Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr

Mark, I did not mean that in a rude way. Truly. I don’t think you comprehend what Paul’s calling was. We’ve gone through this before. And after that. You do not seem interested in studying the revelations that were given him directly from Jesus Christ. You don’t seem interested in the “mystery” he was speaking of. It doesn’t seem of particular importance to you. That is your choice. I respect your decisions, I don’t agree with them, but I do respect them. Believe it or not, I do not want an argument. You take a stand. I take a stand. That’s the freedom we both enjoy. Maranatha!


1,735 posted on 06/24/2010 7:45:33 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness ( DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE: The PRIDE of a PAWN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1729 | View Replies ]


To: small voice in the wilderness

Yes, we have been through this a couple of times. Yet, as I have pointed out, the revelations are doled out piecemeal and only in the context of the conversation or argument that Paul has at the time. There is no story of the revelation to Paul as it was to John. Except for Acts 9 - three verses - does Paul ever claim quotes from God? I do not downplay Paul’s role, but I will not accept Paul being elevated over Christ and the primary source of belief for Christianity.


1,750 posted on 06/24/2010 7:58:29 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1735 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson