Posted on 02/05/2011 11:07:42 AM PST by Gamecock
In the book of Judges we read about another generation which arose, which knew neither the Lord nor what He had done (Judges 2:10). Today, it appears that a generation has arisen, which like Israel under the Judges, knows little of either the Lord nor of what He did during the time of the Protestant exodus and the struggles in the wilderness, which followed in the 16th and 17th century. Sometimes this is from a cowardly dislike of controversy and confrontation. But few people seem to understand either the evils from which the Reformation delivered us or the blessings which the Reformation won for us.
The Reformation delivered the Church from gross ignorance and spiritual darkness The church, before the Reformation, was a church without the Bible. And a church without a Bible is as useless as a lighthouse without light, a candlestick without a candle, or a motor vehicle without an engine. The priests and people knew scarcely anything about Gods Word or the way of salvation in Christ.
Bishop J.C. Ryle described the situation: The immense majority of the clergy did little more than say masses and offer up pretended sacrifices, repeat Latin prayers and chant Latin hymns (which of course most of the people could not understand), hear confessions, grant absolutions, give extreme unction, and take money to get dead people out of purgatory.
Bishop Latimer observed: When the devil gets influence in a church, up go candles and down goes preaching.
Quarterly sermons (that is, once every three months) were prescribed to the clergy, but not insisted upon. Latimer noted that while the mass was never left unsaid for a single Sunday, sermons might be omitted for 20 Sundays in succession. Indeed, to preach much was to incur the suspicion of being a heretic.
Bishop Hooper, who along with Bishop Latimer was burned alive at the stake under Queen Mary, did a survey in 1551 and found that out of 311 clergy in his Diocese, 168 were unable to repeat the Ten Commandments, 31 of those 168 could not even say in which part of the Scripture the Ten Commandments were to be found, 40 could not tell where the Lords Prayer was written, and 31 of the 40 did not even know who the author of the Lords Prayer was!
Bishop Ryle summarized the situation: Before the Reformation was a religion without knowledge, without faith and without lively hope a religion without justification, regeneration and sanctification a religion without any clear views of Christ and the Holy Ghost. Except in rare instances, it was little better than an organized system of Mary worship, saint worship, image worship, relic worship, pilgrimages, alms giving, formalism, ceremonialism, processions, penances, absolutions, masses and blind obedience to the priests. It was a huge higgledy-piggledy of ignorance and idolatry, and serving an unknown God by deputy. The only practical result was that the priests took the peoples money and undertook to secure their salvation. And the people flattered themselves that the more they gave to the priests, the more sure they were to go to Heaven!
The Reformation delivered the church from childish superstitions The Roman Catholic church, before the Reformation, taught its members to seek spiritual benefit from so-called relics of dead saints and to treat them with divine honor. Calvins Inventory of Relics and Hobart Seymours Pilgrimage to Rome catalog some of the ludicrous swindles which were perpetrated by the church of Rome. This included pieces of wood of the true cross enough to load a large ship, thorns professing to be part of the Saviours crown of thorns, enough to make a huge faggot, at least 14 nails said to have been used at the Crucifixion, four spearheads each purporting to be the one which pierced our Lords side, at least three seamless coats of Christ, for which the soldiers cast lots, Saint Jamess hand, bones of Mary Magdalene, toenails from Saint Edmund, some bread, purported to have been used by Christ at the Last Supper, a girdle of the Virgin Mary and milk from the Virgin Mary! The Royal Commissioners of Henry VIII examined a vial at the Abbey in Gloucestershire, which was said to contain the blood of Christ! The Commissioners found that it contained the blood of a duck.
There were literally thousands of profane and vile inventions, fabrications and deceptions, which Roman priests imposed on the people before the Reformation. They must have known that they were deceiving the people, yet they persisted in presenting these lies and requiring that the ignorant laity believe them. Sometimes the priests induced dying sinners to give vast tracts of lands to abbeys and monasteries, in order to atone for their bad lives. In one way or another, they were continually separating sinners from their money and accumulating property and wealth in the hands of the Roman church.
The power of the priests was practically despotic and was used for every purpose except the advancement of the Christian faith. It seemed that their primary object was power. To them confession had to be made. Without their absolution and extreme unction no professing Christian could be saved. Without their masses no soul could be redeemed from purgatory. In short, they were, to all intents and purposes, the mediators between Christ and man. To please and honor the Roman church was a devout Christians first duty. To injure them was the greatest of sins. One of the indulgences issued in 1498, with the authority of the Pope, claimed: To absolve people from usury, theft, manslaughter, fornication and all crime whatsoever, except smiting the clergy and conspiring against the Pope!
A starving man in a famine may be reduced to eating rats and rubbish, rather than die of hunger. Similarly, a conscience-stricken soul, deprived of Gods Word, should not be judged too harshly by us, if they struggled to find comfort in the most debasing superstition. However, we must never forget that it was from such superstitions which the Reformation delivered us.
The Reformation delivered the church from blatant immorality Before the Reformation, the lives of the clergy were simply scandalous. There were brothels in the Vatican. The Popes, Cardinals and Bishops openly consorted with prostitutes and engaged in the most debauched orgies. The local priests became notorious for gluttony, drunkenness and gambling. As Bishop Ryle pointed out: To expect the huge roots of ignorance and superstition, which filled our land, to bear any but corrupt fruit, would be unreasonable and absurd.
Contemporary art depicted friars as foxes preaching with the neck of a stolen goose peeping out of the hood behind; as wolves giving absolution, with the sheep partly concealed under their cloaks; or as apes sitting on a sick mans bed with a crucifix in one hand and with the other hand in the suffering persons pocket! Such public contempt in art reflects the scorn with which the clergy were held at the time.
Bishop Ryle pointed out: But the blackest spot on the character of our pre-Reformation clergy in England is one of which it is painful to speak their horrible contempt of the 7th Commandment the consequences of shutting up herds of men and women in the prime of life, in monasteries and nunneries, were such that I will not defile my paper by dwelling upon them if ever there was a plausible theory weighed in the balance and found utterly wanting, it is the favorite theory that celibacy and monasticism promote holiness monasteries and nunneries were frequently sinks of iniquity.
The report of the Royal Commissioners, under Henry VIII, declared: That manifest sin, vicious, carnal and abominable living, is daily used and committed in abbeys, priories, and other religious houses of monks, cannons and nuns, and that albeit many continual visitations have been had, by the space of 200 years or more, for an honest and charitable reformation of such unthrifty, carnal and abominable living, yet that nevertheless, little or none amendment was hitherto had, but that their vicious living shamefully increased and augmented.
It was observed that: There is no surer recipe for promoting immorality than fullness of bread and abundance of idleness. (Ezekiel 16:49) It is from such superstition, corruption, immorality, ignorance and idolatry that the Reformation freed the church.
The Reformation gave the church back the Bible In 1519, six men and a woman were burned at Coventry for teaching their children the Ten Commandments, the Lords Prayer and the Apostles Creed in English. Nothing seems to have alarmed and enraged the Roman priesthood as much as the spread of Bibles in the local language. It was for the crime of translating the Bible into English that the Reformer, William Tyndale, was burned at the stake. Of all the aspects which combined to make up the Reformation, no other aspect received such bitter opposition as the translation and circulation of the Scriptures. The translation of the Bible struck a blow at the root of the whole Roman Catholic system. The Bible, as the only rule of faith and conduct, freely available in the local languages, was a threat to all the superstitions and abuses of the medieval Roman popery. With the Bible in every parish church, every thoughtful man soon saw that the religion of the priests had no basis in Holy Scripture.
The Reformation opened the road to the throne of Grace The way of salvation had become blocked up and made impassible by heaps of superstitious rubble. He who desired to obtain forgiveness had to seek it through a jungle of priests, saints, Mary worship, masses, penances, confession, absolution and the like, so that there might as well have been no throne of Grace at all. J.C. Ryle
The Reformers hacked their way through this huge jungle of papal obstruction and cleared the way for every heavy-laden sinner to go straight to the Lord Jesus Christ for remission of sins.
The Reformation restored Biblical simplicity to worship Before the Reformation, the laity were only present at church services as passive, ignorant spectators. The elaborate, theatrical presentations of the sacraments were a solemn farce because the ceremonies and prayers were in Latin. The laity could bring their bodies to the services, but their minds, understanding, reason and spirit could take no part at all. For this reason, the 24th Article of the Church of England declared: It is a thing totally repugnant to the Word of God and the custom of the primitive church to have public prayer in the church or to minister the sacraments in a tongue not understood of the people.
The Reformation gave a Biblical understanding of the office of a minister Before the Reformation, the concept of the Christian ministry was sacerdotal. That is it was understood that every clergyman was a sacrificing priest. The clergy were understood to hold the keys of Heaven and to be practically the mediators between God and man.
The Reformers brought the office of the clergy down to its Scriptural level. They stripped it entirely of any sacerdotal character. They cast out the words sacrifice and altar. They taught that the clergy were pastors, ambassadors, messengers, witnesses, evangelists, teachers and ministers of the Word and sacraments. The Reformers taught that the chief business of every Christian minister is to preach the Word and to be diligent in prayer and the reading of the Scriptures. The Reformers taught the immense superiority of the pulpit to the confessional. For this reason, where the altar used to be, the Lords table was placed with an open Bible, or a pulpit, showing the centrality of Gods Word in the worship of Protestant churches.
The Reformation restored a Biblical understanding of holiness Before the Reformation, it was believed that a monastic life and vows of celibacy were the only ways to escape sin and to attain sanctification. Multitudes of men and women poured into the monasteries and convents under the vain idea that this would please God and ensure their eternal salvation.
The Reformers struck at the root of this fallacy by establishing the great Scriptural principle that true religion was not to be found in retiring into convents and monasteries and fleeing from the difficulties of daily life, but in manfully facing up to our difficulties and doing our duty diligently - in every position to which God calls us. It is not by running away from the world, that we fulfill Gods call, but by courageously resisting the devil, the flesh and the world and overcoming them in daily life. That is how true holiness is to be exhibited. For this reason, the Reformers dissolved the monasteries and convents in their areas and freed the inmates to be reintegrated into normal life.
The Reformers also ordered that the Ten Commandments be set up in every parish church and taught to every child, and that our duty towards God and our neighbor be set forth in the Catechism. They insisted that you cannot become saints by shirking your duties in society.
A Heritage of Faith and Freedom We must continually thank God for the Reformation. It lit the flames of knowledge and freedom which we must ensure are never allowed to be extinguished or to grow dim. We need to continually remember that the Reformation was won for us by the blood of many tens of thousands of martyrs. It was not only by their preaching and praying, and writing and legislation, but by their sacrifices that our religious liberty, freedom of conscience and Christian heritage was won.
The Reformation found church members steeped in ignorance and left them in possession of knowledge. It found them without Bibles and left them with the Bible in every parish. It found them in darkness and left them in light. It found them bound in fear and left them enjoying the liberty and peace which only Christ can give. It found them strangers to the blood of Christs atonement, to faith, grace and holiness and left them with the key of all those blessings in their hands. It found them blind and left them with spiritual eyes to see. It found them slaves to superstition and set them free to serve Christ.
As Bishop Ryle declared: Are we to return to a church which boasts that she is infallible and never changes to a church which has never repented her pre-Reformation superstitions and abominations to a church which has never confessed and abjured her countless corruptions? Are we to go back to gross ignorance of true religion? Shame on us, I say, if we entertain the idea for a moment! Let the Israelite return to Egypt, if he will. Let the prodigal go back to his husks among the swine. Let the dog return to his vomit. But let no Englishman with brains in his head, ever listen to the idea of exchanging Protestantism for Popery, or returning to the bondage of the church of Rome. No, indeed! God forbid! The man who counsels such base apostasy and suicidal folly, must be judicially blind. The iron collar has been broken; let us not put it on again. The prison has been thrown open; let us not resume the yoke and return to our chains Let us not go back to ignorance, superstition, priestcraft and immorality.
If you have a Bible in your own language, and enjoy to read and study Gods Word, never forget that you owe that Bible to the Reformation. Brave men and women died that you could have the freedom to delight in Gods Word.
If you know the joy of sins forgiven and new life in Christ, if you are walking by faith and enjoying peace with God, never forget that you owe this priceless privilege to the Reformation.
If you enjoy Church services, Scripture choruses, Hymns, prayers and sermons in your own language, remember that for this you are also indebted to the Reformation.
If you appreciate the Biblical and practical sermons of your pastor, and his counsel, never forget that for this you are indebted to the Reformation. The Reformation is the source of many blessings. We need to ask if we are on the side of the Reformers, or of those who burned them and the Bible.
Contend earnestly for the Faith which was once for all delivered to the saints. Jude 3
Be the first. Tell us what traditions it was to which Paul was referring that were passed down to the believers that he wanted them to hold to.
Tell us what they specifically are and how you know it. What are the sources you use to back up that knowledge?
The RM is the one who’s been telling people to cite quotes.
Take it up with him if you don’t like what I say.
It took a minute to figgar out how they did it. (chuckle)
What a great illustration of the authors point. During the Dark Ages Bible literacy was terrible, even the clergy were ignorant. So the public would never question transubstantiation and the need for grace refills.
And I'll raise you annulments-aka Catholic divorce, homosexual priests, and pedophile priests.
No Catholic is any position to point fingers at queer clergy.
Yep. Exactly.
They'll be asked a simple question, then refuse to answer it until you promise something totally off-topic, i.e. "I'll answer your question right after you tell us when you stopped beating your children."
ANYTHING not to be confronted by the clear words of Scripture.
ROTFLMAO!
“All these verses suggest that we are to follow the tradition of the apostles and the whole of Christianity is not found in scripture.”
Actually, only the Roman Catholic Church suggests this; it is, according to scripture, the teachings of Christ, through the apostles, that are to be obeyed. The made-up, false doctrines of purgatory, indulgences, Maryolatry, celibate priests, penance and a whole slew of others ARE NOT that tradition.
If it is, then please show where in scripture it is supported! Or, demonstrate, completely — COMPLETELY — the line of succession for each one of these “doctrines” straight back to Christ.
Otherwise, shouldn’t you stick with what is in the scripture?
Hoss
Well, it looks like there’s nothing new under the sun — even the same lame graphics.
:D
Hoss
Perhaps
when folks noses are stuck in pseudo-Mary’s White Hankies 24/7/365
it leaves absolutely no time to cultivate creativity.
The most they can do is flattering imitation with a wimpy perverse twist.
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
you correctly quote St Paul in Ephesians say there is only one baptism. then your next sentence starts by asking “which baptism......” By the words “which baptism”, you are indicating there are two or more baptisms, the Bible knows of only one baptism, as you quoted. The sacrament of baptism was commanded by Jesus in Matthew 28, Peter says it is for the remission of sins in Acts 2:38-39, Saul was commanded to wash away his sins by baptism in Acts 22:16, 1 Peter 3:20-21 says baptism does now save us, Paul explains how in Romans 6:3-4 tells us we are baptized into Christ, 1 Corinthians 12:12-13 tells us the Spirit baptizes us into One Body, Galatians 3:26-27 tells us we put on Christ in baptism and Titus 3:5 tells us we are regenerated by baptism. This was the consistent teaching of the Church for 1,500 years, before some departed from the Faith and taught a different Gospel.
The above dovetails into your second question about Baptists. They don’t believe in baptismal regeneration, they teach there are two baptisms, the first by the Holy Spirit, the second a meaningless ritual done just as a first act of obedience. The Bible doesn’t teach two baptisms and it was unheard of for 1,500 years. The Nicene Creed states “we acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins”, echoing Acts 2. The Church Fathers are unanimous the Apostles taught baptism is for the remission of sins.
You asked for a few false doctrines, so i will add no infant baptism and no belief in the Real Presence in the Eucharist.
The Bible correctly predicted in the latter days, some will depart from the Faith, and sadly, the Baptists have departed from the historical, orthodox Christian Faith.
I've hesitated to note that, however, because I figured that once I did, they'd avoid it and remove a number of our opportunities for laughs from the threads.
I don't know why their efforts at such flattering imitation are always sooooo KLUNKY!
Maybe it's related to the whole super klunky
AUTHORITARIAN STOMP meme
in the whole Vatican Alice In Wonderland School Of Theology, Reality Mangling, Chronic Professional Blaming, Wailing and Whining Institute system.
I mean . . . can't you just see this gal in a nun's habit stomping around her Parochial school whacking students with the ruler--harumphing and maybe indignantly yelling in the process?
You can believe what you want about my motive for responding to you, but you cannot KNOW my intent. Since my intent - which I DO know - was not to insult, I have a clear conscience before my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. And to reiterate, if the article contains lies as you claim then why not say what is incorrect about it and state your basis for saying so? It really is that simple. The only one being rude and insulting so far in this our exchange has been you. So maybe you need that miracle mirror.
Just getting back to other threads here after the Super Bowl game...
Yes, they do this often. I remember my first taste of the Religious threads and of course had no clue what I was getting myself into ..... It does take quite awhile to understand the territory here and why it is what it is. But i use to get so irritated when they just went round and round and round....but then you discover why that is.
Just a simple question: Why was Jesus Christ baptized?
And here we are approaching 700 posts on this thread and STILL not one Catholic has addressed the topic of the thread.
Nor has one pointed out any specifics as to what lies or slander they claim is in the article so that it can be addressed, or countered with material from other sources.
Perhaps they are afraid that if they get that close to the truth, some of it will rub off on their fingers.
read Matthew 3:14-15 for your answer. John’s baptism was not the same as our Christian Baptism, as Jesus did not die on the cross yet. Once Jesus died and rose again, He commanded a baptism that was for the remission of sins and receiving the Holy Spirit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.