. Peter had no cross, it was originally the cross of Mithra.
Really? Jesus died on a cross of Mithra as well?
The Greek NT contains Hebrew colloquialisms and puns directly translated to greek from Hebrew, and they make no sense whatsoever in Greek, but to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the Greek MS were translated directly from Hebrew.
They were primarily written by native Aramaic speakers (not Hebrew) and as such would bring their own idiomatic references and structure to the Greek. Try Engrich.com for an illustration of foreigners trying to get the hang of English.
Those Hebrew words and phrases of usually 6 or less words, require whole paragraphs to translate their meanings into Greek, and the greek translators were not sufficiently educated in the Hebrew culture to understand what they were reading.
The Septuagint was translated by (traditionally) 70 rabbis from Alexandria who knew the Jewish culture very well. The rest of the NT has no evidence that it was originally wholly or in part written in Hebrew.
Thanks Yeshua for exposing the fraud!
I think that the nature of the fraud exists at a tangent to your postings.
You’re allowing yourself to be deluded.
There is nothing Aramaic related to the gospels. They were written in Hebrew, and the Hebrew Colloquy (definitely not Aramaic) that got translated into the Greek copies is perfect proof that the originals had to be Hebrew. Hebrew puns can’t be translated into any other language with meaning, just as English puns cannot be translated into spanish and make sense.
The Greek translators didn’t realize that they even were puns, that is the irony, but it serves to give us the truth.
.
>> “Really? Jesus died on a cross of Mithra as well?” <<
.
Honestly, is that what serves for logic in your mind?
The ‘cross’ Yeshua died on was the standard 6’ long wood timber that was placed on the top of a post that was permanently set in the soil.
The cross of Mithra that the RCC decided to adopt and call the cross of Peter is a bit different than that, isn't it!