You have substantiated very little, and nothing objectively, while Luther clearly rejected faith as being saving without works. http://peacebyjesus.tripod.com/reformation_faith_works.html
And before you begin posting select quote from your comrades who are driven by hatred of Luther, do some checking here:http://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2005/12/martin-luther-topical-master-index-for.html
Meanwhile, Luther himself is largely irrelevant and a red herring, as your predominate error is supposing we must follow him as an infallible pope, rather then being one of many who objected to Rome on Scriptural grounds, the supreme authority of that being the issue.
And some of which dissenters were murdered, but which you stand behind, and have expressed longing to see the Inquisition return, and your exclusion of torture (etc.) - the basis (for that of the CCC) you failed to substantiate - is highly questionable as a permanent injunction.
What do you want me to substantiate?
Luther clearly rejected faith as being saving without works.
Good, if true. If only he repented of his schism, put his "wife" and himself back into monasteries where they belonged and spent the rest of his days covering his fat head with ashes, things would have been much better for him and for everyone else.
Luther himself is largely irrelevant
After trying to explain away his "marriage" and his "Sole Fide" idiocy, you are telling me? Yes, he as a person is not relevant; that there are people apparently quite fond of him is.