Bla bla bla. AA, I understand, we all get that you read those words and see your Church's doctrine. It doesn't justify an insult based on ignorance of the Bible reading habits of someone you don't know. It completely discredits your position. The only real "irony" I'm seeing here is on your side of the table. Sorry.
The end result is, operatively, ignorance. I don't know if Daniel really read the Bible or not; he probably does. But the end result of all these "hermeneutics" is that half the New Testament did not have to be written as it needs to be explained away and negated in order to make it fit the Protestant theological fantasies.