Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: Iscool
So you didn't believe the Protestants who I am sure told you to study the scriptures, and believe them...Did you make Jesus your Savior??? If Jesus is in your heart and the Holy Spirit indwells your body, why don't you have an appetite for the words of God in his scriptures??? Jesus drew you 'back' to the Catholic religion??? So you started out as a Catholic...

Still waiting for you to explain how God can be both eternal and infinite when you confine Him to space and time which will both end.

1,241 posted on 07/18/2013 1:57:51 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1239 | View Replies]

To: verga; Iscool

Please show and explain to us where and how he confined God to time and space.


1,242 posted on 07/18/2013 2:40:44 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
Please show and explain to us where and how he confined God to time and space.

Go read up thread. Around 1180 I'm not doing your homework for you.

1,243 posted on 07/18/2013 3:10:59 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1242 | View Replies]

To: verga
LOL Yeah, I didn’t think it was what he said either. Didn’t think you could show it or explain how he limited God to space and time. It’s because he didn’t. I one of those Catholic rabbit holes they like to create to try to obfuscate and dodge. Here is what really happened.

In post 876 you said this.

>>” God is both omnipotent (all powerful), and omnipresent. Many people make the mistake of believing that this is limited to "God is everywhere", but it also means that He is also "Everywhen"”

Everywhen?

Iscool then responded by asking you whether God was still doing a list of things since that would be what “Everywhen” would indicate. You never responded to that list of questions but simply accused Iscool of saying that he limited God to space and time which made absolutely no sense because Iscool did NOT indicate that he limited God to space and time.

Your incessant insistence that Iscool somehow explain how God is limited to space and time when Iscool said no such thing nor did he indicate such.

That’s why you can’t, without looking deceptive, explain how Iscool said that God was limited by space and time. He didn’t and I think you should stop the sham.

1,244 posted on 07/18/2013 3:40:55 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1243 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Meant to ping you.


1,245 posted on 07/18/2013 3:42:18 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

False belief placemarker


1,246 posted on 07/18/2013 3:44:24 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1245 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; Salvation
"Even by 1951 just a little of the gospels and the epistles were read on Sundays, with just 0.39% of the Old Testament (aside from the Psalms) being read at Vigils and major feast days in 1951. (http://catholic-resources.org/Lectionary/Statistics.htm) While that amount has increased since Vatican Two, only going to Mass will not give one a functional knowledge of Scripture. The average Catholic does not even get to Mass weekly, less alone daily as would be needed to get just 12.7% of the Bible over the two year reading cycle (based on stats from last source)"

The source you use is from a dissident Jesuit priest who is strongly against many of the teachings of the Catholic Church.    (Source:    http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/reviews/view.cfm?recnum=3673

Do you really think it is honest and ethical to use a source who is highly suspect due to being against the organization he is reporting on?    That is like asking President B.O. to tell us the truth about Conservatives or about the Bill of Rights, or like you daniel1212 getting your job application references or your mortgage application references from your worst enemies.

I would strongly suggest you look eleswhere for your statistics, if you really want an accurate, honest assessment.

- - - - - - -

"So how many RCs go to daily mass? Want some stats on what manner of fruit Rome overall produces, versus Evangelicals (even in the latter day apostasy of the church)"

Remember, daniel1212, that (of course) Protestants don't have daily church services.    But leaving that aside, your fixation on numbers is analysis based on, pardon the expression, a crock of nonsense.    Using that same logic, you would have to say that Jesus Christ Himself was a complete failure, as most of the people alive in His days of walking in the flesh in the Holyland rejected Him.    Only a small minority of the people accepted Him and His Holy Teachings.

The same can be said today.    The vast majority of people alive today are NOT Christians of ANY kind.    Does that somehow prove that Christianity is wrong?    ("By their fruits..." does NOT mean "By their comparative numbers..." -- think about the wide gate and the narrow gate...)

- - - - - - -

"And you are talking to a former RC who served as a lector and CCD teacher, and knows how RCs get bits of the Bible in Mass, with its truncated readings. "

Well, being a lector, you did some Mass readings, just like the "Scribes" and "Pharisees" did Scriptural readings in synagogues when Jesus walked in the flesh in the Holyland.

As such, you should be aware that there are many more readings done during a Mass than are done during typical Protestant church services.    And you would have to be aware (if you were paying attention during Mass) that the rest of the Mass is simply saturated with Sacred Scripture, including the Lord's Prayer, the multitude of Scriptural references during the various prayers and forms of Consecration before communion, etc.    (And you would HAVE to be aware of the great reverence Catholics show to the Scriptures, unless you weren't paying attention.    I'm sure you will agree that denying that would be VERY dishonest.    Anyone who cares to can independently check that for themselves by simply watching the Daily Mass on EWTN, or by reading the daily Bible readings as posted every day by FReeper "Salvation", and see for themselves just how "truncated" they really are.)

Now of course there is no way to determine how many Bible readings are done in the various Protestant denominations (other than direct observation), or how much of a percentage of the Bible they really read over time, because the denominations are all different, and there are no good statistics for "Protestants" as a whole, so you cannot really compare, except by direct observation, which I have done extensively for some of those denominations.

(Remember also that statistics often just lie.    Just observe what the mainstream media and the democrats constantly do with statistics, so you don't want to wager the fate of your soul on some highly questionable statistics.    And if you do really believe them, I have a nice parcel of water to sell you in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.)

- - - - - - -

"...and which is a minute percentage of RCs, and ignores the fact that they come in almost last in Bible reading, versus evangelicals. Ask random RCs to even name their favorite Bible verse and you usually get a blank stare And very very RCs will attempt to use the Bible to prove doctrine..."

Satan knows the Bible much better than you do daniel1212, and he could run circles around you giving Bible quotes, so don't feel too much pride there.

Also, remember that most of the original 12 Apostles Jesus picked were NOT Scripture scholars, but mere laborers and peasants.    Most likely most of them could not quote Scriptures with alacrity like Paul could.    (And, remember too, not one of those original 12 Apostles knew one single line from the epistles of Paul when the Chruch was first formed by Jesus Christ.)    God will not judge people based on how close they come to having Satan's superior Scriptural knowledge, and, thank God, He will not consult you when He conducts His judgments.

- - - - - - -

"Why would i want to return to Babylon? I was manifestly born again while still an RC, and stayed as a weekly attendee for 6 years (in the Catholic NE, while being fed spiritually via evangelical preaching on radio) [Jimmy Swaggart?], and know the profound difference btwn institutionalized faith and that seen in the church of the living God."

Have you ever seriously considered how extremely significant and sobering some of the differences between various Protestant denominations and groups really are?

For example, some Protestant denominations strongly believe in "once saved, always saved", and some other Protestant denominations strongly believe that "onces saved, always saved" is completely, 100% wrong and completely false, delusional, and dangerous.

If the latter group of Protestants is right, the former group of Protestants is in some deep, deep trouble, and it behooves the latter group of Protestants to strongly WARN the former group of Protestants, or the salvation of their souls may be in deep, deep jeopardy (based on those completely irreconcilable differences).    Don't you agree?

1,247 posted on 07/18/2013 3:50:30 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1054 | View Replies]

To: metmom
"That's interesting because we have other sources posted here that say the supreme authority for Catholics is either the pope or the 'Church'."

Do you believe that the Gospels (written by the Gospel writers) are infallible?    If so, did the writers of the Gospels write infallibly because of their own personal infallibility, or did they write infallibly because of the infallibility provided them by God?    (Or do you think God did NOT provide those writers with infallibility when writing those Gospels?)

You have to be able to grasp that Jesus Christ founded His Church, just like He solemnly promised, and He has NOT abandoned His Church, and He said that the gates of hell would NOT prevail against her, and that the Holy Spirit would always guide her.    Take Jesus at His word.

1,248 posted on 07/18/2013 3:52:42 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1066 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
"If you want to put an legitimacy to your claim, show us what God has done outside the scriptures pertaining to your religion...Otherwise, you may as well be blowing bubbles..."    "So what did Jesus tell you guys that he didn't write in the scriptures??? You got anything??? Anything at all???"

Iscool, we've all seen that you and your buddies here have been told the answer to that question numerous times, but you obdurately refuse to accept it.

The "New Testament" consists of 27 "books", most of which are "letters" written by Paul, and John, and Peter, etc.    Many other letters were written by Christians at that time, as well as other accounts of Christian endeavors, and so forth.    Show us anywhere in the Bible where it says which of all those writings should be included in that New Testament.

The truth is that there is no such text -- that was decided by human beings based on guidance provided by God OUTSIDE THE WRITTEN SCRIPTURES!!!

(There is no specification in the Bible as to which written documents to include in the New Testament, and there is no account in the Bible about how those writings were selected. Those things were all done "outside the Scriptures".)    If you dispute that, then show us all the exact text where it is specified what writings should be included in the New Testament.

In the past, when you or your buddies have been asked to provide that text, you quickly change the subject, and start going through all kinds of gyrations and contortions and misdirection to try to obfuscate that point and dodge the question.

The real truth, whether you wish to accept it or not, is that there is no text anywhere in the Bible that tells anyone which writings belong in the New Testament.    That decision was determined by human beings in Church Councils under the infallible guidance of God.

1,249 posted on 07/18/2013 3:57:09 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest; metmom
>>If so, did the writers of the Gospels write infallibly because of their own personal infallibility, or did they write infallibly because of the infallibility provided them by God?<<

Neither. They are infallible because the words written were given to the writers by the Holy Spirit. It’s not any mans infallibility. It’s only the RCC that perpetuates that myth. Christ was the only infallible man.

>>Take Jesus at His word.<<

We do. It’s just that we know that the “church” Jesus started is not the Roman Catholic Church. The RCC is a totally corrupt combination of Paganism and Christianity which has been condemned by God and is called the whore of Babylon in Revelation.

1,250 posted on 07/18/2013 4:14:28 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1248 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Read further, didn’t think you had the integrity to actually do it, and I was of course correct.


1,251 posted on 07/18/2013 4:20:44 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies]

To: verga
>>Read further<<

I’ve read the whole thread. Goodbye.

1,252 posted on 07/18/2013 4:34:14 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
"If so, did the writers of the Gospels write infallibly because of their own personal infallibility, or did they write infallibly because of the infallibility provided them by God?"

"Neither. They are infallible because the words written were given to the writers by the Holy Spirit. It’s not any mans infallibility. It’s only the RCC that perpetuates that myth. Christ was the only infallible man."

No, you read it wrong - please read it again. I said "Did they write infallibly because of the infallibility provided them by God. (That, of course is in reference to their writing, i.e., their physical writing. Either that fallible human wrote infallible writings by the guidance of the Holy Spirit, or he didn't.)

You do admit that fallible John physically wrote the "Gospel of John", for example, don't you, and that God used a fallible instrument to write an infallible document?

That is exactly the teaching if the Catholic Church. In very limited circumstances involving the Church's teachings on faith and morals, the Holy Spirit uses a fallible human to have him speak/write infallible documents.

I think you're starting to get it, even though you don't fully realize it yet.

1,253 posted on 07/18/2013 5:59:20 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1250 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
"We do. It’s just that we know that the “church” Jesus started is not the Roman Catholic Church. The RCC is a totally corrupt combination of Paganism and Christianity which has been condemned by God and is called the whore of Babylon in Revelation."

Wow, you sound here like the guys who were accusing Jesus of casting out demons by Beelzebul the ruler of the demons -- you might just want to think about that some more.

1,254 posted on 07/18/2013 6:08:50 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1250 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest
>>That is exactly the teaching if the Catholic Church.<<

Oh nice try! Let’s look at the promise Jesus gave the apostles.

John 14:26 But the Comforter, who is the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

Notice that word remembrance? That word followed by “whatsoever I have said to unto you” can not apply to anyone in the RCC. The RCC has duped people into believing that somehow they “acquired” that same “remembrance”. It’s ridiculous to follow that evil organization.

>>I think you're starting to get it, even though you don't fully realize it yet.<<

Oh I get it all right and I do fully realize that the RCC is a pagan cult. They admit themselves that they have incorporated pagan practices.

One would be very wise to head the admonition in Revelation to "come out of her".

1,255 posted on 07/18/2013 6:26:40 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1253 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest
>>Wow, you sound here like the guys who were accusing Jesus of casting out demons by Beelzebul the ruler of the demons<<

That’s part of the problem with followers of the RCC. They put the RCC on par with Jesus.

1,256 posted on 07/18/2013 6:29:40 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1254 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
"John 14:26 But the Comforter, who is the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."

Notice that word remembrance? That word followed by “whatsoever I have said to unto you” can not apply to anyone in the RCC. The RCC has duped people into believing that somehow they “acquired” that same “remembrance”. It’s ridiculous to follow that evil organization."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The problem with your interpretation here is that you are missing the word "and":

"He shall teach you all things AND

bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."

That designates two separate things, He shall teach you all things and [he shall] bring all the things I said to you to your remembrence.

You also seem to be plugging in the word "ONLY" here from your own mind, not from the words of Jesus Christ. He by no means is limiting the capabilities of the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit to just what He stated in that brief sentence. That just came from your own mind, CynicalBear, certainly not the Bible. Take another more careful look.

Most Christians agree that the Holy Spirit continues to do all kinds of other things today, which were NOT specified in that text you are wrongfully and erroneously modifying.

1,257 posted on 07/18/2013 7:01:08 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1255 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
"That’s part of the problem with followers of the RCC. They put the RCC on par with Jesus."

The Bible says (in Ephesians 5:22-33) that the Church is like the bride of Christ, and that Chirst loved the Church, and gave Himself up for her.

It does not seem very prudent to refer to that Church which Christ loved so much as "the whore of Babylon".

1,258 posted on 07/18/2013 7:10:54 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1255 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest

(Posted to wrong post — should have been posted to #1256.)


1,259 posted on 07/18/2013 7:14:02 PM PDT by Heart-Rest (Good reading ==> | ncregister.com | catholic.com | ewtn.com | newadvent.org |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1258 | View Replies]

To: verga
Still waiting for you to explain how God can be both eternal and infinite when you confine Him to space and time which will both end.

Well there you go; space and time which will both end...

You acknowledge that there is space and time and obviously God is in it/them...

The bible doesn't say there is no time...It says there is no beginning nor end of time...

We who believe the bible do not waste our time on what we can not know...But one thing we do know is that time exists and God is operating within that time spectrum, at least for the time being...

Rev 10:6 And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer:

1,260 posted on 07/18/2013 7:26:42 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson