Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
The ultimate intention of Catholicism is the restoration of the Holy Roman Empire. That has always been the ambition, at least covertly, but now it is being promoted overtly and openly.
The purpose of this article is only to make that intention clear. It is not a criticism of Catholics or Catholicism (unless you happen to think a Catholic dictatorship is not a good thing).
The most important point is to understand that when a Catholic talks about liberty or freedom, it is not individual liberty that is meant, not the freedom to live one's life as a responsible individual with the freedom to believe as one chooses, not the freedom to pursue happiness, not the freedom to produce and keep what one has produced as their property. What Catholicism means by freedom, is freedom to be a Catholic, in obedience to the dictates of Rome.
The Intentions Made Plain
The following is from the book Revolution and Counter-Revolution:
|
"B. Catholic Culture and Civilization
"Therefore, the ideal of the Counter-Revolution is to restore and promote Catholic culture and civilization. This theme would not be sufficiently enunciated if it did not contain a definition of what we understand by Catholic culture and Catholic civilization. We realize that the terms civilization and culture are used in many different senses. Obviously, it is not our intention here to take a position on a question of terminology. We limit ourselves to using these words as relatively precise labels to indicate certain realities. We are more concerned with providing a sound idea of these realities than with debating terminology.
"A soul in the state of grace possesses all virtues to a greater or lesser degree. Illuminated by faith, it has the elements to form the only true vision of the universe.
"The fundamental element of Catholic culture is the vision of the universe elaborated according to the doctrine of the Church. This culture includes not only the learning, that is, the possession of the information needed for such an elaboration, but also the analysis and coordination of this information according to Catholic doctrine. This culture is not restricted to the theological, philosophical, or scientific field, but encompasses the breadth of human knowledge; it is reflected in the arts and implies the affirmation of values that permeate all aspects of life.
"Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church.
|
Got that? "Catholic civilization is the structuring of all human relations, of all human institutions, and of the State itself according to the doctrine of the Church." The other name for this is called "totalitarianism," the complete rule of every aspect of life.
This book and WEB sites like that where it is found are spreading like wildfire. These people do not believe the hope of America is the restoration of the liberties the founders sought to guarantee, these people believe the only hope for America is Fatima. Really!
In Their Own Words
The following is from the site, "RealCatholicTV." It is a plain call for a "benevolent dictatorship, a Catholic monarch;" their own words. They even suggest that when the "Lord's Payer," is recited, it is just such a Catholic dictatorship that is being prayed for.
[View video in original here or on Youtube. Will not show in FR.]
Two Comments
First, in this country, freedom of speech means that anyone may express any view no matter how much anyone else disagrees with that view, or is offended by it. I totally defend that meaning of freedom of speech.
This is what Catholics believe, and quite frankly, I do not see how any consistent Catholic could disagree with it, though I suspect some may. I have no objection to their promoting those views, because it is what they believe. Quite frankly I am delighted they are expressing them openly. For one thing, it makes it much easier to understand Catholic dialog, and what they mean by the words they use.
Secondly, I think if their views were actually implemented, it would mean the end true freedom, of course, but I do not believe there is any such danger.
When you want to know it will be shown to you. IMHO the gift of intelligence can be a burden and an obstacle. It seems intelligent to insist that everything be argued from Scripture. But some things cannot be argued from Scripture.
When you speak of priesthood, you speak of OT priesthood. Some reach to pagan referents to characterize the priesthood we profess.
But what if there is an entirely new sort of priesthood? It cannot be utterly unlike OT priesthood or that of the pagans, for if it were no one would use the same word for all three. But it could still be far more unlike those other two than one might be ready to imagine.
To me, as someone who pawed and clawed his way over the Bible looking for what it means to be in Love with Jesus, the language about being "in Christ", which Lewis points out now and then became a great hermeneutical key.
Also Paul's assertion that I had died! I had died and I must die!
My life is hid with Christ. The Spirit prays within me, especially when I do not know how to pray as I ought. Now I live "yet not I, but Christ lives in me."
From my point of view, this is not a matter of some ecstatic experience, not merely a matter of a more sharply honed intellect (though it may involve both of those things, and more.) It is rather the ontological fact of the new Life in Jesus, the Life of the Church. My moribund self is revivified with Christ's Spirit, so that I MUST be, somehow, "another Christ," because now it is His Spirit which makes me "a living soul." The Church too is a body, in some sense. But in that sense, whatever it might be, it is also vivified by the Spirit of Christ. And so it is Christ's body.
Now I have gone far enough in a teaching which ought to be reserved for those who seek it to learn rather than to combat it. When I taught on the Trinity two weeks ago, the first 40 minutes was about how to think about the doctrine, why it was the way it was, how it provides a key to Scripture, from the first verses of Genesis to the fathers and sons of Malachi, how it opens up the New Testament. And after the break I spoke about how we are caught up into the Trinity "in Jesus."
In my 'walk', in my offering of myself to Jesus as his 'minister', his lesser one -- which is at the root of the word, in my seeking to live as one loved, to do what one who need do nothing to be saved would do, this theme of Paul and of the Fathers became more and more important.
A wonder is proclaimed to us in the death and rising of the Lord. Shall we invite Him into our hearts as Lord and Savior and then ... go back to arguing on Free Republic, for crying out loud?
Chris our passover is sacrificed for us, therefore let us keep the feast;
Not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death has no more dominion over Him;
For in that he died, he died to sin once;
but in that he lives, he lives to God.
So also consider yourselves dead to sin, and alive to God, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Is that Biblical enough for you? Does this mean, CAN this mean nothing more than God selected our name in the 'damned' column, hit ctrl-X, moused to the 'alive' column, and hit ctrl-V?
This is new LIFE here. Life for each, life for the body -- life made alive by the Spirit of Christ.
That is the reality, the new reality, and it changes everything.
And, to bring it all back home, it changes even the basic idea of priesthood, or part of it. Hint: it is not OUR life; it is not OUR priesthood.
Yes it was, praise God. "If I were hungry I would not tell you!"
What we Catholics think we have now we do not think to be the priesthood of mere men.
They were written by that time. That's all. Canonization did not take place until the end of the 4th century because many apologists and churches used additional books.
There is no doubt that most churches used pretty much the New Testament as we know it today, but only in addition to many other brooks now no longer considered acceptable. And this is the crux of the matter.
The Holy Spirit led the first generation of Christians following the end of the Apostolic Era to compile the Canon.
This is such clero-romnticism! Then who told them 200 years later to get rid of the books they were using all along supposedly under the Holy Spirit's guidance, such as the Shepherd of Hermas, the Didache, the Book of Enoch, the Epistle of Barnabas, the various Apocalypses, and various Gospels, etc.?
Does he say if they inhale?
How can that be when the OT says the Torah is to be observed forever because the Law is eternal?
Hmmmmmm
Implying that Holy Spirit is involved with illegal drugs is
NOT an admirable activity.
Nor is it particularly spiritually safe activity.
Implying, believing, etc. that Holy Spirit has nothing to do with Pentecostalism/Charismania
is at least as bad, if not worse.
God have mercy.
Thankfully, God keeps score, accounts, records better than the rest of the multi-verse combined.
All will become thoroughly revealed IN HIS TIME.
Actually, I’m a bit shocked at the screen name appearing under that post.
Who could object to glossolalia and enthusiastic and apparently spontaneous praise of God and of His Son? Who could object to praying for miracles and healings? Not the popes!
When I'm elected pope, my motto will be, "Don't make me come up there." If somebody presents something for MY approval, I will take him at his word, look through the proposal, and will tend to approve it. I will do this KNOWING that if, later on, it turns out that they're all worshipping Gaia or whatever, I will have to rouse myself and kick some butt.
But it seems that in general, the Holy See tends to say, "Sure, whatever," with maybe some cautions about heresy and its consequences.
In other words, to approve of the Catholic charismatic movement is NOT AT ALL to approve of everything every group of charismatics may do. It is assumed they will remain orthodox and keep their promises.
> “What about peyote?”
.
I think only Catholic priests are allowed to use that, and only for their seances.
“Did you know her before she passed?”
.
Yes, loved her Missouri fried chicken!
BTW, probably 85-99% of the believable Heavenly visitations & visions have commented on the grass and flowers . . . how the grass and flowers spring right back after being walked on; how the colors are richer, more indescribably brilliant and alive; etc. etc.
Which . . . actually . . . in addition to being plenty Biblical is also rather plainly logical.
Though Proddys can understand how the
!!!!TRADITION!!!! bound and those
addicted to
—rubber histories,
—rubber logic,
—rubber daffynitionaries,
—rubber ‘Bibles.’
might find straight forward linear logic a bit of a challenge.
INDEED.
Though facts about Pentecostals and Charismatics seem to be of little to absolutely no interest for many of the RC’s . . . I’d have said to all but 2-3 of them. Guess I’ll have to revise it to 1 or 2 of them.
> “ that leaves us with 12.5 prayers per hour (minimum), or, a prayer every five minutes. For your entire waking existence.”
.
Some days that about pins it down; some others more like 10-15 minutes.
.
Condolences.
Goodness.
Whilst we are on the subject of your thoughts, pray give us your views on fluoridation of drinking water and the role of revenooers in an ideal federal government.
Projection again, huh!
.
Focusing on what another person does is often considered paranoid behavior by those of us who carry prescription pads.
Is this an admission that you are indeed a graduate of the Dr. Eckleburg School of Exaggerated Counting? Perhaps with an advanced degree?
I have already indicated a particular interest in Father John Corapi. His preaching of the Gospel of Christ surpasses most of the folks that I have witnessed.
Do you play the Banjo, or the Guitar?
Obama just hired 97,000 new ‘revenoors’ to enforce his Obamacare regs.
Speak for yourself!
God’s word says “pray without ceasing,” so I have quite a way to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.