This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 02/23/2011 7:05:41 AM PST by Religion Moderator, reason:
Old scandal article |
Posted on 02/08/2011 7:12:21 AM PST by Gamecock
HINDUS HAVE applauded Pope Benedict for including verse from ancient Hindu scripture Upanishads in the Good Friday Meditations and Prayers led by him at Roman Colosseum.
Acclaimed Hindu statesman Rajan Zed, in a statement in Nevada (USA) today, said that it was a remarkable gesture from Pope and invited him to study more ancient Hindu scriptures, which were very rich in philosophical thought. He or other Hindu scholars would gladly provide the help and resources in this regard, if asked, Zed added.
Zed, who is president of Universal Society of Hinduism, also commended His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI for inclusion of a verse from Indias Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagores Gitanjali and reference to peace icon Mahatma Gandhi in these prayers.
This years 'Way of the Cross at the Colesseum' Meditations and Prayers on Good Friday, led by Pope, included well-known verse from Brahadaranyakopanishad (Lead me from the unreal to the real, from darkness to light, from death to immortality), line from Tagores Gitanjali (Give me the strength to make my love fruitful in service) and reference to Mahatma Gandhi.
Rajan Zed stressed that all religions should work together for a just and peaceful world. Dialogue would bring us mutual enrichment, he added.
Pope Benedict heads the Roman Catholic Church, which is the largest of the Christian denominations. Hinduism, oldest and third largest religion of the world, has about one billion adherents and moksha (liberation) is its ultimate goal.
As opposed to snippets of anti-protestantism found on Catholic Apologetic sites? I'm not the one elevating a magisterium ABOVE Christ. YOU ARE. Be careful that projection thing is showing again.
Wow Excellent post !!!
I would only complain that conservative Presbyterians were lumped in with PCUSA heretics.. I can say with some confidence that in my church not one member would say Jesus sinned.. maybe 10 or 15 % of casual attenders..
The information you give is awesome..I am going to “steal it” :)
***GRIN**
On the other hand these posts remain without chastisement:
#363 where Cronos stated, Why do you worship Satan? and
#365 where Cronos posted an image suggesting my Pastor is a satanic snake handler and
Post #366 where Cronos asks, And how's the new group symbol coming on since your group rejected the cross? Then:
#367where Im told, do stop repeating the lie and: #372 where Im snidely lumped in with Anton LeVay with the statement, The problem is that many people are completely taken up by Anton LeVay and then deny Christ.
FR religion forum rules state: On all threads, but particularly open threads, posters must never make it personal. Reading minds and attributing motives are forms of making it personal.
Im not sure how any of the above doesnt violate the rules of making it personal, or for that matter trying to provoke a flame war, but apparently those statements and actions are allowed. But posting a picture from a forbidden site is not. Oh well, Ill take it as a complement Cronos needed to resort to those tactics, it is what it is.
Since I still believe it is not the position of FR to have a privileged membership list where some are given special rights to violate the rules and others are not; therefore, I still believe as well that FR will allow me a position of self-defense when accused of being a Satanist. If I'm wrong and this post is pulled while the above posts remain, then it will be apparent there is a privilged class of FR members.
So I will post the same pic from a CATHOLIC site that is not on any forbidden lists (as I assume that would be allowed):
A gentle reminder to Cronos regarding my Satanism My churchs cross is rightside up. Yours is upside down. Enough said.
LOL! You’re going to have to do better than that. The vast majority of crucifixes/crosses in Catholic churches/contexts are in the right orientation. The upside-down is sometimes used in the papal context NOT for the Satanic reason, but because St. Peter was CRUCIFIED UPSIDE-DOWN.
Papal context? Satanic symbols are okay in a papal context?
Wow. You're going to have to do better than using the Peter example, that's just the most ridiculous spin I've ever heard. Holy cow. Oh geez - sorry - shouldn't have used that expression, you might be using bovine symbols next.
From wikipedia:
The origin of this symbol comes from the Catholic tradition that Simon Peter was crucified upside down, as told by Origen of Alexandria. The tradition first appears in the “Martyrdom of Peter”, a fragmented text found in, but likely predating, the apocryphal Acts of Peter, which was written no later than 200 A.D. It is believed that Peter requested this form of crucifixion as he felt he was unworthy to be crucified in the same manner that Christ died (upright). As such, some Catholics use this cross as a symbol of humility and unworthiness in comparison to Christ.
According to Roman Catholicism, the Pope is Peter’s successor as Bishop of Rome. Therefore the Papacy is often represented by symbols that are also used to represent Peter one example being the Keys of Heaven, another the Petrine Cross. During Pope John Paul II’s visit to Israel, he sat on a chair with the Cross of Peter cut into the back.[1]
The inverted cross is also one of the traditional symbols used by Petrine Orthodox Sebomenoi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_of_St._Peter
Surely you are not one of those ignorant people who repeat every falsehood they happen to see...
OUCH!!!!
Boggles the mind what Catholics will justify in their church’s actions, does it not?
I have noticed that there is virtually NOTHING which a catholic will not defend somehow as long as it is THEIR church which does it.
Rather telling, is it not?
Which brings us back to the point: My church doesn't use anything that smacks in any way of satanism despite Cronos' accusations. I would think you guys would do better. But I guess not.
Nah. I usually ignore the Vatican.
Me too and AMEN!
That quote is incomplete. It goes on to explain that the inverted cross is considered satanic by heavy metal aficionados and Satan worshippers. It is particularly offensive when it is a crucifix, as in some films, “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” or “The Exorcist.”
I do not consider the (inverted) Petrine Cross to be satanic, as do the heavy metal fans and satan worshippers. Which category do you fall into?
Actually, the Petrine Cross comes from a scrap of Origen’s writings. Didn’t you quote Origen, or was that someone else? If you did, do you only believe PARTS of what you quote, or all?
Never mind. I don’t want to know. People who are bigots are ultimately very dull, and I have more interesting things to do than sit and read lame remarks.
Others of them employ outward marks, branding their disciples inside the lobe of the right ear. From among these also arose Marcellina, who came to Rome under [the episcopate of] Anicetus, and, holding these doctrines, she led multitudes astray. They style themselves Gnostics. They also possess images, some of them painted, and others formed from different kinds of material; while they maintain that a likeness of Christ was made by Pilate at that time when Jesus lived among them. They crown these images, and set them up along with the images of the philosophers of the world that is to say, with the images of Pythagoras, and Plato, and Aristotle, and the rest. They have also other modes of honouring these images, after the same manner of the Gentiles. -Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1.25.6
But it is clear to every one that piety, which teaches to worship and honour, is the highest and oldest cause; and the law itself exhibits justice, and teaches wisdom, by abstinence from sensible images, and by inviting to the Maker and Father of the universe. -Clement ofAlexandria, The Stromata 2.18
So we would now make a remark about the arts of the theatre, about the things also whose authors in the names we execrate. We know that the names of the dead are nothing, as are their images; but we know well enough, too, who, when images are set up, under these names carry on their wicked work, and exult in the homage rendered to them, and pretend to be divine-none other than spirits accursed, than devils. -Tertullian, The Shows 10
Exodus 20:4 - You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth.
John 4:24 - God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.
Are you speaking of anti-protestant bigots or anti-catholic bigots, or both, or...nevermind. If a personal attack is your best rebuttal I'll accept that as a complement.
Oh, so you are a real authority, eh? Pardon me, it did not appear that you could be...
Now, I’ve always wondered, what do you do about those darn photos...? I mean, I have many photos of my deceased husband that I love to look at occasionally, and occasionally, I kiss the photo, and sometimes press them to my heart, along with his letters to me....And Exodus says make no image of what is in heaven or on earth, etc. AM I WORSHIPPING AN IDOL????? You appear to know it ALL, please tell me...WHERE DO I DRAW THE LINE???????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.