Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Veneration of Mary in Luke 11:27-28
August 15, 2013 | Annalex

Posted on 08/15/2013 7:03:11 PM PDT by annalex

Once a woman in the crowd surrounding Christ and His disciples cries out to Him:

Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the paps that gave thee suck. (Luke 11:27)

What is it? We have, clearly, an act of venerating Mary. Note that the Blessed Virgin is venerated properly: not on her own but as the mother of Christ. Yet the reason for venerating is indeed concerning: it is her physiological and physiologically unique relationship with Jesus that is emphasized. That is not yet paganism with its crude theories of gods giving birth to other gods, but it is lacking proper focus and Jesus corrects it:

Yea rather, blessed are they who hear the word of God, and keep it. (Luke 11:28)

The Virgin with the Child on her knees and a prophet pointing at the star. Catacomb of Priscilla, late 2nd c. Source
Note that there is no condemnation here, not even asking the woman to stop; the "yea rather" (μενουνγε) is not a negation. It is used other times in the New Testament without a hint of negation. In Philippians 3:8 "αλλα μενουνγε και ηγουμαι παντα ζημιαν ειναι", "Furthermore I count all things to be but loss" (Textus Receptus 1550/1894, Byzantine/Majority Text 2000 has here "αλλα μεν ουν και ηγουμαι…" which is the same word morphology spelled separately and colliding affirmative "γε" with the following "και"). Romans 9:20 "μενουνγε ω ανθρωπε συ τις ει ο ανταποκρινομενος τω θεω" and Romans 10:18 "μενουνγε εις πασαν την γην εξηλθεν ο φθογγος αυτων" use the word reinforcing the subsequent statement. Some translations obscure this linguistic fact: in King James for example, the same word is rendered correctly, "yea rather" in Luke 11:28, wholly incongruously, "nay but" in Romans 9:20, but in Romans 10:18 the translation is again correct, "Yes verily". NRSV has both correct and elegant translations for all three. (See The Holy Mother and the "ΜΕΝΟΥΝΓΕ")

Having gotten past this linguistic hurdle, we can understand clearly what this passage, Luke 11:27-28, does: it establishes veneration of saints based not on their blood relation to Christ but on their obedience to God. It is in that sense that we venerate Our Lady: given that Christ is the Word of God personified, she heard and kept both Him in person as her Child and His teaching, figuratively. In Mary the essence of sainthood is seen in the flesh as well as in the mind. We could say that by the late second century at the latest, when we find evidence of the veneration of both the prophets and the Mother of God in the catacombs, the two reasons to venerate a saint: his martyrdom as in the case of Polycarp, or his obedience to the Word, as in Mary, -- unite into a single practice.


TOPICS: Catholic; History; Orthodox Christian
KEYWORDS: catholic; mary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,801-1,8201,821-1,8401,841-1,860 ... 2,741 next last
To: annalex; cuban leaf; daniel1212
The extended quote (James 5:13-16) does not alter my statement: we are instructed to pray for others, and prayer of a righteous person is efficacious. I did not pretend that St. James includes in this passage specifically the saints that are passed on, but neither is he telling us NOT TO ask for prayers of saints in the afterlife. To a Christian, death does not represent any kind of barrier, certainly not where prayer is concerned.

Actually, you DID use that passage to promote praying to departed "saints". Inventing dogmas that are based on something the Scripture doesn't say you can't believe is dangerous. It is the cause of MUCH of the superstitious notions that cropped up in the medieval world.

Not to belabor the point, but let me explain why I disagree with the idea of prayers to departed "saints". I'll try to keep it short so you aren't burdened with another "dissertation".

First of all, asking fellow living believers to pray for you is giving them a part in what happens in your life - it gets them concerned for others and helps take "self" off the table as the primary concern.

Second, when they see prayers answered in their lives and others they have prayed for, their faith grows and matures. It is strengthened and edified and causes them to learn to trust God for all things. It teaches the lesson that we CAN cast ALL our cares on Him because He cares for us.

Third, praying to a departed "saint" doesn't provide that same benefit as we can not really know whether or not what results in our lives is because of their intercession or our own beseeching of God. What I see happening quite a bit WRT Catholic prayer to departed saints is the "saint" gets the praise and glory, the newspaper classified ad praise and exaltation. (i.e., need to sell your house? Bury a St. Joseph statuette in your yard...thanks St. Joseph! Need to find a lost item? Pray to St. Anthony. Have a lost cause, pray to St. Jude and remember to thank him or he won't help you next time.) Rarely, is Almighty God praised for the answered prayer. Even the process that a dead Catholic goes through to be considered a saint requires THREE verified and documented "miracles" that prove the person was prayed to and God heard it and granted the request!

Scripture says that ALL praise and glory and honor belongs to the Lord, it won't be shared by any others. In reality, Catholics do NOT have Scripture to back up their doctrines about praying to dead saints. It would be refreshing to see someone at least admit it for once.

1,821 posted on 09/14/2013 11:32:50 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1799 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Amen. The saddest group is the poor saps in the pews. Except for the fact that they refuse to open their Bibles and learn the truth. Those pews would be empty in a snap if that were the case. But they just sit there, mesmerized by the pageantry of it all.


1,822 posted on 09/15/2013 3:30:16 AM PDT by smvoice (The 2 greatest days of your life: the day you're born. And the day you discover why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1816 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Anyone but Jesus.....


1,823 posted on 09/15/2013 4:54:28 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1821 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

That’s the way Satan has always worked. Just a simple word change here or there and vuala you have deception. Thank God we have the Spirit of Christ within us and the promise that He will never let us go.


I’ve never said it, but yes, I’ve thought it as I read some of those posts. It was not until the last few years that I realized that when the word Satan is used in the bible, it often can be translated into “spiritual enemy” or other more generic term. As when Jesus said to Peter, “get behind me, Satan”. He was telling Peter that what he was saying was against the will of God.

But yeah...


1,824 posted on 09/15/2013 5:03:17 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1755 | View Replies]

To: annalex

Do I need to also prove to you that St. Paul believed in life after death?


What Christian doesn’t?

Maybe this has never been taught to you, but linear time is merely a part of creation. Here is my take on it:

Eternity is not time neverending. It is a different place - outside of what we call linear time. That is why Jesus said:

John 8:58
“Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!”

I believe it was Jesus who touched the Hip of Jacob and put it out of joint. I believe that those who are resurrected to eternal life are alive, now “will be”.

So yes, I believe in eternal life, and I just assumed all Christians did, including Paul the apostle.


1,825 posted on 09/15/2013 5:08:49 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1795 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Jesus never said ‘born again’. He said ‘born from above’, and ‘born of water and the Spirit’. We may have a failure to communicate here.


He said neither. He did not speak English. However, the words he used can be translated to mean either. That is why some bibles translate it one way and others translate it another. And I prefer the version that does not translate words that mean “dwelling place” into the word “mansion”.

One of the things that really annoys me about my church is just how many hymns we sing that have the word “mansion” in them even though the only place it appears in the bible is a gross misstranslation in the KJV.

I actually use the word “room” when we sing those songs.

On a side note, when singing I also replace thee and thou with “you”.


1,826 posted on 09/15/2013 5:14:45 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1601 | View Replies]

To: metmom; boatbums; smvoice
Anyone but Jesus.....

Catholic veneration is otherwise known as idolatry!


1,827 posted on 09/15/2013 5:17:43 AM PDT by WVKayaker ("So we're bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I'm the idiot?" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1823 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Yeah, regarding 1 Cor 16:1.

Your definition is too narrow. He's talking about those out doing the Lord's work. Today it would be like a missions program.

Here is a good definition and explanation of the use of the word you are referring to that is translated "Saints" in that scripture:

www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexImage.cfm?tv=1379248388539&a

1,828 posted on 09/15/2013 5:37:37 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1795 | View Replies]

To: annalex

To a Christian, death does not represent any kind of barrier, certainly not where prayer is concerned.


Actually it does. One does not pray for the dead.


1,829 posted on 09/15/2013 5:38:31 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1799 | View Replies]

To: annalex

Thanks and I tend to agree. If one accepts the blood of Christ for the perfect redemption of sin and then seeks a closer relation with and understanding of his Creator, it will work out in the end.

I’m not saying this happened, but I find it a compelling thought exercise: One of C. S. Lewis’ friends said that after Lewis had died, he was working in his office and Lewis suddenly appeared, sitting in one of his leather chairs. Lewis made one statement and then he was gone:

“It’s not that hard.”

Now it is up to the reader to interpret what “it” is - and, of course if they think it really happened. ;-)


1,830 posted on 09/15/2013 5:42:30 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1800 | View Replies]

To: annalex

Still “spamming” means something different: sending the same message to great many people who did not ask for it, at zero cost to the sender. I reject that characterization of my posts.


My apologies. What I really mean is that unless your post is a short story, with a plot and everything. Few people will read more than a few sentences and move on. Nobody is obligated to read our posts and unless they consider us an authority (or we write in an entertaining way) most of what we post beyond a few sentences never gets read.


1,831 posted on 09/15/2013 5:44:32 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1801 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; cuban leaf
"αγιος" indeed means "set apart". On that we agree; we are just arguing who is apart from whom.

you would tell us that all believers are not “set apart”, Holy, and sacred?

No. They need to have authentic Catholic faith living in their works, and be free from mortal sin in order to be justified and then they become saints. Saint Paul indeed writes of people who have not been judged yet, but nevertheless, it is a select group inside the church of Corinth, not the entire congregation, as these verses make clear.

1 Corinthians 6:1. Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? So we see there that he is talking to all the believers in Corinth.

And you are double-talking. Paul indeed is addressing all the congregation. But he is urging them to "go to law ... before the saints" so naturally the "saints" are distinct from those who are judged by them.

2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world?

And that is where you claim he is talking to “an ecclesial court of peer” right? But lets go on in that verse again remembering that he is talking to all the believers in Corinth. Unless of course you claim hat those “ecclesial court of peers” were the only ones he was talking to

Again he is talking to all but it does not mean all "will judge the world"; the saints will, -- he said so.

3 and if the world shall be judged by you.

So, he was talking to the all the believes at Corinth saying “the world shall be judged by you”. Notice, the saints shall judge the world” and followed by “shall be judged by you”.

Right, but the two -- the group spoken to and the group that will judge are not the same group at the moment of Paul's speech. There is the little word "if" that points to the parishioners' intention to become saints and St Paul encourages them. The rest of the chapter is devoted to that very subject: how do the litigants become saints and becomes capable of judgement? And this is Paul's lesson: to be ready to suffer loss (v. 7), be "neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers" (v. 9); he concludes "Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God" (v. 10).

So this is what separates saints from the rest of the parishioners: they are clean and humble and that makes them judges and gives them life eternal.

Observe further that St. Paul does not condemn the litigants. He writes: "such some of you were; but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the Spirit of our God" (1 Cor. 6:11). So therefore they are all sanctified, but not all are saints yet.

Indeed, as I pointed out, the saints are not only separate as judges; there are collections made for them: see 1 Corinthians 16:1, 2 Corinthians 9:1 and a few similar.

The saints are the object of imitation to the parishioners but they are not every parishioner. Quoting more of myself:

St. Paul speaks of sainthood as an aspiration:
to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that invoke the name of our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 1:2)

the beloved of God, called to be saints (Romans 1:7)

to them that love God, all things work together unto good, to such as, according to his purpose, are called to be saints. (Romans 8:28)

In all these quotes, unlike the two previous groups, the reference is explicitly made to all Christians, that is all who believe in Christ and love God, or receive God’s love. But to Paul they are not quite “saints” but rather “called to be saints”. That then matches the modern understanding perfectly, where we think of all believers as being on the road to sainthood, rather than necessarily sainted already. Was Paul thinking exclusively in terms of this life rather than afterlife as he reminded fellow Christians of their calling? No such narrow focus is apparent from the text itself, and surely St. Paul understood that not everyone would have an opportunity to reach the old age and retire in the church with the “saints” for whom he, Paul, held collections. Indeed, the image of Stephen reaching martyrdom in young age in the presence of Paul surely stood in Paul’s mind. Therefore his “called to be saints” cannot be understood in terms of economic arrangement that the Church might make for its elders. It is a reminder that no matter of what age we die and in what manner, we are all called to be saints in heaven.

1,832 posted on 09/15/2013 9:27:00 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1805 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Veneration of saints is not another gospel. It logically matches the lessons of the gospel.


1,833 posted on 09/15/2013 9:27:59 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1806 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear; cuban leaf
some of them apparently are “despised in the church"

It is common for a saint to be despised by his fellow parishioners.

1,834 posted on 09/15/2013 9:29:23 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1809 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

I showed from scripture how they are a select group: they judge others, collections are made for them, and they are the model for other parishioners.


1,835 posted on 09/15/2013 9:30:58 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1819 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
Gospel never says that we MUST excel in good works in order to be saved like

Sure it does: the topic in James 2, Titus 3, Ephesians 2 is salvation, not, like you comically suggested not long ago, getting popular with others.

1,836 posted on 09/15/2013 9:33:44 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1820 | View Replies]

To: boatbums; cuban leaf; daniel1212
you DID use that passage to promote praying to departed "saints".

Of course, for that is what it teaches also. What I did not do was saying that it textually referred to departed saints. It does not: it refers to any saint at all.

I'll try to keep it short so you aren't burdened with another "dissertation".

Excellent. Thank you.

asking fellow living believers to pray for you is giving them a part in what happens in your life

That is even a better reason to ask a departed saint to do the same.

when they see prayers answered in their lives and others they have prayed for, their faith grows and matures

Of course, and likewise when we pray to a saint and God answers our prayer on the saint's intercession our faith grows and matures.

Third, praying to a departed "saint" doesn't provide that same benefit as we can not really know whether or not what results in our lives is because of their intercession or our own beseeching of God.

Whether you pray to a living saint or to departed one, it is invariably God Who answers the prayer on the intercession of that saint.

You haven't listed any distinction between a saint living and a saint departed. There is however one distinction you did not mention: when a canonized saint intercedes for me that is a prayer of "a just man" that "availeth much" (James 5:16). This is why, while it is good to ask your roommate to help you find that missing cellphone, it is better to ask St. Anthony.

1,837 posted on 09/15/2013 9:44:00 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1821 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Eternity is not time neverending. It is a different place - outside of what we call linear time

Yes, I agree.

1,838 posted on 09/15/2013 9:44:55 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1825 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
those out doing the Lord's work

Yes, possibly. The point is that it is a distinct group who need the collections, apart from those who offer the collections.

1,839 posted on 09/15/2013 9:47:06 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1828 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
One does not pray for the dead

I do, nearly daily. Everyone should pray for the souls of those who die. But that is not a prayer to saints for guidance and intercession: when someone dies I say a prayer for God (often invoking saints) to rest his soul with the saints.

1,840 posted on 09/15/2013 9:50:21 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1829 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,801-1,8201,821-1,8401,841-1,860 ... 2,741 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson