Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981
I'm glad if you acknowledge Peter's designation at the word of our Lord. Peter exercised this leadership at the Council, in unity with the other Apostles (and those eligible to be Apostles). Peter had the power to bind and loose.

You may recall that the opinion of James was the one the Council went with....not Peter's. Looks like James had the leadership role. So there was no "leader" as you presuppose.

But back to the original topic; you took a verse out of context and tried to make an example of a false teaching within the Bible.....much as you are attempting to do this with poor comparison.

1,887 posted on 10/16/2014 12:28:06 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1882 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone
You may recall that the opinion of James was the one the Council went with....not Peter's. Looks like James had the leadership role. So there was no "leader" as you presuppose.

Not at all; Peter was the Apostle of all the Jews (like the Pope) while James was the leader in the church at Jerusalem (like a Bishop). You will never be able to separate the Jewish Apostles from Messiah, or from each other, to mimic the rebellions, reformations, and reconstructions among the Gentiles who call themselves disciples but reject one holy catholic and apostolic church.

1,897 posted on 10/16/2014 12:44:06 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1887 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson