I always carefully consider the wording of my post and substantiate it. Luther is definitely a liar and a crook, who started a religion because the one Jesus started did not allow for his low passions, then spent the rest of his life lying about it.
That's good!!
Luther is definitely a liar and a crook, who started a religion because the one Jesus started did not allow for his low passions, then spent the rest of his life lying about it.
OH?
I'll be here all day - take your time.
You have substantiated very little, and nothing objectively, while Luther clearly rejected faith as being saving without works. http://peacebyjesus.tripod.com/reformation_faith_works.html
And before you begin posting select quote from your comrades who are driven by hatred of Luther, do some checking here:http://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2005/12/martin-luther-topical-master-index-for.html
Meanwhile, Luther himself is largely irrelevant and a red herring, as your predominate error is supposing we must follow him as an infallible pope, rather then being one of many who objected to Rome on Scriptural grounds, the supreme authority of that being the issue.
And some of which dissenters were murdered, but which you stand behind, and have expressed longing to see the Inquisition return, and your exclusion of torture (etc.) - the basis (for that of the CCC) you failed to substantiate - is highly questionable as a permanent injunction.