There are many, one example being the tradition of sola scriptura. Sure, blame the Catholics. It happens to W all the time.
Scripture itself tells me that it is able to make me wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
What more do we need?
Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
Hmm. Interesting that Paul would commend them for searching the SCRIPTURE to see if even what he taught was correct.
Then there is the fact that Jesus said 25 times it is written. Can you show me where He commended tradition?
Of course there is this.
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Galatians 1:8-9
Of course Im sure you can show proof of where the apostles taught something that wasnt written down in scripture?
If you cant. Then whatever is taught that you cant prove the apostles taught constitutes another gospel and that is a rather serious error. Im sure you would want to prove that the RCC or anyone else who teaches something not found in scripture can be proven was taught by the apostles right? Or would you agree that scripture is the source we should go to in order to prove what they teach is what the apostles taught? Aka sola scriptura.
Nice linkage; but STILL an oxymoron.