Try reading the paragraphs in context to one another, and then seen in light of the wider conversation.
The difference concerned dopes who "pope" and those not dopey enough to do so.
Google "receptionism" and while examining what may be found of that, consider also Calvin's description of "pneumatic presence" and the like.
As to demands for greater detail -- you are in no position to demand anything of either her or myself.
I did write a thorough explanation...and was considering inclusion of brief passage from Ratzinger writing rather esoterically tangent to how I had placed mention of himself doing so (in regards to Holy Communion, as the Anglicans call it) but have decided to send nothing until there be some apology for the recent ad hominems.
The satirization I well enough understood.
The Tiber, The Swift (where Tyndal's ashes were tossed as I made mention to you earlier this thread), Da-Nile, all of them rivers, but in contexts in which those are placed, not merely so.
It's likely they got themselves (at least their paws) "feelthy" when doing so.
Hence the phrase, "feelthy papist"?
Sons of a different mother so often they have shown themselves to be.
But look on the bright side. No one can blame Mary (mother of the incarnate Christ) for their behaviors.
They be more as Ishmaels, but even lesser and lower than that, not able to trace fleshly bloodlines either.
“Try reading the paragraphs in context to one another, and then seen in light of the wider conversation.”
Did. Still makes no sense.
“The Swift (where Tyndal’s ashes...”
?