Another one bites the dust, ping!
“Tolerance” on display. This is about hatred and conformity, weather you like it or not. Just read the account in Genesis, nothing has changed.
Because some people in government are now hostile to marriage as God defined it, in order to protect godly marriage we must remove the power of the State to define and regulate marriage. Then anyone will be perfectly free to enter into whatever relationship they want. However, they will not be able to call upon the police power of the state to force me to recognize a “marriage” that I know is theologically illegitimate and morally repugnant.
If we remove government from marriage and return it to the private sphere where it came from, lesbians can still marry each other, but they won’t be able to use government to force me to sell them wedding cake or artfully photograph their “marriage”. They will be free to do as they please without being able to coerce anyone else about their private affair.
But this was never really about marriage. For homosexuals it was social engineering and payback. They could bust marriage as God defined it, they could rub Christianity’s nose in it, they could punish people who objected and they could force anyone who was too vocal to shut up. But what they really want is approval, and it just galls them that a lot of people will never give it to them.
“Conform or be punished.”
The American ISIS. Given enough time, it will become “convert or die.”
I don’t know how to end this.....can a business be by appt only?....can it select what groups it will serve?....such as “Conservative Jews” or “traditional Catholics” only?
The “loving” couple will be divorced less than a year after they “marry”.
“In addition, the Bloomsburg Town Council met last night to discuss the incident and decide whether or not to propose a new law that will ban businesses from refusing to serve LGBT customers. If they do so, it will give the lesbian couple grounds upon which to sue Miller.”
Ex Post Facto. On some other grounds perhaps, but not on a law or regulation passed after the incident.
The peaceful left and their friends the lesbians. If this was a white hetrosexual group they would be all under investigation for hate crimes.
Liberal thugs will have us all in a concentration camp before you know it.
Remember when they wanted to be left alone in their bedrooms?
It is the Mark of the Beast apparently
Yep.
Queers: "We are the 2.3%". 07/15/2014 192kb.pdf
1.6% or 2.3%, it's still a tiny, tiny percentage.
Even more sinister in this case is that the Lesbians did not even have to go to the government to have the bridal shop owners prosecuted, but instead resorted to social media and caused the bridal shop to lose business due to a stealth boycott.
**As a result, Miller has hired an attorney to defend her in the event a lawsuit is filed.**
She needs to go to Thomas More Law Center
So...where’s that Bully Legislation or Hate Crime Legislation now? Who does it serve?
Really?
Ex post facto law?
You can't sue for what was legal before the law was passed that made it illegal.
-PJ
Wonder if any in the hate group are Muslim? How’s diversity working out for you......?
I don`t love those type of people but I guess if they was needing food or water I would give it to them which is what Jesus met by love your enemy.
Homosexuals have a lot in common with the Islamists in Iraq. Conform to our beliefs or we will kill you/your business. Both are unacceptable in a free society.
i’m sorry, we are not equipped with the expertise to do lgbt weddings.