Replies

nl:

When one will stoop to citing the likes of the “Rev.” Ian Paisley and Jonathan Smedley to support their argument all hope of objectivity, truth and fairness have been cast aside in an effort to falsely arrive at a point. Their works do not support your argument, they actually undermine your credibility in that your only objective standard for truth is anything that satisfied your prejudice. It does, however explain your hours away from the thread. You were obviously frantically searching the web to harvest nuggets supportive of your position instead of participating in legitimate scholarly research. Its a good thing you never attempted to earn your living in academia or science. If you did you would be posting from the public library on a county owned computer.

Yes, our doc does seem to like Angelfire blogs to provide her "proof" and then dressing them up as impartial websites.

And, she hasn't responded to either of my questions:
1. She said she doesn't like the kneeling, the icons, the Crucifix, the incense and the Eucharist (True Presence of Christ) that is there in Catholic and Orthodox churchs and would go to any non-Church group. Yet, when confronted with the fact that both Lutherans and Traditional Anglicans DO have these, she does not respond. Evidently she can't

2. I asked her specifically if she supported Kenneth Copeland's teachings (the guy who says that we are "mini gods") and she is strangely mum --> I guess it's because Kenneth is non-Catholic, so perhaps any teaching is fine for the Doc as long as it is non-Catholic?