Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Mary Have Other Children?
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry ^ | Unknown | Matt Slick

Posted on 06/13/2011 3:57:07 PM PDT by HarleyD

One of the more controversial teachings of the Catholic church deals with the perpetual virginity of Mary. This doctrine maintains that Mary remained a virgin after the birth of Jesus and that biblical references suggesting Jesus had siblings are really references to cousins (Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 510).

As the veneration of Mary increased throughout the centuries, the vehicle of Sacred Tradition became the means of promoting new doctrines not explicitly taught in the Bible. The virginity of Mary is clearly taught in scripture when describing the birth of Jesus. But is the doctrine of her continued virginity supported by the Bible? Did Mary lose her virginity after Jesus was born? Does the Bible reveal that Mary had other children, that Jesus had brothers and sisters?

The Bible does not come out and declare that Mary remained a virgin and that she had no children. In fact, the Bible seems to state otherwise: (All quotes are from the NASB.)

An initial reading of these biblical texts seems to clear up the issue: Jesus had brothers and sisters. But such obvious scriptures are not without their response from Catholic Theologians. The primary argument against these biblical texts is as follows:

In Greek, the word for brother is adelphos and sister is adelphe. This word is used in different contexts: of children of the same parents (Matt. 1:2; 14:3), descendants of parents (Acts 7:23, 26; Heb. 7:5), the Jews as a whole (Acts 3:17, 22), etc. Therefore, the term brother (and sister) can and does refer to the cousins of Jesus.

There is certainly merit in this argument, However, different contexts give different meanings to words. It is not legitimate to say that because a word has a wide scope of meaning, that you may then transfer any part of that range of meaning to any other text that uses the word. In other words, just because the word brother means fellow Jews or cousin in one place, does not mean it has the same meaning in another. Therefore, each verse should be looked at in context to see what it means.

Lets briefly analyze a couple of verses dealing with the brothers of Jesus.

In both of these verses, if the brothers of Jesus are not brothers, but His cousins, then who is His mother and who is the carpenters father? In other words, mother here refers to Mary. The carpenter in Matt. 13:55, refers to Joseph. These are literal. Yet, the Catholic theologian will then stop there and say, "Though carpenters son refers to Joseph, and mother refers to Mary, brothers does not mean brothers, but "cousins." This does not seem to be a legitimate assertion. You cannot simply switch contextual meanings in the middle of a sentence unless it is obviously required. The context is clear. This verse is speaking of Joseph, Mary, and Jesus brothers. The whole context is of familial relationship: father, mother, and brothers.

Psalm 69, A Messianic Psalm

There are many arguments pro and con concerning Jesus siblings. But the issue cannot be settled without examining Psalm 69, a Messianic Psalm. Jesus quotes Psalm 69:4 in John 15:25, "But they have done this in order that the word may be fulfilled that is written in their Law, they hated Me without a cause."

He also quotes Psalm 69:9 in John 2:16-17, "and to those who were selling the doves He said, "Take these things away; stop making My Fathers house a house of merchandise." His disciples remembered that it was written, "Zeal for Thy house will consume me."

Clearly, Psalm 69 is a Messianic Psalm since Jesus quoted it in reference to Himself two times. The reason this is important is because of what is written between the verses that Jesus quoted.

To get the whole context, here is Psalm 69:4-9, "Those who hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of my head; Those who would destroy me are powerful, being wrongfully my enemies, What I did not steal, I then have to restore. 5O God, it is Thou who dost know my folly, And my wrongs are not hidden from Thee. 6May those who wait for Thee not be ashamed through me, O Lord God of hosts; May those who seek Thee not be dishonored through me, O God of Israel, 7Because for Thy sake I have borne reproach; Dishonor has covered my face. 8I have become estranged from my brothers, and an alien to my mothers sons. 9For zeal for Thy house has consumed me, And the reproaches of those who reproach Thee have fallen on me."

This messianic Psalm clearly shows that Jesus has brothers. As Amos 3:7 says, "Surely the Lord God does nothing unless He reveals His secret counsel to His servants the prophets." Gods will has been revealed plainly in the New Testament and prophetically in the Old. Psalm 69 shows us that Jesus had brothers.

Did Mary have other children? The Bible seems to suggest yes. Catholic Tradition says no. Which will you trust?

Of course, the Catholic will simply state that even this phrase "my mother's sons" is in reference not to his siblings, but to cousins and other relatives. This is a necessary thing for the Catholic to say, otherwise, the perpetual virginity of Mary is threatened and since that contradicts Roman Catholic tradition, an interpretation that is consistent with that tradition must be adopted.

The question is, "Was Jesus estranged by His brothers?". Yes, He was. John 7:5 says "For not even His brothers were believing in Him." Furthermore, Psalm 69:8 says both "my brothers" and "my mother's sons." Are these both to be understood as not referring to His siblings? Hardly. The Catholics are fond of saying that "brothers" must mean "cousins." But, if that is the case, then when we read "an alien to my mother's sons" we can see that the writer is adding a further distinction and narrowing the scope of meaning. In other words, Jesus was alienated by his siblings, His very half-brothers begotten from Mary.

It is sad to see the Roman Catholic church go to such lengths to maintain Mary's virginity, something that is a violation of biblical law to be married and fill the earth.


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: brothers; cousins; mary; nameonebrother; relatives; stepchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,021-1,026 next last
To: Titanites
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.

Careful, you're going to hurt yourself if you keep posting scripture to try and justify your false teaching...

As you posted, hear what the Holy Spirit has to say, NOT your Church...

And that's just what the bible teaches and what we believe...

541 posted on 06/17/2011 6:10:22 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; boatbums; Natural Law; MarkBsnr; Titanites; James C. Bennett; LeGrande
botabums to Cronos: It looks like your lil' buddy Cronos could use some of that thar edumacation. His needle is stuck on perseverating Quix about people supposedly tied around his neck for stupid things they have said in the past and also PNSN for the wrong accusations of Islamist behavior. :o)

Cronos to boatbums: It's amazing how contradictory your posts are -- not only on religion but also on mundane matters. On the one hand "crib, crub, ENOUGH, no personal remarks" and one the other hand your posts do the same (Kosta's got a nice list of these too). Aren't those posts hypocritical?...

I see that even with my absence, when there are no agnostics or atheists to badger, Christians—left to their own devices—just smother each other with the love of Christ. Aaaah, that wonderful agape at work...2,000 years, bonefires, daggers and counting... :)

What does that Bible verse say "For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.” [Matthew 18:20]? Musthave meant someone else...

542 posted on 06/17/2011 6:11:45 AM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
pnsm: When 'It's ALL about JESUS' is too difficult to understand - it's obvious, the lights are out.

We Christians say Jesus is God. Moslems consider Him just a prophet.

Leave us Christians (Lutherans, Presbyterians, Catholics, Pentecostals) etc. to discuss these among ourselves, thank you.

543 posted on 06/17/2011 6:12:08 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Iscool: Adelphos does not differentiate between a blood brother or other.

Nice -- do you know Greek? Which Greek? Koine?

Did you note my post said brother has shades of meaning because Aramaic and other Semitic languages do not differentiate between a blood brother/sister and a cousin or other

For your education, Greek is an indo-European language, not a Semitic language

544 posted on 06/17/2011 6:17:34 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
the gospel writer translting to Greek from Aramaic/hebrew.

If only you had even a microscopic shred of evidence to this claim...

545 posted on 06/17/2011 6:18:43 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Now, did you know that there are such things as cases? Genitive, Locative, Nominative, Dative, Vocative, Instrumental and Accusative?

Do you know any language that has gender assigned to inanimate words like rock, chair, bridge, etc.?

546 posted on 06/17/2011 6:19:17 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

Did Mary have other children? The Bible seems to suggest yes. Catholic Tradition says no. Which will you trust?


I do not know of any place that the Bible says yes, but one scripture does a resounding no and other scriptures indicate a no.

John ch 19
26When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! 27Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.

Some people would have every one believe that the woman who bore and raised the son of God also bore other children who were also followers of Jesus but so noacount that they could not even care for their own mother.

and this is plus the other scriptures that indicate the same thing

I think any one who would buy that just have not give it much thought.

There is no mention of Mary having other children.

This seems to be just a protestant and Catholic thing, the protestants will go to any length to let the world know that they believe the Catholic,s are a false church, but on more important issues like changing the sabbath from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week, they have swallowed that hook, line and sinker.

I do not know for sure who the supposed brethren of Jesus were but i really believe that the protestant Churches are the daughters of the Catholic church, and no i am not a seventh day advent.


547 posted on 06/17/2011 6:19:52 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Careful, you're going to hurt yourself if you keep posting scripture to try and justify your false teaching...

I posted nothing but Scripture. I can't help it if you believe Scripture is false teaching.

As you posted, hear what the Holy Spirit has to say, NOT your Church...

Well, I'm sure that's what some want to believe is what the Scriptue I posted says. But it's not. The Scripture actually says "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." Did you catch that last part - to the churches? Not what the Holy Spirit says to you personally, but what it says to the churches. Can you see the difference between what the Scripture says and what you posted?

And that's just what the bible teaches and what we believe...

Yeah right, except for that little problem with truncation. Seriously, y'alls twisting, turning, mutilating, and hacking of Scripture is a joke. Listen to the churches, as the Holy Spirit guides them; not you.

548 posted on 06/17/2011 6:25:43 AM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

I’m Catholic, but frankly never had a problem with the concept that Mary could have had other kids. However, the verses you listed, the point you make - that is pretty convincing. Thank you very very much.


549 posted on 06/17/2011 6:35:03 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; boatbums

Indeed, Cronos, he does a fine job perseverating while at the same time whining about it. Yes, that’s hypocrisy.


550 posted on 06/17/2011 6:35:12 AM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
So, let's see -- do you say that Jesus spoke in Greek? Which Greek? Koine?

Do you even know the difference between Greek and Aramaic/Hebrew?

Do you even know the difference between a semitic and an Indo-European language?

Do you know any other language besides English?

your posts have before shown an utter lack of knowledge that there are such things as cases: Genitive, Locative, Nominative, Dative, Vocative, Instrumental and Accusative in a language

Do you know what these are for?

551 posted on 06/17/2011 6:36:24 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
it's not a "protestant" v/s Catholic thing --> because to many Lutherans and Anglicans this is a true belief (not to all of course) -- because for Luther and Calvin this was true and they believed in this as the apostolic faith

Even in the 1800s, a Lutheran Scholar (Franz Pierper) said for in his Christian dogmatics that the perpetual virginity is the traditional view (in his opinion) for Lutherans.

They knew that if this was removed, the next step was denial of Christ's divinity -- as we see among many of the non-catholic posters here.

552 posted on 06/17/2011 6:42:31 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies]

To: Titanites; Iscool
titan to iscool: I can't help it if you believe Scripture is false teaching.

It's sad, isn't it? To talk empty rhetoric as if one knew more than the people who knew Christ is just egotistical.

553 posted on 06/17/2011 6:43:50 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Titanites; boatbums
bb is a 'she' ;-P, but yeah, the posts that alternately whine about 'ooh, personal attacks' and then a post that launches one is pretty hypocritical

It's like the maroon who talks about extra-biblical stuff and then says "oh, it's ok -- as long as it's one of my song-and-dance pastors"

Sheesh, these B-A'er groups like boatbums's fall under their own contradictions.

554 posted on 06/17/2011 6:45:50 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Your denial aside, the Holy Traditions of the Church comprise a lot of it.

I keep hearing you guys sayin' that but what was revealed, to whom and when??? Surely you've got 'something' to offer to back up your claim...

555 posted on 06/17/2011 7:02:20 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; Natural Law
iscool: I keep hearing you guys sayin' that but what was revealed, to whom and when

John 21:25 "25And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen."

Now, what Jesus did was to ensure that His disciples didn't come up with their own intepretations, but to stick to the faith He handed them

hence the need for the Apostles to ensure that their disciples and successors stuck to the faith taught to THEM by Jesus Christ.

hence we believe in the Faith as taught by the Ultimate teachers, Jesus Christ and handed down through the Apostles -- the Apostolic faith in the ONE Holy Catholic Apostolic Church

556 posted on 06/17/2011 7:13:52 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; Natural Law
As I asked you:

Do you even know the difference between Greek and Aramaic/Hebrew?

Do you even know the difference between a semitic and an Indo-European language?

Do you know any other language besides English?

your posts have before shown an utter lack of knowledge that there are such things as cases: Genitive, Locative, Nominative, Dative, Vocative, Instrumental and Accusative in a language

Do you know what these are for?

Neither do your posts reveal any knowledge on the bible, yet arguments based on hot air -- why?

557 posted on 06/17/2011 7:14:41 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Were all that is necessary containable in a Book God would have repeated the Mosaic process and sent the Gospel on Stone Tablets. Instead He sent His Son to establish a Church.

But then you are calling the Apostle John a liar...Why should we believe John lied but you and your religion are telling the truth???

1Jn 5:13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

Joh 20:31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.

John didn't lie...

558 posted on 06/17/2011 7:22:30 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
Well, I'm sure that's what some want to believe is what the Scriptue I posted says. But it's not. The Scripture actually says "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." Did you catch that last part - to the churches? Not what the Holy Spirit says to you personally, but what it says to the churches. Can you see the difference between what the Scripture says and what you posted?

I sure can...And there is no difference...I am the church...

559 posted on 06/17/2011 7:43:08 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
"John didn't lie..."

No he didn't, but unless you are claiming that the entire Word, including the Word incarnate, can be completely contained within a book, or that John is claiming that his own writings contain all of the Word the passage clearly doesn't mean what you are implying.

560 posted on 06/17/2011 7:51:40 AM PDT by Natural Law (For God so loved the world He did not send a book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,021-1,026 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson