Dan spent a lot of energy (and a lot of virtual paper) to explain away verses which literal meaning is Catholic. The explanation does not hold: between the two discourses on the Eucharist, in John 6 and in 1 Cor. 11, and the Last Supper episode allegory cannot be argued. That he does while proclaiming himself a believer in Sola Scriptura. You don’t think irony is out of place here?
Bla bla bla. AA, I understand, we all get that you read those words and see your Church's doctrine. It doesn't justify an insult based on ignorance of the Bible reading habits of someone you don't know. It completely discredits your position. The only real "irony" I'm seeing here is on your side of the table. Sorry.