Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Claud
1. Not exactly tracking the Trinity part and the OPC tie in. In the OPC, as well as other truly reformed churches, it is held that the Trinity is clearly taught in Scripture. Can someone struggle with the concept as part of Christian growth? Yes. Is is allowed to teach that heresy in Sunday School or as part of some small group or Sunday School? No. That would violate the doctrinal purity of the church. If someone is certain that Scripture is 100% silent, then then perhaps they are a better fit for one of the many cults that circle Christianity.

But this article is referring to the pastors who make proclamations outside of established doctrine of the church. Something like members must give 50% tithes, or only drive battery powered cars.

2. Those who disagree are those who maybe have an issue with an expansion project, or question some program. Not those who are practicing heretical teaching.

16 posted on 07/23/2014 9:19:59 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is room for all of God's animals. Right next to the mashed potatoes and gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Gamecock

Again....sola scriptura?


34 posted on 07/23/2014 10:46:57 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Gamecock
But this article is referring to the pastors who make proclamations outside of established doctrine of the church. Something like members must give 50% tithes, or only drive battery powered cars.

And that certainly makes sense, because a parochial opinion on matters like that cannot override the consensus of the entire Church.

I would just be careful to note that "established doctrine" tends to be a sticky wicket. What was the established doctrine in the Quartodeciman controversy? Sure they were a minority in the ancient world, but didn't they have an established practice apparently given to them by St. John himself? So would it be untoward for a Christian today to adopt it? I don't know the answer, but I think having as wide a historical grasp as possible helps to counter any parochialism we may bring to the table to define what "established doctrine" is.

2. Those who disagree are those who maybe have an issue with an expansion project, or question some program. Not those who are practicing heretical teaching.

Good. Point taken then. I might expect creedal laxity from a lot of folks on here, but sure as heck not from a Calvinist!

40 posted on 07/23/2014 1:08:19 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson