Replies

You wrote:

“All this time you’ve been avoiding posting in threads tagged [Vanity] because you’re not vain?”

Most vanity threads I have seen do not interest me. This was not marked as a vanity thread that I saw. I did, however, see this: “[Mormonism/Anti-Christianity]”. I asked “Anti-Christianity?”

“Or have you been able to distinguish between parenthetic descriptors and caucus tags because you cleverly notice the presence or absence of the word caucus?”

Whether or not I can distinguish one or the other is irrelevant. I asked “Anti-Christianity?” If it was a caucus title, it apparently is not now since it has disappeared from the thread title as far as I can see. Since you posted it in the thread title, and it has apparently been removed, it seems that you are the one who can not distinguish between parenthetic descriptors and caucus tags. That would not surprise me.

I concede that there are some who are easily confused (or who pose as the confused for ulterior motives).

At any rate the Religion Moderator has clarified a misunderstanding about the use of the “Other Non-Christian” topic in posts so I will be using that option as a means of tagging the anti-Christian nature of Mormonism in future posts.

I can appreciate well executed posturing to make a point. Your aggrieved FReeper ploy about caucus confusion seem somewhat strange to me though.

As a devout and well educated Catholic, doesn't coming to the defense of Mormonism over an anti-Christian descriptor leave a little bit of a bad taste in your mouth? I mean statements from Mormon hierarchs like Bruce McConlie like, "The Roman Catholic Church specifically -- singled out, set apart, described and designated as being 'most abominable above all other churches' ( Ne. 13:5)" are poignantly anti-Christian.