You read but I'm not sure you comprehend.
I'll bet. What makes you think that the frail human vessel of Paul was able to write better and more relevant verse than the words that came out of the mouth of Our Lord?
Mark, I did not mean that in a rude way. Truly. I don’t think you comprehend what Paul’s calling was. We’ve gone through this before. And after that. You do not seem interested in studying the revelations that were given him directly from Jesus Christ. You don’t seem interested in the “mystery” he was speaking of. It doesn’t seem of particular importance to you. That is your choice. I respect your decisions, I don’t agree with them, but I do respect them. Believe it or not, I do not want an argument. You take a stand. I take a stand. That’s the freedom we both enjoy. Maranatha!
Now, see, I did not know that they had recording devices back in Jesus' day. ;o)
Do you not understand that even the writers of the "gospels" wrote what the Holy Spirit revealed to them and brought back to their remembrance just as Jesus said he would? And Luke wasn't even an apostle nor palled around in Jesus' company. He met with people who had been and compiled the book from THEIR memories of Jesus' words. Yet we can say that Luke was just as inspired in his writings as were John, Matthew and Mark AND Peter, Paul, James, Jude and whoever wrote Hebrews (personally, I believe it was Paul). It was ALL scripture, and we accept them for what they were intended to be. A gift from God and an authoritative guide for all generations to what is truth just as he planned it to be.