[daniel1212]

Sure you are. Or are you saying you could be wrong? Then what is your point?

Indeed i do not claim to possess assured formulaic infallibility, which Rome has infallibly decreed she has. Thus my appeal for assurance of Truth must be to substantiation from a wholly Divinely inspired source of Truth. That is the point.

Do you possess assured infallibility, or is your appeal to a wholly Divinely inspired source of Truth?

[D-fendr]

Is this an infallible statement from daniel1212:

assurance of Truth must be to substantiation from a wholly Divinely inspired source of Truth.

Substantiated according to whom? Would that be the same daniel1212?

Seems the point is still: their basis for assurance should be an internet persona called daniel1212.