Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moral Mayhem Multiplied—Now, It’s Polygamy’s Turn
albertmohler.com ^ | December 16, 2013 | Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr.

Posted on 12/16/2013 9:47:59 AM PST by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/16/2013 9:47:59 AM PST by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

If ANYone thought that it would stop with legalizing Gay marriage....they were not thinking. Eventually we will be able to marry animals. Just wait and see.


2 posted on 12/16/2013 9:57:01 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

The slope is slippery.


3 posted on 12/16/2013 9:59:24 AM PST by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

bestiality is next ... obama will certainly smile at that ... especially when men are allowed to marry their pet gerbils ....


4 posted on 12/16/2013 10:00:42 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Swine Piss be upon the Sodmite Obama, and his Child-Rapist False Prophet Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

or their horses ....


5 posted on 12/16/2013 10:02:38 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Swine Piss be upon the Sodmite Obama, and his Child-Rapist False Prophet Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Just wait until we can marry our pet and then want to put a $500k life insurance policy on the animal.


6 posted on 12/16/2013 10:06:41 AM PST by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

At this point it would be far simpler to remove any state recognition of marriages at all.

What is the state’s interest any more?

Care for the children? They gave that up when they allowed homosexual marriages, child abusive relationships on their face.

So, just erase all of it.


7 posted on 12/16/2013 10:08:12 AM PST by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Technically, this ruling had nothing to do with polygamous marriage, as the party involved did not have a plural marriage.

The ruling deals with whether a person can openly co-habitate with multiple people. It is hard to see how a law prohibiting this could stand in light of recent rulings.

If we allow a person to co-habitate with one other person without marriage, why not two, or three, or more?

Religiously, we should strongly oppose anything beyond sex within marriage. But from a liberty perspective, where do we draw the line regarding government by force of law regulating private actions between individuals?


8 posted on 12/16/2013 10:08:44 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Turley is an odd dude.


9 posted on 12/16/2013 10:16:06 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

We raised my daughter to share our belief that she is the beloved and blessed child of our Heavenly Father who has been entrusted to our care. We did our best to prepare her for a Godly and rewarding life. She is a joy.

Too bad for the little girls destined to be mired in the degradation and hopelessness of polygamy. Mr. Brown, like a bantam rooster, will strut his stuff, exist nicely on multiple public assistance incomes, and live out his days attended by his harem.


10 posted on 12/16/2013 10:16:53 AM PST by July4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Ya know that 1st cousin you’ve always had the hots for...?


11 posted on 12/16/2013 10:27:32 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Turley is an odd dude.

Turley. Rhymes with girly.

12 posted on 12/16/2013 10:32:27 AM PST by llevrok (Obama 2008 : "If you vote for me, you can keep your country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Polygamy doesn’t bother me near as much as two men marrying.

It’s a preference, just like homosexuality Pedophilia, anmd Necrophilia.

After all we are supposed to accept everyone’s sexual preference these days aren’t we?


13 posted on 12/16/2013 10:41:24 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

There are several examples of successful and thriving societies where polygamy has been widespread. There are no successful societies where homosexuality is the norm. From Sodom and Gomorrah to Nazi Germany the have been many societies where homosexuality was prevalent among the ruling class.

None survived.


14 posted on 12/16/2013 10:44:27 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

As far as I can tell Utah didn’t even prosecute for violating their bigamy/cohabitation law anyway, so I’m not sure what difference it makes now that part of it is struck down. When they prosecute it seems like it is always for benefit fraud or some type of abuse.

30 years from now the state might outlaw religiously hetero traditional marriage as unlawful cohabitation. It’s no stranger than ‘gay marriage’ being recognized in 16 states would have seemed 30 years ago.

Freegards


15 posted on 12/16/2013 10:52:59 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

If the Mormons want polygamy, the Mormons should keep their polygamy. Period. Well, actually, multiple periods per month.


16 posted on 12/16/2013 10:56:57 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Some will say that women living in close proximity wind up having their periods at the same time. True or not? It is hotly debated.

But it is a frightening thought.


17 posted on 12/16/2013 11:05:52 AM PST by Gamecock (There are not just two ways to respond to God but three: irreligion, religion, and the gospel. (TK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

The right to privacy in one’s beliefs must also exist for those who refuse to serve the interests of those they disagree with. A baker can not be required to bake a cake for a homosexual couple based on the same logic that allows a homosexual couple to cohabitate. Both are privacy rights.


18 posted on 12/16/2013 11:27:02 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
bestiality is next

Nah...PETA won't let that happen. /s

19 posted on 12/16/2013 11:35:24 AM PST by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc; Patton@Bastogne
They will advocate for it! After all, allowing bestiality will do away with species-ism.
20 posted on 12/16/2013 11:41:18 AM PST by Gamecock (There are not just two ways to respond to God but three: irreligion, religion, and the gospel. (TK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson