“I have looked over the thread and find that you indeed are defining how individuals can vote or determine FOR THEMSELVES”
But you decline to cite examples because you and your friends are full of it.
Cite examples in context. You won’t find them. My position has been that you and your friends have been trying to define “Approved Religions” of which you exclude at least Muslims and Mormons - probably others, but I don’t know - the existence of even ONE has no Constitutional basis. #404 and many other places in the thread show this error in thinking.
You’re the ones that are trying to determine which candidates are even allowed to run for office/hold office. I called you out and you guys have been apoplectic, as bullies often are, when faced with a metaphorical sock in the face.
So go back to your nasty little huddle, study the Constitution, and be consistent from here on out, will you, please?
It’s all in the 1st Amendment. It was so important to our founding fathers that they put it there first. The reason is obvious - people like you guys who hate one religion or another and don’t want adherents to participate in our democracy like every other American has the right to do by running for office.
A couple of you have all ready stepped away from this gaggle nonsense. The rest of you should too by affirming the 1st Amendment. I absolutely and resolutely support the right of Mormon (or any other religion) candidates to run for office. I don’t care what crazy religious beliefs they may have - I support their right to run for office, and/or vote any way they wish, for whatever reason.
When you, the gaggle, vote as individuals - pull the lever for whomever you want for whatever reason you wish.
Hold this thought.
When you, the gaggle, vote as individuals - pull the lever for whomever you want for whatever reason you wish.
____________________________________________
We do and will...RomneyBot
but we will still wont be voting for Willie Mitty...
I cited the thread in my very first statement. If this basic fact is too simple for your superior mind I am obviously incapable of making it complex enough for one so far above me to be comfortable with.
However since you say I need to “study” the Constitution and be consistent I would be more than interested to learn what flaws and inconsistencies you find in my lesson.
I would certainly benefit from your obvious expertise...
I cited the thread in my very first statement. If this basic fact is too simple for your superior mind I am obviously incapable of making it complex enough for one so far above me to be comfortable with.
However since you say I need to “study” the Constitution and be consistent I would be more than interested to learn what flaws and inconsistencies you find in my lesson.
I would certainly benefit from your obvious expertise...
The rest of you should too by affirming the 1st Amendment. I absolutely and resolutely support the right of Mormon (or any other religion) candidates to run for office. I don’t care what crazy religious beliefs they may have - I support their right to run for office, and/or vote any way they wish, for whatever reason.
- - - - —
Hogwash. You have been on here claiming we are unamerican for refusing to vote for Romney for whatever reason we choose.
No one here has said Mormons can’t RUN, but we do not have to discount or ignore their religion as a factor in our voting.
You are the only one on here claiming that, where is your support. There are still plenty of us on here who don’t support Romney.