To: daniel1212
But i am not the one claiming assured infallibility.Sure you are. Or are you saying you could be wrong?
Then what is your point?
102 posted on
06/15/2014 11:53:51 PM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: D-fendr
Sure you are.No; he isn't.
If he were; I'm SURE it would have been posted, BOLDED and perhaps even colored to easily prove it to those who could NOT find it, in what Dan had posted, without 'help'.
104 posted on
06/16/2014 3:55:04 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: D-fendr
Sure you are. Or are you saying you could be wrong? Then what is your point? Indeed i do not claim to possess assured formulaic infallibility, which Rome has infallibly decreed she has. Thus my appeal for assurance of Truth must be to substantiation from a wholly Divinely inspired source of Truth. That is the point.
Do you possess assured infallibility, or is your appeal to a wholly Divinely inspired source of Truth?
110 posted on
06/16/2014 7:19:44 AM PDT by
daniel1212
(Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson