[svcw]

I have decided to repost to you the article we have been talking about. Notice that the word “apology” appears in the headline and first sentence.
Trying to be objective do you really consider this to be an apology?
I am hoping this helps you out.
There is also a second link about the same issue.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695209359,00.html
http://www.sunstonemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/147-74-79.pdf

[donozark]

Talk about beating a dead horse! It doesn’t matter what EYE think!
And it isn’t I in need of help...

[Elsie]

Jason Olson, Deseret News

A horse-drawn wagon leads descendants carrying banners with the Mountain Meadows Massacre victim's famly names to an event marking the 150th anniversary of the Mountain Meadows Massacre at the memorial site near Enterprise.

---

---

At the EVENT, the names were used in a SACRED MORMON ceremony known as 'Baptism for the Dead'.

[Elsie]

The statement does not include the word “apology” nor ask for forgiveness. While Richard E. Turley, managing director of Family and Church History, told the Salt Lake Tribune that the statement was meant to be an apology, an Associated Press story claimed that “church leaders were adamant that the statement should not be construed as an apology.”

“We don’t use the word ‘apology,’” Church spokesman Mark Tuttle told AP reporter Paul Foy. “We used ‘profound regret.’”

---

Dang!

NOW what to believe??