Replies

You’re allowing yourself to be deluded.

There is nothing Aramaic related to the gospels. They were written in Hebrew, and the Hebrew Colloquy (definitely not Aramaic) that got translated into the Greek copies is perfect proof that the originals had to be Hebrew. Hebrew puns can’t be translated into any other language with meaning, just as English puns cannot be translated into spanish and make sense.

The Greek translators didn’t realize that they even were puns, that is the irony, but it serves to give us the truth.

You’re allowing yourself to be deluded. There is nothing Aramaic related to the gospels. They were written in Hebrew, and the Hebrew Colloquy (definitely not Aramaic) that got translated into the Greek copies is perfect proof that the originals had to be Hebrew. Hebrew puns can’t be translated into any other language with meaning, just as English puns cannot be translated into spanish and make sense.

Okay, produce some proofs. Some fragments, some early communications that it was so. I'll bet that you cannot tell the difference between Aramaic and Hebrew anyway, so who are you relying on for this information?

The Greek translators didn’t realize that they even were puns, that is the irony, but it serves to give us the truth.

Interesting. Let's see who you think wrote the Gospels and who you think translated them into Greek, and where you think that the "original Hebrew Gospels" were dustbinned.