Now, in orchid.
So---you'd like to strip the word of God, from the [adopted] children?
Is that it? Oh, but do it in such a way to make out to be that it was their idea, that they were agreeing to this "giving it back"?
Look -- I was merely pointing out that your own style of presentation itself, was misleading usage.
Should I go back and map out for one and all, all the different books of the NT from which you extracted passage from here and there, blending them all together in unbroken narrative ---as if--- the manner you presented it was order (and context) which all of it could be found?
That was the problem.
Your intended usage (as far as that could be perceived) or how it comes across that you may have intended those passages apply -- are yet another "problem", but never mind the rabbit warren of all of that, for now...
I will not now being turning the scriptures back in (like an overdue library book?) to yourself, or any other.
If there is a problem with that -- then introduce me to the writers themselves if it be they be as super-Methuselah (and still living) and desire their own written works be returned to them -- and I would do so quite directly.
Meanwhile make your case (if you have one) in fair and clear usage of the scripture.
But if it's in that pale blue -- then why bother?
People are actually supposed to read that? Or is it more like I said --- most will just skip over it -- leaving your presentation(s) safe from close inspection as to your intended meanings?
If that is the way it is, then one may as well be talking to themselves (or the wall) for all the good it may do.
Then it helps. :-)
Thank you for making me smile and laugh;
A merry heart maketh a cheerful countenance: but by sorrow of the heart the spirit is broken.
A merry heart doeth good like a medicine: but a broken spirit drieth the bones.