Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apparitions Exposed!
Proclaiming the Gospel ^ | former Director for a "Mary, Queen of Peace Center."

Posted on 04/12/2011 7:55:27 AM PDT by bkaycee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,861-1,8801,881-1,9001,901-1,920 ... 2,741-2,750 next last
To: D-fendr
John 6:23-53 - however, a symbolic interpretation is not plausible. Throughout these verses, the Greek text uses the word "phago" nine times. "Phago" literally means "to eat" or "physically consume." Like the Protestants of our day, the disciples take issue with Jesus' literal usage of "eat." So Jesus does what?>
etc
etc.

The following site, among others, copied your words exactly without even giving a hint of credit to you. Shame, shame!

Shameless plagarism.

FWIW, since no manuscript exists which is younger than 300-400 years old it is presumptuous to claim to know the exact Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, or whatever, words used.

1,881 posted on 04/19/2011 10:32:49 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1720 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
The difference which is pretty clear to anyone reading this thread is that when Christians criticize the RCC,

Hold it! The word "Christians" is set up in the sentence to indicate opposition to "RCC" when in fact, the first and only Christians for 1500 years were Catholic.

those criticisms involve the anti-Scriptural beliefs and practices of the RCC,

Just a cotton-pickin minute here! That statement assumes (yes, big mistake to "assume") that the beliefs and practices of the "RCC" -- a shorthand meaning Catholic Church -- are somehow anti-Scriptural. The author of this "assuming" post has not established anything of the kind.

whereas the "strong language" you seem to employ is simply name-calling.

Heh. Makes no sense.

There's no core to your argument. No discussion of faith, practices, beliefs, perspectives, ideology, theology, etc.

Likewise, no core to your argument. No discussion of faith, practices, beliefs, perspectives, ideology, theology, etc. Pot kettle black, as usual.

This is a typical Dr. Eckleburg post which makes no actual argument, but simply makes unsupported assertions with no actual reasoning involved.

1,882 posted on 04/19/2011 10:36:59 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1874 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE

And this is not the first time by any means that such plagiarism has happened.

What with the tone of this thread and the continual deception of passing off plagiarized material as their own, one is left wondering if there’s any moral integrity left in Catholicism.


1,883 posted on 04/19/2011 10:37:29 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1881 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I recall there are some sects that no longer have any members. A group of quaker women whose sect’s doctrine did not permit sex. The sect died out, but it has a museum now, I think.


1,884 posted on 04/19/2011 10:37:43 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1879 | View Replies]

To: metmom

When you say “one is left wondering”,
does that mean
your entire congregation is left wondering?

I want to have the right mental image of your sect’s confusion.


1,885 posted on 04/19/2011 10:41:30 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1883 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

cf: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2703506/posts?page=1877#1877


1,886 posted on 04/19/2011 10:42:56 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1882 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; Cronos; MarkBsnr; Dr. Eckleburg

Dr. Eckleburg’s sect is the Orthodox Presbyterian Church.

Cronos and MarkBsnr can tell you all about it.

It ain’t pretty.

If you start typing in Orthodox Presbyterian Church into bing, “Orthodox Presbyterian Church cult” is the fourth listing on the downdrop and for good reason.


1,887 posted on 04/19/2011 10:43:02 AM PDT by WPaCon (Obama: pansy progressive, mad Mohammedan, or totalitarian tyrant? Or all three?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1877 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama
This has been my 1st foray into the Religion Forum and it will be my last. I’ll gladly discuss politics publicly but have no desire to be a part of the juvenile tactics of using “sects” as innuendo, etc. I find it quite distasteful. I’ve never been considered a prude, however, I would NEVER post some of the things that have been posted here in the name of religion!

Well, when I first came onto the Religion Forum to find like-minded Christians of all stripes who wanted to discuss mutual love of God and all things related, I found much the same as you found. Sadly, everywhere I turned, every remark I made was ridiculed, dogpiled, laughed at, and my Church was dragged through the mud with every post. When I complained, as you are doing, I was told to stick to the ecumenical and caucus threads, since I was clearly too thin-skinned to participate in open Religion Forum threads, which are "anything goes" unless it is Catholics making an effective argument.

Just take a look at the anti-Catholic posts. I cannot imagine Christ Jesus, Risen Son of Almighty God and the Blessed Virgin Mary, saying the things about the Catholic Church that pass for everyday ordinary conversation on the RF, either. So, I commiserate with you. Ain't it awful? If we can't defend our faith, or can't handle the heat, we just don't belong here. Nope. No way.

1,888 posted on 04/19/2011 10:43:29 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1875 | View Replies]

To: WPaCon

I will have to remember to occassionally use “your cult’s” when talking to Miss Eckles.

My preference is “your sect’s”.


1,889 posted on 04/19/2011 10:45:31 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1887 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

Thanks!


1,890 posted on 04/19/2011 10:47:15 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1886 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Notwithstanding
It goes to show the extremes some people will go to to deflect attention from something which makes their religion appear in an unfavorable light.

Sorry that your foray onto the RF should be greeted in such a juvenile fashion.

Those claiming to be Christians should hold themselves to a higher standard of behavior than that. I can’t imagine how anyone who would refer to themselves as a Christian would resort to such vulgar tactics. Christians are supposed to be followers of Christ.

Could you imagine Christ making those kind of innuendos about people and their character? No wonder the non-religious consider religious people hypocrites. Sometimes the world has a better handle on what is appropriate behavior for those who name the name of Christ to behave like than those who make the claim.

Notwithstanding, the feigned outrage at your behavior is hilarious.

1,891 posted on 04/19/2011 10:47:19 AM PDT by WPaCon (Obama: pansy progressive, mad Mohammedan, or totalitarian tyrant? Or all three?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1880 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

I’ll throw a little out to that!

Blessed be God in His angels and in His saints!


1,892 posted on 04/19/2011 10:47:43 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1888 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Notwithstanding

“It goes to show the extremes some people will go to to deflect attention from something which makes their religion appear in an unfavorable light.”

An article filled with the grossest distortions, falsehoods and plain garbage deserves nothing less than the loudest raspberry!

The posts you apparently object to are ABSOLUTE MIRRORS of the ones posted by the faux protestant sects and comfy-chair-missionaries-of the church of-one who object to being ridiculed in the same manner.

Sometimes, the truth has to hurt to show y’all that your behavior is completely unchristian and vile.


1,893 posted on 04/19/2011 10:47:51 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1880 | View Replies]

To: WPaCon

Oh, sure, but let a Catholic, either a child or an old lady, be offended by innuendo and slur against the Blessed Mother, and they are told, “You are too thin-skinned for the RF open threads, quit whining and go to the ecumenical and caucus threads.”


1,894 posted on 04/19/2011 10:50:25 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1891 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Psst: To being you up to speed, as of today, Catholics are not allowed to express any e___ulations in the RF, so Mad Dawg and I now use code to get around that rule. Of course e___ulation is literally a joyful “little throwing out”.

.
.
.
.
.
Thus my: “I’ll throw a little out to that!”


1,895 posted on 04/19/2011 10:51:27 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1888 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

Heck yeah!

OOPS!

PS, I saw that silly exchange.


1,896 posted on 04/19/2011 10:53:01 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies]

To: WPaCon

“Notwithstanding, the feigned outrage at your behavior is hilarious”

What I find hilarious is the insistance that American protestantism and English is THE causa sine qua non of the entire world.

causa sine qua non - Latin archaic

Meaning: indispensable cause or condition IOW The REASON TO BE


1,897 posted on 04/19/2011 10:54:25 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1891 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; presently no screen name
Mary is quoted several times in the new testament.

Yes, and the quotes show she too had not yet learned nor understood who Jesus was.

For example:

Luke 2:48 And when they saw him they were astonished; and his mother said to him, "Son, why have you treated us so? Behold, your father and I have been looking for you anxiously."

1,898 posted on 04/19/2011 10:55:28 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1727 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; RnMomof7; metmom; boatbums; Quix; the_conscience; wmfights; HarleyD; marbren; Lera; ...
(yes, big mistake to "assume")

No, it's not always a "mistake" to assume. Not when all evidence points to a consistent, glaring conclusion.

Here is a handy web page I just found...

ROMAN CATHOLICISM VS. SCRIPTURE
The 62 Errors of the Roman Catholic Church

1,899 posted on 04/19/2011 10:57:37 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1882 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE

Yeah,

We just have to accept your view non-biblical that

Mary and Joe

forgot all about

the visits and dreams

where angels told them

who Jesus was.


1,900 posted on 04/19/2011 11:00:58 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1898 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,861-1,8801,881-1,9001,901-1,920 ... 2,741-2,750 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson