Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr
> “Peter had no cross, it was originally the cross of Mithra.”

.
>> “Really? Jesus died on a cross of Mithra as well?” <<

.
Honestly, is that what serves for logic in your mind?

The ‘cross’ Yeshua died on was the standard 6’ long wood timber that was placed on the top of a post that was permanently set in the soil.

The cross of Mithra that the RCC decided to adopt and call the cross of Peter is a bit different than that, isn't it!

190 posted on 12/28/2012 2:37:44 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
>> “Really? Jesus died on a cross of Mithra as well?” <<

. Honestly, is that what serves for logic in your mind? The ‘cross’ Yeshua died on was the standard 6’ long wood timber that was placed on the top of a post that was permanently set in the soil.

Oho, you now profess the tau cross? If that is so, then how was the sign "Jesus King of the Jews" nailed above His head?

The cross of Mithra that the RCC decided to adopt and call the cross of Peter is a bit different than that, isn't it!

All of Christianity believes in the traditional cross and not the tau cross.

195 posted on 12/29/2012 7:03:46 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson