Posted on 11/08/2010 3:37:09 PM PST by delacoert
Yeah, yeah, yeah. All, beware of this mindset. Because if what sitetest says is applicable in this thread discussion, then it's likewise applicable to liberal MSM media moguls & journalists.
In fact, here...why don't you ponder adding below to your FReeper homepage (words in italics are yours; other words are parallel ones I've added as a "test" to see how it sounds to extend your belief system to a parallel universe called the "MSM"):
...if one wishes to say that the liberal MSM has beliefs, ideologies and worldviews that are Keith Olberman, NY Times & CNN types of lies or even Satan's lies, that's perfectly reasonable, but that doesn't mean that MSM folks who believe them are lying or telling lies when they affirm their beliefs. Someone who affirms his worldviews, Marxist, Socialist, or otherwise has not lied or told lies by affirming his ideologies, whether he meets your standards of journalism...
ALL: Sitetest has just committed himself to the notion that if liberal journalists have studied & believed Marxism and is committed to that ideology...that even if these Marxist journalists say they believe the Bible -- and have studied the Bible to compare Marxist and Biblical worldviews to see where they contradict...then even if these journalists spread the lies of Marxism...these journalists themselves are not guilty of telling Marxist lies...it might be deemed whacky, goofy, unintentionally false, but doesn't constitute lies coming from their own mouths or keyboards or pens.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. All, beware of this mindset. Because if what sitetest says is applicable in this thread discussion, then it's likewise applicable to liberal MSM media moguls & journalists.
In fact, here...why don't you ponder adding below to your FReeper homepage (words in italics are yours; other words are parallel ones I've added as a "test" to see how it sounds to extend your belief system to a parallel universe called the "MSM"):
...if one wishes to say that the liberal MSM has beliefs, ideologies and worldviews that are Keith Olberman, NY Times & CNN types of lies or even Satan's lies, that's perfectly reasonable, but that doesn't mean that MSM folks who believe them are lying or telling lies when they affirm their beliefs. Someone who affirms his worldviews, Marxist, Socialist, or otherwise has not lied or told lies by affirming his ideologies, whether he meets your standards of journalism...
ALL: Sitetest has just committed himself to the notion that if liberal journalists have studied & believed Marxism and is committed to that ideology...that even if these Marxist journalists say they believe the Bible -- and have studied the Bible to compare Marxist and Biblical worldviews to see where they contradict...then even if these journalists spread the lies of Marxism...these journalists themselves are not guilty of telling Marxist lies...it might be deemed whacky, goofy, unintentionally false, but doesn't constitute lies coming from their own mouths or keyboards or pens.
Irrespective of Pauline scriptural praise of Berians and explicit scriptural description of Berian practices, are rejected by sitetest.
Irrespective of scriptural Pauline praise of Berian conduct and scriptural description of Berian practices, sitetest rejects reasonable conclusions about truthfulness and lies.
Irrespective of scriptural teaching about the deceitful intentions of the heart of all men, sitetest rejects reasonable conclusions about truthfulness and lies.
Irrespective of the nature of Augustinian teaching concerning about God resisting tendency of the mind of man, sitetest rejects reasonable conclusions about truthfulness and lies.
Irrespective of the scriptural testimony of the Book of Jeremiah about the deceitful nature of man's heart, sitetest rejects reasonable conclusions about truthfulness and lies.
sitetest seems to repeatedly reject scriptural and traditional conclusions about the heart of man and the tendency to lie.
And what IS a testimony?
I have writings by a prophet of your chosen religious organization that THEY (prophets) lead your church:
In conclusion let us summarize this grand key, these Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet, for our salvation depends on them.
1. The prophet is the only man who speaks for the Lord in everything.
2. The living prophet is more vital to us than the standard works.
3. The living prophet is more important to us than a dead prophet.
4. The prophet will never lead the church astray.
5. The prophet is not required to have any particular earthly training or credentials to speak on any subject or act on any matter at any time.
6. The prophet does not have to say Thus Saith the Lord, to give us scripture.
7. The prophet tells us what we need to know, not always what we want to know.
8. The prophet is not limited by mens reasoning.
9. The prophet can receive revelation on any matter, temporal or spiritual.
10. The prophet may advise on civic matters.
11. The two groups who have the greatest difficulty in following the prophet are the proud who are learned and the proud who are rich.
12. The prophet will not necessarily be popular with the world or the worldly.
13. The prophet and his counselors make up the First Presidencythe highest quorum in the Church.
14. The prophet and the presidencythe living prophet and the First Presidencyfollow them and be blessedreject them and suffer.
I testify that these fourteen fundamentals in following the living prophet are true. If we want to know how well we stand with the Lord then let us ask ourselves how well we stand with His mortal captainhow close do our lives harmonize with the Lords anointedthe living ProphetPresident of the Church, and with the Quorum of the First Presidency.
Ezra Taft Benson
(Address given Tuesday, February 26, 1980 at Brigham Young University)
If Joseph Smith would return to America today; I know which group HE would claim is authentic!
It's no lie: I offend MORMONs by telling the Truth!
Watch out, or you TOO will be playing with the TarBaby!
;^)
INDEED!
Them girls back home are waiting for the prime meat to return!
AMEN!
Titus 3:9
But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes about the Law, for they are unprofitable and worthless.
I wish the MORMONs we see in these threads would STAND on what their chosen religious organization HAS TAUGHT and not get that deer in the headlight look and say, "Huh?"
Then they channel Hinckley and say, "I don't know that we teach that."
Yeah; we know...
I consider myself to be People magazine's Sexiest Man of the Year for 2011, too.
Don't much clearer than this!
NOW the missionary is just a LITTLE bit pregnant.
You have misrepresented me again.
So we have a problem in not fully explaining one's position?
Whose fault is that?
If they BECAME lies after he looked BACK upon them; they must have BEEN lies when he told them; or else some kind of MAGIC is involved with the passing of time and reflecting upon the past.
There must be SOMETHING; for MORMONism claims Catholics as their biggest source of converts (AFAIK).
A testimony is knowledge transmitted by God to man.
What knowledge did GOD transmit to you?
The BIBLE (GOD's Word) transmitted to me that an occurance that JS claimed happened to him in the Sacred Grove would be classified as demonic.
Did GOD tell you something different?
Again, not going for an exhaustive list - if your name isn't included, please don't take offense. I also addressed this post to a couple of posters whom I believe to be members of the LDS, as the development of this thread may be of interest to LDS folks.
Anyway, it's been a grand old time. I've read many of your posts (time and interest preclude a careful study of every post) and I remain unpersuaded. In fact, as we've argued it out, I'm less persuaded that it is reasonable to say that an adherent of a religion who affirms the tenets of his religion is a liar telling lies.
I'm sure that you continue in your view, as well. Which is, as far as I can tell, objectvely false. Are you now all liars? LOL.
This may be my last post to this thread. I feel like we're all starting to repeat ourselves. I read through a few of the responses to me after my last post, started to post, and realized that I'd been over the same ground before. If you didn't get it the first (or second) time, it's unlikely that further beating of the horse will bring it back to life.
I have posted in good will. Sadly, I can't say that I believe most of my respondents have done likewise at all times. If you seek to persuade, you're not even close. If you seek to bludgeon so that you can congratulate each other for how badly you treated the outsider, well, I have often felt bludgeoned in this thread, so I suppose then, if that's your goal, you will have succeeded.
To this Catholic poster, you have often seemed uncharitable and unreasoning. And shrill. Some of you are very shrill. I can see why the LDS folks pretty much despise you.
To this point, I've generally referred to “non-Catholic/non-Orthodox Christians.” Before I depart this thread, just a note on my own definition of that mouthful of a phrase. It means those who are validly baptized into a sect apart from the apostolic churches with valid apostolic succession, holy orders and Eucharist. As well, I prefer my Christians Trinitarian, but if non-Trinitarians enter the discussion, well, for the sake of discussion, I'll be a little fuzzy around the edges.
As a Catholic, I don't believe that members of the LDS fall into this group, “non-Catholic/non-Orthodox Christians,” as the Catholic Church doesn't recognize LDS baptism, and considers the LDS religion non-Christian. It has to do with the fundamentally different ontology of our God and theirs.
That being said, I've worked in the world of business for nearly thirty years, and have dealt with, done business with, worked for, employed, and had partners with a wide variety of persons, of many different backgrounds.
In nearly three decades, I've worked with a modest number of Mormons. I've done business with them, had them as team partners, had them as employees. In that time:
- I have never caught a Mormon in a lie. Ever.
- No Mormon has ever cheated or stolen from me.
- No Mormon has ever not fulfilled a business commitment to me.
- I have never, ever had to carry a Mormon team member because he didn't get his share (and more) of the work done in a timely, effective, and excellent manner.
- I have never regretted doing business with a Mormon.
Now, I don't live in Utah, but rather in the suburbs of DC. So, this isn't a predominantly-Mormon place. Maybe because they are not terribly common here, they feel that they must be good examples. Perhaps where Mormons are thick, there is less pressure to feel that way and act accordingly.
Conversely, I've done business with lots of folks who go under various monikers of “Christian.” My experience with most groups of Christians, whether Catholic, Orthodox, or some flavor of non-Catholic/non-Orthodox is that there's good folks, there's bad folks, there's smart folks, there's dumb folks, diligent, conscientious folks, lazy, uncaring folks, folks whose word is gold, folks whose word is mud. There are Catholics that I've hated and Methodists that I've loved.
In my life, I've also worked with Muslims, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews and others. These, too, were pretty much a thorough mix of good and bad.
All a big pile of everything.
With one exception. Calvinists. On a handful of occasions, I have had significant business dealings with self-identified rigorous, robust Calvinists. TULIP and all that. Sadly, none of these folks has failed to either lie to, cheat or steal from me. I have paid dearly at the hands of Calvinists. Total business losses to the lies, cheating and stealing by Calvinists range in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Twice, Calvinists who cheated me or stole from me nearly drove me into personal financial ruin.
But other than that, folks are a pretty mixed bag.
I mention this comparison between Mormons and Christians and other non-Christians because it's relevant to this thread and the posts herein.
It is possible that at least some Mormons lie about religion. It's even possible that many or most Mormons do so lie.
But it cuts against my own personal experience of Mormons, and thus, your asserting it to be so doesn't persuade me in the least. If a practicing Mormon were to tell me that they lie about their religion, that would have credibility to me. But not a non-Mormon (especially if you're a Calvinist, LOL!) or even an ex-Mormon.
It may be that my own experiences are out of the ordinary, are outliers, are the exception, not the rule. But they're what I've got. And who am I going to believe, you or my lyin’ eyes? LOL.
Anyway, be well. No hard feelings on my part, all is forgiven on my part, forgive me my sins if you perceive me to have sinned against you.
I'll be kinda busy over the next few days, and as I said, I think we're all starting to repeat ourselves anyway, but I may look in at any replies to this post, and I may reply, especially if I think that we're saying something new, adding to the existing discussion.
For those of you who wish to reply with something to show my stupidity, cupidity, ignorance, or to otherwise reflect poorly on me, well, have at it and may God bless you! Remember, this is just the Internet, not your real life. Try not to take it too seriously, and I'll try the same thing, too.
God's blessing to all.
sitetest
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.