings?

If that is the way it is, then one may as well be talking to themselves (or the wall) for all the good it may do.

2,381 posted on 10/18/2014 9:40:47 PM PDT by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson