Replies

A "righteous proselyte" is a gentile who has converted to Judaism, is bound to all the doctrines and precepts of the Jewish economy, and is considered a full member of the Jewish people.

Acts 15:1-5

¹ Certain people came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the believers: “Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved.” ² This brought Paul and Barnabas into sharp dispute and debate with them. So Paul and Barnabas were appointed, along with some other believers, to go up to Jerusalem to see the apostles and elders about this question. ³ The church sent them on their way, and as they traveled through Phoenicia and Samaria, they told how the Gentiles had been converted. This news made all the believers very glad. ⁴ When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and the apostles and elders, to whom they reported everything God had done through them.

⁵ Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”

Verse 5 is the critical verse there. “Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised AND required to keep the law of Moses.”

Since we know that the council decided not in the favor of the Pharisees assertion (this is clear from the text) then we also know (again from verse 5) that we are not required to keep the law of Moses.

The opposite is a common tactic among those who believe keeping the Mosaic law is still required today. They will state, “The council of Jerusalem only decided the issue of whether or not one needed to be circumcised. Not whether or not the law of Moses was still for today”.

But we have verse 5, and the conjunction “AND” there that clearly shows BOTH topics were on the table, if not clearly stated later in the passage so what. It’s clearly stated in verse FIVE. That is the correct context for the council of Jerusalem.

But this is what one gets, when one “reads the Bible for oneself”, divorced from all historical and/or traditional teaching and guidance: confusion. We get an “invisible church” that is “unified” in “all the important doctrines”...

Except of course whether or not one is under the law of Moses today.

< sarc >That’s not an important doctrine. It’s trivial. It’s so trivial in fact, some will spend days arguing the point, if not weeks and months, and some will get so heated over the issue that their posts will be pulled. Yes, I spend days and weeks arguing unimportant topics. I get my posts pulled all the time for trivial matters. < /sarc >