Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: ShadowAce

Ok, so when was the Catholic church founded?


1,081 posted on 07/17/2013 10:50:31 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

So you’re saying that if the Gospel were inaccurate that it would be authoritative?

It’s authoritative because it’s accurate. Again, as St. Paul says, if the Gospel is a lie than we are doomed and we are in our sins.


1,082 posted on 07/17/2013 10:51:37 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

So you’re saying that if the Gospel were inaccurate that it would be authoritative?

It’s authoritative because it’s accurate. Again, as St. Paul says, if the Gospel is a lie than we are doomed and we are in our sins.


1,083 posted on 07/17/2013 10:51:37 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies]

To: verga

I have exactly zero doubt that she’s an ex-Catholic.


1,084 posted on 07/17/2013 10:52:51 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
I see you started first...

Did God teach you that??? Or are you using your uncommon common sense???

So God is still back at Creation creating the earth...And God is opening the Red Sea Right now...And God is sitting on his Throne in the New Jerusalem that he hasn't built yet...

And the Holy Spirit is overcoming the virgin Mary, right now...

That's it, isn't it...You have to somehow justify your 'Mass' where Jesus is dying, every day of the week all over the world...

Essentially, yes that is it, ignoring the snotty ignorant comment

You guys try to push this fable on each other and us that claims Jesus is being Crucified on the Cross, right now...It never ended...It's happening right now...

Funny you guys didn't focus on the end of the Crucifixion where Jesus is being raised...Jesus is being raised right now...

So Jesus is being raised right now, Jesus is being Crucified right now and Jesus is being conceived right now...

You keep your fables, we'll stick with what God actually told us in his scriptures...

Well then I guess the ball is in your court to explain how God is Infinite and Eternal.

1,085 posted on 07/17/2013 10:53:00 AM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies]

To: metmom
It does not.

Wow, you just had the stones to make a comment to a Catholic about a courtesy ping.

1,086 posted on 07/17/2013 10:55:57 AM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: metmom; JCBreckenridge
So, let me get this right....

The CCC and the ex cathedra proclamations of the past popes to not really mean what they said?

IOW, when the pope was infallibly speaking on there being no salvation outside the Catholic church, then it wasn’t really infallible? Or what?

No JC is saying that you just don't comprehend what you are reading.

Tell me how two contradictory things can be true at the same time They aren't just your (Mis)understanding.

1,087 posted on 07/17/2013 10:59:59 AM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
It’s authoritative because it’s accurate.

Incorrect. Josephus wrote plenty of accurate things about biblical events and people--but none of it is Scripture.

Scripture is authoritative because it was authored by God Himself. The people who put pen to parchment were merely scribes.

1,088 posted on 07/17/2013 11:07:31 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1082 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
 
Get Fuzzy
 

Peanuts

1,089 posted on 07/17/2013 11:11:32 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee
Are RC's guilty of some form of Necromancy?

Well; if we contacted DEAD people I guess you'd have a case.

But we only contact LIVE people!

--CatholicDude(Simple; once you think about it!)

1,090 posted on 07/17/2013 11:13:37 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1000 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

Kinda...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesleyan_Church


1,091 posted on 07/17/2013 11:15:43 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1006 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt; teppe; District13; restornu; Normandy
“For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered.”

So THIS is where the MORMONs got THEIR idea from!!




In conclusion let us summarize this grand key, these “Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet”, for our salvation depends on them.


1. The prophet is the only man who speaks for the Lord in everything.
2. The living prophet is more vital to us than the standard works.
3. The living prophet is more important to us than a dead prophet.
4. The prophet will never lead the church astray.
5. The prophet is not required to have any particular earthly training or credentials to speak on any subject or act on any matter at any time.
6. The prophet does not have to say “Thus Saith the Lord,” to give us scripture.
7. The prophet tells us what we need to know, not always what we want to know.
8. The prophet is not limited by men’s reasoning.
9. The prophet can receive revelation on any matter, temporal or spiritual.
10. The prophet may advise on civic matters.
11. The two groups who have the greatest difficulty in following the prophet are the proud who are learned and the proud who are rich.
12. The prophet will not necessarily be popular with the world or the worldly.
13. The prophet and his counselors make up the First Presidency—the highest quorum in the Church.
14. The prophet and the presidency—the living prophet and the First Presidency—follow them and be blessed—reject them and suffer.

I testify that these fourteen fundamentals in following the living prophet are true. If we want to know how well we stand with the Lord then let us ask ourselves how well we stand with His mortal captain—how close do our lives harmonize with the Lord’s anointed—the living Prophet—President of the Church, and with the Quorum of the First Presidency.

Ezra Taft Benson

(Address given Tuesday, February 26, 1980 at Brigham Young University)     http://www.lds.org/liahona/1981/06/fourteen-fundamentals-in-following-the-prophet?lang=eng

1,092 posted on 07/17/2013 11:18:20 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
Thanks for the information. My Mom and sister are Methodist, but I wasn’t aware that there was a separate Wesleyan Church.

There have been some discussions bandied about that the two should unite.

I don't think it'll happen; for we see too much compromise with the world in a lot of Methodist congregations.

If the UMC would clean up THEIR act; then perhaps something may come of the discussions.

1,093 posted on 07/17/2013 11:20:52 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1016 | View Replies]

To: Heart-Rest; metmom
The Supreme Authority for Catholics is Almighty God.

Saying that with the mouth but the heart is far from it - is being hypocritical. Because catholics serve 'man which is evil' and hear/obey their teachings designed to deceived.

CATHOLICS HEAR and OBEY 'man' and their teachings so it's hypocritical to say GOD is their supreme authority.

Isaiah and Jesus already called out those under the thumb of 'man which is evil' as hypocrites. So If GOD IS the catholics' supreme authority they MUST believe HIM when HE said that and REPENT NOW and shame the devil or the HYPOCRITE title is theirs.

"'These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely HUMAN rules." Matthew 15:8,9

Catholics, mormons, muslims are NOT under God's covenant and therefore, on their own and GOD'S PROMISES do NOT belong to them. With deceitful lips they try to claim it but they do NOT have it!

But to the wicked person, God says: "What right have you to recite my laws or take my covenant on your lips? Psalm 50:16

He replied, "Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written: "'These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain; THEIR TEACHINGS are MERELY HUMAN RULES.'

"These rules, which have to do with things that are ALL destined to PERISH with use, are based on MERELY HUMAN RULES and COMMANDS". Colossians 2:22

So the catechism, the book of mormons and koran will be burned up - as they all have been deceived by 'man which is evil'. Catholics, wise up or you will spend eternity learning a lesson you could have learned RIGHT NOW!

A prayer of David. Hear me, LORD, my plea is just; listen to my cry. Hear my prayer-- it does not rise from deceitful lips. "Psalm 17:1

OBEY Jesus The Word or perish.

1,094 posted on 07/17/2013 11:21:35 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Ok fair enough. I was wrong in my guess about what you would say. So...

Fine. Let me just state directly: let’s assume for the sake of our “discussion” that you are right, and that there are some on earth who are just as righteous as those in heaven. ( note, here I’m not agreeing that is the case I’m only putting that issue aside for the moment for the sake of discussion )

Then I don’t see how it’s “bad” to ask those in heaven to also pray for me (in addition to asking any “righteous” here on earth to pray for me). After all, their (the righteous in heaven) prayers can “availeth” at least as much as the (few) righteous here on earth.

Right?

Or now are you going to pull the “those in heaven can’t hear your request to pray for them?” Or do you not believe they (those in heaven, like our departed loved ones for example) care about us anymore? Or maybe you’ll go with the tried (but not true) “it’s necromancy to pray to the dead”.

Or what?

I’m genuinely curious to see what objection you may now offer, if any, given the stipulation I conceded above (that “ok, there are some on earth that are as righteous as those in heaven”)


1,095 posted on 07/17/2013 11:22:11 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
The earliest church fathers mostly used words in their writings which match those words found in those later (Protestant) manuscripts will ignoring those of the Catholic religion...What a coincidence, eh??? Kinda like the Dead Sea Scrolls...

Speaking of WORDS...


The "Caractors" are the only tangible evidence in existence related to Smith's story.
No gold plates, no brass plates, no peep stones, no Urim and Thummim...
only these "Caractors," not a single one of which is in the purported languages.



Smith's translation of the Caractors. According to Martin Harris (Joseph Smith - History, 1:64), "I went to the city of New York, and presented the characters which had been translated, with the translation thereof, to Professor Charles Anthon, a gentleman celebrated for his literary attainments. Professor Anthon stated that the translation was correct, more so than any he had before seen translated from the Egyptian. I then showed him those which were not yet translated,* and he said they were Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyriac, and Arabic; and he said they were true characters."

Speak right up now in all truthfulness. Isn't it revealing how Smith started out making a stab at creating believable "caractors" but quckly gave up and produced nothing but squiggles, ending up wih a series of nothing more than crude little scribbles? Yet Professor Anthon supposedly translated them!

*Harris must have had two or three pieces of paper with him—one with characters and a translation of them (on the same paper or a separate one) and one with untranslated characters—quite likely the "Caractors." Some Mormon "scholars" have gone out on a limb, sawed it off, and knocked themselves out trying to translate from these true Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyriac, and Arabic characters a segment that would correspond with a verse from 1 Nephi.


Modern-day experts in Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyriac, and Arabic. In 1829, any knowledge of these languages possessed by U.S. scholars would have been rudimentary at best. Expertise in them has vastly improved since then. So go ahead, do it. Get any modern expert in these languages to identify which of these "Caractors" are Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyriac and Arabic. Better still, accept the claim of Mormon apologists that Anthon did indeed so testify and that his appraisal of the Caractors was correct. (Op. cit, pp. 73-75)

Save your money! Samples of Assyriac/Aramaic and Arabic writing:



 



What say you? Which of Smith's "Caractors" resemble the Assyriac and Arabic ones? No need to pay experts for their analysis. A child could accurately check this out. These writing systems have remained constant for well over 3000 years.


1,096 posted on 07/17/2013 11:23:41 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1027 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
...here he affirms that Abraham was not dead - he was alive.

Oh?

And you got this info from THIS???


“Before Abraham was I am.”

1,097 posted on 07/17/2013 11:25:04 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
The RCC on the other hand, uses Codex Vaticanus as the primary source text.

Dated... when?

1,098 posted on 07/17/2013 11:25:33 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Wow, can you say it all again with a little more venom, saintly you?!


1,099 posted on 07/17/2013 11:25:45 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
If one is not saved through the Church - than the Bible cannot save anyone.

He said, smugly.

1,100 posted on 07/17/2013 11:26:10 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson