Replies

Wasn't aware - but then YOUR chose it for your rebuttal -speaking volumes about your judgement.

Um, I was posting sites that were actually comparing the Trinity and the Godhead, but I suppose that means nothing to you.

It was not a rebuttal, I didn't need a rebuttal.

Yep, I didn't do an in depth long winded, time consuming exam for you, never will, not gonna happen, I don't work for you. You seem to have unlimited time to write long, and I mean huge posts, I am a part timer, doesn't mean you win just means you must be retired with absolutely nothing positive you can do with your life. (I feel for you.)
In my opinion, the MRM is just like the banned sites. It promotes hate and misinformation. I could care less if it was racist too, all "anti" sites should be banned if anything is being banned. And yes I think sites that are anti Catholic, or Baptist, etc. should all be banned from FR. If your gonna ban one...

My strict opinion is probably one (among many) reasons I will never be tapped to be a mod.

as for my reasons for picking it, it was not because it was anti Catholic. I picked it because it was talking about the Trinity Vs. The Godhead. Nothing more.
Your insinuations that I am a racist are not appreciated, your insinuations that I an anti Catholic, are likewise not appreciated.

IMHO, you are making this post (and several more) about me, not the topic. Stop it.

Delph

Um, I was posting sites that were actually comparing the Trinity and the Godhead, but I suppose that means nothing to you.

Thats correct, since you said nothing about 'comparing', you said only Trinity.

In my opinion, the MRM is just like the banned sites. It promotes hate and misinformation.

Ah yes, the Nauvoo Expositor reflex. You opinion is worthless since you can't prove hate and misinformation for all your bluster

as for my reasons for picking it, it was not because it was anti Catholic.

Given you own words that you didn't investigate it and that was your only criteria - go figure.

Your insinuations that I am a racist are not appreciated, your insinuations that I an anti Catholic, are likewise not appreciated.

No doubt, but then you should examine you selection criteria more closely if you want to maintain your reputation.

IMHO, you are making this post (and several more) about me, not the topic. Stop it.

LOL, your actions, not mine. :)

I could care less if it was racist too, all "anti" sites should be banned if anything is being banned.

"Anti" sources and Freepers are welcome on "open" Religion Forum threads. Vigorous pro and con is to be expected in a town square debate.

Posters who are deeply offended by "anti" opinions should IGNORE "open" Religion Forum threads altogether. Don't read them, don't post to them. Instead, read and post to "ecumenical" "caucus" "devotional" or "prayer" threads in the Religion Forum.

Both of you: enough has been said on the subject of the banned source. It's time to return to discussing the issues.

...all "anti" sites should be banned if anything is being banned. And yes I think sites that are anti Catholic, or Baptist, etc. should all be banned from FR. If your gonna ban one...

What about anti-Presbyterian? Such as LDS.org and anything promoting Joseph Smith's fabled "First Vision"?

Um, I was posting sites that were actually comparing the Trinity and the Godhead, but I suppose that means nothing to you.

OH!

It means a LOT to me; for it SHOWS how MORMONism is a heresy compared to Christianity!

IMHO, you are making this post (and several more) about me, not the topic.

They are innertwined; are they not?

I could care less if it was racist too, all "anti" sites should be banned if anything is being banned.

There is a really BIG one in the Heart of SLC!

The LDS Organization® prints Hundreds of Thousands of THIS yearly!

http://scriptures.lds.org/en/js_h/1/17#17

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other—This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!
18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)—and which I should join.
19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.”
20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, “Never mind, all is well—I am well enough off.” I then said to my mother,
“I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true.”

The LDS headquarters, visited by THOUSANDS daily, has this placed in prominent view:

...which reiterates the charge that "they were all wrong; they teach for doctrines the commandments of men".