Posted on 01/06/2013 3:56:49 PM PST by NYer
Well, perhaps you could help by showing where I would be wrong in saying that the RCC is in contradiction to scripture. For instance, you could once and for all show us where in scripture the teaching of the assumption of Mary is taught. That would certainly be a start wouldnt it?
Yes, you used past perfect instead of past continuous
Just as the 16th century guy wrote
So we stand here and with open mouth stare heavenward and invent still other keys. Yet Christ says very clearly in Matt 16:19 that he will give the keys to Peter. He does not say he has two kinds of keys, but he gives to Peter the keys he himself has and no others. It is as if he [Christ] were saying: why are you staring heavenward in search of the keys? Do you not understand I gave them to Peter? They are indeed the keys of heaven, but they are not found in heaven. I left them on earth. Dont look for them in heaven or anywhere else except in Peters mouth where I have placed them. Peters mouth is my mouth, and his tongue is my key case. His office is my office, his binding and loosing are my binding and loosing
So we stand here and with open mouth stare heavenward and invent still other keys. Yet Christ says very clearly in Matt 16:19 that he will give the keys to Peter. He does not say he has two kinds of keys, but he gives to Peter the keys he himself has and no others. It is as if he [Christ] were saying: why are you staring heavenward in search of the keys? Do you not understand I gave them to Peter? They are indeed the keys of heaven, but they are not found in heaven. I left them on earth. Dont look for them in heaven or anywhere else except in Peters mouth where I have placed them. Peters mouth is my mouth, and his tongue is my key case. His office is my office, his binding and loosing are my binding and loosing
And just where did you get the idea that I associated myself with any religious organization that did any of those things? It certainly couldnt have been from any posting that I have ever made.
So, just as generation 1-3 of the reformatter said that the "Great Apostasy" arose in the 12th or 16th century, the Baptists pushed it back to the 4th century and the Mormons pushed it back to the Apostles
And now your post above edits the Bible, so I guess the Elsionians push the Great Apostasy to Christ Himself, eh?
Never happened ey? Then I will give you the same challenge. Show from scripture where the RCC gets the concept of the assumption of Mary.
God did, through many means.
Its also interesting that Catholics like to lump all non Catholics into one mind set. I suppose its because they have been taught that its belonging to an organization that merits salvation?
Only the Catholics try to make presbuteros into priest. Its the smoke and mirrors approach using Samaritan religious principles.
very "progressive" of ya!
"like to lump all ninto one mind set." -- yup, lots of differences -- some believe in the Gap theory as you do, others think it is bonkers etc.
here's something from www.dictionary.com for ya
Origin: before 900; Middle English prest ( e ), priest, Old English prēost, ultimately < Late Latin presbyter presbyter
RM -- remember the rules
I do, and that is why I used the modifier apparent. I surmised that your intent was revealed in your sentence:
What's given and protected by the Holy Spirit is hardly flawed
which seemed clearly to refer to the doctrine of catholicity, from which I construct that your intent was to assume that The Holy Ghost gave such a doctrine, thence from it to prove something else. Tell me that I missed something here.
Respectfully --
Just an aside to some who have given too much reverence to "Saint" Peter. I believe the veneration of Peter is misguided. As the "Rock" his seminole declaration of Jesus; "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God," was the point of eternal salvation and the "foundation stone" was this declaration, not the elevation of Peter over any other saint.
The whole thing gets off on the wrong foot without this understanding, and therein a diminuation of the reality of Grace and the expanse of anti-semitism evidenced from the beginning of the Catholic church. JMHO
here's something from www.dictionary.com for ya
Origin: before 900; Middle English prest ( e ), priest, Old English prēost, ultimately < Late Latin presbyter presbyter
And from the Oxford dictionary: Old English prēost, of Germanic origin; related to Dutch priester, German Priester, based on ecclesiastical Latin presbyter 'elder' (see presbyter)
here's something from www.dictionary.com for ya
Origin: before 900; Middle English prest ( e ), priest, Old English prēost, ultimately < Late Latin presbyter presbyter
And from the Oxford dictionary: Old English prēost, of Germanic origin; related to Dutch priester, German Priester, based on ecclesiastical Latin presbyter 'elder' (see presbyter)
and from webster's dictionary Origin of PRIEST
Middle English preist, from Old English prēost, ultimately from Late Latin presbyter more at presbyter First Known Use: before 12th century
So, it's not just the "Catholic Church" who says priest is derived from presbuteros -- why don't you, Cynical bear learn how wrong your beliefs are before continually talking about them?
You presume that the Magisterium actually possess the Holy Spirit ... we Protestants do not presume that.
respectfully... you stated "And that is why the churches loyal to the Real Christ have existed apart from catholicity since the beginning." -- yet, this is historically inaccurate, the Real Christ as seen in orthodoxy has remained throughout
Which are these groups you state that have "always" existed apart from orthodoxy?
Excellent post Elsie!
here's something from www.dictionary.com for ya
Origin: before 900; Middle English prest ( e ), priest, Old English prēost, ultimately < Late Latin presbyter presbyter
And from the Oxford dictionary: Old English prēost, of Germanic origin; related to Dutch priester, German Priester, based on ecclesiastical Latin presbyter 'elder' (see presbyter)
and from webster's dictionary Origin of PRIEST
Middle English preist, from Old English prēost, ultimately from Late Latin presbyter more at presbyter First Known Use: before 12th century
So, it's not just the "Catholic Church" who says priest is derived from presbuteros -- Cynical bear, this is just one of the wrong beliefs you have about orthodoxy, yes? yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.