To: Cronos; HarleyD
False -- scripture is inerrant, not infallible. Persons who read scripture are fallible or not, hence the wide differences in interpretation. So .... specifically, what parts of Scripture are fallible?
76 posted on
05/04/2012 1:06:30 PM PDT by
metmom
( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: metmom; Cronos; HarleyD
"So .... specifically, what parts of Scripture are fallible?"That is a question that ignores the nature of Scripture and violates proper English grammar. It is an errant question and the one who posed it is therefore fallible.
Scripture by definition is inerrant, a state of being completely without error. Fallibility or infallibility describes actions relative to the ability to err. To refer to Scripture as fallible or infallible assigns to the ability to act, which it does not have.
79 posted on
05/04/2012 1:32:14 PM PDT by
Natural Law
(For God so loved the world that He did not send a book.)
To: metmom
Really? Do you believe the Bible has errors?!! Wow
No, the Bible is inerrant.
80 posted on
05/04/2012 1:34:02 PM PDT by
Cronos
(**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
To: metmom; Cronos
Persons who read scripture are fallible or not, hence the wide differences in interpretation. How is that for a laugh! ALL persons whether they read Scripture or not are fallible! Reading it doesn't make anyone infallible. It's ONLY God's WORD that is pure of error - never man.
90 posted on
05/05/2012 8:22:02 AM PDT by
presently no screen name
( VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson