To: Cronos
I’ve fully answered everyone one of your questions. Perhaps your ignorance of those answers is because you don’t like those answers.
2,988 posted on
07/28/2010 9:50:00 AM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
INDEED.
RC allergic responses to THE TRUTH can sure produce some convoluted piles of junk.
3,016 posted on
07/28/2010 12:05:41 PM PDT by
Quix
(THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
To: Dr. Eckleburg; Natural Law
Ive fully answered everyone one of your questions
Ah, so your answers are like below, I presume:
1. She said she doesn't like the kneeling, the icons, the Crucifix, the incense and the Eucharist (True Presence of Christ) that is there in Catholic and Orthodox churchs and would go to any non-Church group. Yet, when confronted with the fact that both Lutherans and Traditional Anglicans DO have these, she does not respond. Evidently she can't
So, you DO not consider Lutheran and Traditional Anglican churches to be worthy for you to worship, in, correct? Since they have the kneeling, the icons, the Crucifix, the incense and the Eucharist (True Presence of Christ) right?
2. 2. I asked her specifically if she supported Kenneth Copeland's teachings (the guy who says that we are "mini gods") and she is strangely mum --> I guess it's because Kenneth is non-Catholic, so perhaps any teaching is fine for the Doc as long as it is non-Catholic?
So, then you WOULD agree to Kenneth Copeland's teachings and would attend his sessions since they are non-Catholic. right?
3,044 posted on
07/28/2010 1:08:59 PM PDT by
Cronos
(Omnia mutantur, nihil interit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson