Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does the Mormon Church Teach About Catholicism?
The Evangelization Station ^

Posted on 05/01/2010 8:33:45 AM PDT by GonzoII

What Does the Mormon Church Teach About Catholicism?

1. Starting with the First Vision, Mormonism teaches that all churches except the Mormon Church are an abomination in the sight of God. "My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)—and which I should join" (Joseph Smith History, 1:18-20)

"I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: “they draw• near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.” He again forbade me to join with any of them;..."

2. The Doctine and Covenants also has Jesus Christ condemning ALL other churches, and especially the "great and abominable church". "And the great and abominable church, which is the whore of all the earth, shall be cast down by devouring fire, according as it is spoken by the mouth of Ezekiel the prophet, who spoke of these things, which have not come to pass but surely must, as I live, for abominations shall not reign" (D&C 29:21).

3. The Church has a history of identifying the Catholic Church as the great and abominable church.

"The present Christian world exists and continues by division. The MYSTERY of Babylon the great, is mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, and it needs no prophetic vision, to unravel such mysteries. The old church is the mother, and the protestants are the lewd daughters. Alas! alas! what doctrine, what principle, or what scheme, in all, what prayers, what devotion, or what faith, `since the fathers have fallen asleep,' has opened the heavens; has brought men into the presence of God; and to the spirits of just men made perfect, and to an innumerable company of angels? The answer is, not any: `There is none in all christendom that doeth good; no, not one' (Apostle John Taylor, Times and Seasons, Vol.6, No.1, p.811).

"Babylon, literally understood, is the gay world; spiritual wickedness, the golden city, and the glory of the world, The priests of Egypt, who received a portion gratis from Pharaoh; the priests of Baal, and the Pharisees, and Sadducees, with their "long robes," among the Jews, are equally included in their mother's family, with the Roman Catholics, Protestants, and all that have not had the keys of the kingdom and power thereof, according to the ordinances of God." - Prophet John Taylor, Times and Seasons, Vol.6, No.1, p.939

"Both Catholics and Protestants are nothing less than the "whore of Babylon" whom the Lord denounces... as having corrupted all the earth by their fornications and wickedness. And any person who shall be so wicked as to receive a holy ordinance of the gospel from the ministers of any of these apostate churches will be sent down to hell with them, unless they repent of the unholy and impious act. If any penitent believer desires to obtain forgiveness of sins through baptism, let him beware of having any thing to do with the churches of apostate Christendom, lest he perish in the awful plagues and judgments, denounced against them. The only persons among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people who have authority from Jesus Christ to administer any gospel ordinance are those called and authorized among the Latter-day Saints. Before the restoration of the church of Christ to the earth in the year 1830, there have been no people on the earth for many generations possessing authority from God to minister gospel ordinances. We again repeat. Beware of the hypocritical false teachers and imposters of Babylon! (Apostle Orson Pratt, The Seer, Vol.2, No.4, p.255)

"A great portion of the oriental country has been preserved from the grossest idolatry, wickedness, confusion, bloodshed, murders, cruelty, and errors in religion that have overspread the rest of the world, under the name of Christianity, or mystery of iniquity. An open defiance of God is no mystery; open drunkenness, and revelling debauchery, and all manner of wickedness and immorality professed by sinners who profess to be nothing else, are no mystery; they do not deceive anybody; but when all manner of wickedness, idolatry, drunkenness, and corruption is cloaked under a sacred name, under an outward sanctity and holiness, and under as high and dignified an appellation as Christian, it is a mystery of iniquity; and that has overspread a great portion of the world, and has borne rule until the present day, sometimes under the name of Roman universality, sometimes under the name of the Greek Church, and at other times under various classes and names."

"Many that were honest have been deceived by this mystery of iniquity, who have esteemed things to be sacred, which were abominably corrupt; and corrupt superstitions have been revered because of the great names and sanctified professions that were attached to them. If such institutions actually professed wickedness, they would go for what they were worth; but when a thing professes to be holy, and takes the name of Christ as its founder, and the holy Prophets and Apostles, to carry out all manner of oppression, all manner of idolatry and idol worship, all manner of priestcraft and kingcraft, and more or less instigating division among nations and governments, all to carry out bloodshed, cruelty, the rack, the inquisition, and holding of men in bondage, ruling them with a red of iron, it is a mystery of iniquity calculated to deceive millions."

"But returning to the general corruption that has prevailed nationally, politically, and religiously, under the name of Christianity, leaving out Christ and his Apostles, I do think there has been no idolatry in the world, under any form or system, that could surpass it. It is the mystery of iniquity, the great whore of all the earth. It has brought the whole earth under a lasting curse, having departed from the laws of God, changed the ordinances, and broken the everlasting covenant, in consequence of which the earth is destined to be burned, and few men left" (Apostle Parley P. Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p.41)

"How long has this order of things existed, this dreadful apostacy, this class of people that pronounced themselves Zion, or Christians, without any of the characteristics of Zion? It has existed for some sixteen or seventeen centuries. It has spread itself and grown and gone into the four quarters of the earth. It is the great ecclesiastical power that is spoken of by the revelator John, and called by him the most corrupt and most wicked of all the powers of the earth, under the name of spiritual Babylon, or in other words Babel, which signifies confusion. This great and corrupt power is also represented by John as presenting a golden cup to the nations, full of all manner of filthiness and abominations."

"She is termed, in other places, by the same prophet, "The whore of all the earth," making the nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication. Some three centuries ago there came out sortie excellent men, named Martin Lather, John Calvin and many others that might be mentioned, who protested against the wickedness and abominations of the Church wherein they had been educated, and of which they had been members. Because of their protestations against the mother Church they were called Protestants. They pronounced her the whore of all the earth; they declared that she had no authority, that she had none of the blessings and gifts which characterized the ancient Christians. They came out and established other Churches... But among all these Churches where are the characteristics of Zion? We hunt for them in vain" (Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 14, p.346).

"Thrones shall be cast down, and the Ancient of Days shall sit, and the body of the fourth beast (or Babylon) shall be given to the devouring flame, and then shall the remnant of the heathen know that the Lord is God, for they shall see and hear of his judgments, which he shall execute upon the corrupt powers of the earth under the name of modern Christianity, scripturally called "Babylon the Great"—"The whore of all the earth," with whom the nations for centuries have committed fornication, and have drank out of her filthy cup. O Babylon! thou hast decked thyself with costly ornaments! Thou has clothed thyself with the most gaudy apparel! Thy seminaries of learning, and thy theological institutions have been multiplied far and wide. Thy priests are polished with all the refinements of a profound and extensive education. Thy costly and magnificent churches have been erected in great numbers throughout all thy borders. The merchants of the earth have made themselves rich through the abundance of thy luxuries. The learned—the great—the mighty—the kings of the earth, have glorified themselves in thy grand and superb palaces. Thou hast indeed enrobed thyself in the royal splendors of a queen. Thine external appearance has excited the admiration of all nations. But internally thou art rotten with the filth of thy whoredoms" (Apostle Orson Pratt, The Essential Orson Pratt, p.109).

"The Roman Catholic, Greek, and Protestant church is the great corrupt ecclesiastic power, represented by great Babylon which has made all nations drunk with her wickedness, and she must fall, after she has been warned with the sound of the everlasting gospel. Her overthrow will be by a series of the most terrible judgments which will quickly succeed each other, and sweep over the nations where she has her dominion, and at last she will be utterly burned by fire, for thus hath the Lord spoken. Great, and fearful, and most terrible judgments are decreed upon these corrupt powers, the nations of modern Christendom; for strong is the Lord God who shall execute His fierce wrath upon them, and He will not cease until He has made a full end, and until their names be blotted out from under heaven" ((Apostle Orson Pratt, Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon, p.84 - p.85).

The Evangelization Station P.O. Box 267 Angels Camp, California, 95222, USA Telephone: 209-728-5598 E-mail: evangelization@earthlink.net www.evangelizationstation.com Pamphlet 360


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History
KEYWORDS: beck; glennbeck; inman; lds; mormon; mormonism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-317 next last
To: svcw

My apologies; I meant to ping you as well.


221 posted on 05/02/2010 3:10:07 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Fail Sgt Bear fails again...
222 posted on 05/02/2010 3:18:55 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; Elsie
The rules of this forum prohibit me from naming names, but to those who frequent these threads they are familiar. Is not a tree known by its fruits?

Elsie - its called a C O P O U T

223 posted on 05/02/2010 3:51:23 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla; Natural Law; Elsie

I am still trying to figure out how the terms Protestant and Evangelical refer to individual posters. Really, if you believe someone fits these terms, whatever they mean, aren’t you allowed to say it? Of course as long as you explain what it is that you mean by the term.


224 posted on 05/02/2010 4:04:24 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Self interpreting of scripture is an old error:

ST. VINCENT OF LERINS [ A. D. 434 ]

With great zeal and closest attention, therefore, I frequently inquired of many men, eminent for their holiness and doctrine, how I might, in a concise and, so to speak, general and ordinary way, distinguish the truth of the Catholic faith from the falsehood of heretical depravity. I received almost always the same answer from all of them, that if I or anyone else wanted to expose the frauds and escape the snares of the heretics who rise up, and to remain intact and sound in a sound faith, it would be necessary, with the help of the Lord, to fortify that faith in a twofold manner: first, of course, by the authority of the divine law; and then, by the Tradition of the Catholic Church.

[Here, perhaps, someone may ask: “If the canon of the Scriptures be perfect, and in itself more than suffices for everything, why is it necessary that the authority of ecclesiastical interpretation be joined to it?” Because, quite plainly, Sacred Scripture, by reason of its own depth, is not accepted by everyone as having one and the same meaning. The same passage is interpreted in one way by some, in another by others, so that it can almost appear as if there are as many opinions as there are men. Novatian explains a passage in one way, Sabellius in another, Donatus in another; Anus, Eunomius, Macedonius in another; Photinus, Apollinaris, Priscillian in another; Jovinian, Pelagius, Caelestius in another; and afterwards in still another, Nestorius. And thus, because of so many distortions of such various errors, it is highly necessary that the line of prophetic and apostolic interpretation be directed in accord with the norm of the ecclesiastical and Catholic meaning.

In the Catholic Church herself every care must be taken that we may hold fast to that which has been believed everywhere, always, and by all. For this is then truly and properly Catholic. That is what the force and meaning of the name itself declares, a name that embraces all almost universally. This general rule will be correctly applied if we pursue universality, antiquity, and agreement. And we follow universality in this way, if we confess this one faith to be true, which is confessed by the whole Church throughout the whole world; antiquity, however, if we in no way depart from those interpretations which, it is clear our holy predecessors and fathers solemnized; and likewise agreement, if, in this very antiquity, we adopt the definitions and theses of all or certainly of almost all priests and teachers.

To announce, therefore, to Catholic Christians something other than that which they have received has never been permitted, is nowhere permitted, and never will be permitted. And to anathematize those who announce anything other than that which has been received once and for all has never been unnecessary, is nowhere unnecessary and never will be unnecessary.

He is a true and genuine Catholic who loves the truth of God, the Church, and the Body of Christ; who puts nothing else before divine religion and the Catholic Faith, neither the authority nor the love nor the genius nor the eloquence nor the philosophy of any man whatsoever, but, despising all that and being fixed, stable, and persevering in his faith, is determined in himself to hold and believe that only which he knows the Catholic Church has held universally and from ancient times.

"Guard" he says, "what has been committed." What does it mean, "what has been committed”? It is what has been faithfully entrusted to you, not what has been discovered by you; what you have received, not what you have thought up; a matter not of ingenuity, but of doctrine; not of private acquisition, but of public Tradition; a matter brought to you, not put forth by you, in which you must be not the author but the guardian, not the founder but the sharer, not the leader, but the follower. "Guard," he says, "what has been committed."Keep the talent of the Catholic Faith inviolate and unimpaired. What has been faithfully entrusted, let it remain in your possession, let it be handed on by you. You have received gold, so give gold. For my part I do not want you to substitute one thing for mother; I do not want you impudently to put lead in place of gold, or, fraudulently brass. I do not want the appearance of gold, but the real thing. O Timothy, O priest. O interpreter, O teacher, if a divine gift has made you suitable in genius, in experience, in doctrine to be the Beseleel of the spiritual tabernacle, cut out the precious gems of divine dogma, shape them faithfully, ornament them wisely, add splendor, grace and beauty to them! By your expounding it, may that now be understood more clearly which formerly was believed even in its obscurity. May posterity, by means of you, rejoice in understanding what in times past was venerated without understanding, Nevertheless, teach the same that you have learned, so that if you say something anew, it is not something new that you say.

But perhaps someone is saying: "Will there, then, be no progress of religion in the Church of Christ?" Certainly there is, and the greatest. For who is there so envious toward men and so exceedingly hateful toward God, that he would try to prohibit progress? But it is truly progress and not a change of faith. What is meant by progress is that something is brought to an advancement within itself, by change, something is transformed from one thing into another. It is necessary, therefore, that understanding, knowledge, and wisdom grow and advance strongly and mightily as much in individuals as in the group, as much in one man as in the whole Church, and this gradually according to age and the times; and this must take place precisely within its own kind, that is, in the same teaching, in the same meaning, and in the same opinion. The progress of religion in souls is like the growth of bodies, which, in the course of years, evolve and develop, but still remain what they were. . . . For example: Our fathers of old sowed the seeds of the wheat of faith in this field which is the Church. Certainly it would be unjust and incongruous if we, their descendents, were to gather, instead of the genuine truth of wheat, the noxious error of weeds. On the contrary, it is right and logically proper that there be no discrepancy between what is first and what is last and that we reap, in the increment of wheat from the wheat of instruction, the fruit also of dogma. And thus, although in the course of time something evolved from those first seeds and has now expanded under careful cultivation, nothing of the characteristics of the seeds is changed. Granted that appearance, beauty, and distinction has been added, still, the same nature of each kind remains. May it never happen that the rose garden of the Catholic sense be turned into thistles and thorns. May it never happen, I say, that darnel and monk's hood suddenly spring up in the spiritual paradise of shoots of cinnamon and balsam.

We must most studiously investigate and follow this ancient agreement of the holy fathers, not in all the lesser questions of the divine Law, but certainly and especially in the rule of faith. . . . But only those opinions of the fathers are to he brought forward which were expressed by those who lived, taught, and persevered wisely and constantly in the holy Catholic faith and communion, and who merited either to die faithfully in Christ or to be killed gloriously for Christ. Those men, moreover, are to be believed, in accord with the rule that only that is to be held as undoubted, certain, and valid, which either all or most of them have confirmed by receiving, holding, and handing on in one and the same sense, manifestly, frequently, and persistently, as if by a council of teachers in mutual agreement. But whatever was thought outside of or even against the opinion of all, although it be by a holy and learned man, or although by a confessor and martyr, must be removed from the authority of the common and public and general opinion, as being among his personal and peculiar and private views. In this way we shall not, as is the sacrilegious custom of heretics and schismatics, reject the ancient truth of universal dogma, to pursue, with great danger to our eternal salvation, the novel error of one man.

225 posted on 05/02/2010 4:08:27 PM PDT by Leoni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: svcw; Natural Law; Elsie
Of course as long as you explain what it is that you mean by the term.

I think the more appropriate term is LINK, if our fair NL desires to identify these things, it is VERY common to link. Though I wouldn't hold my breath for any forthcoming.

226 posted on 05/02/2010 4:09:45 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla; svcw; Elsie
" if our fair NL desires to identify these things,"

Is this supposed to be some kind of cat and mouse game in which you send me off on an internet scavenger hunt trying to prove that there are anti-Catholics proliferating every Catholic topic thread? I'm not playing those games.

227 posted on 05/02/2010 4:22:27 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla; Elsie; svcw; colorcountry
I just wonder how "by these fruits" are almost always meant as an insult on the Religion Forum? I don't recall it ever being use as in "the fruits of your labors are GOOD!" do you?

Matt 7:17 "Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;"

Of course, the ones quoting Matthew are usually boasting of how they "Love my Church". :D)

228 posted on 05/02/2010 4:39:20 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (You have body and you have fat, your ratio 1 to 1, two bodies, your ratio 2 to 2. See?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Is this supposed to be some kind of cat and mouse game in which you send me off on an internet scavenger hunt trying to prove that there are anti-Catholics proliferating every Catholic topic thread? I'm not playing those games.

You are the one posting that such exist - as the one making the accusation, the onus is upon you to provide the proof rather than dancing around the circle. If you make the accusation - at least stand by your words, or don't play those accusative games.

Incase there are memory difficulties, please refer to post 171 of this thread -

Who cares and what difference does it make? I have a number of LDS friends and neighbors that are far more decent and "Christian" in their behavior than many of the so-called mainstream Protestants and Evangelicals on these threads.

Your call to make - but crickets seem to be chirping.

229 posted on 05/02/2010 4:39:46 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Elsie; svcw; colorcountry
Of course, the ones quoting Matthew are usually boasting of how they "Love my Church". :D)

Indeed.

230 posted on 05/02/2010 4:40:57 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Ok, nature. I just want you to tell me what you mean by Evangelical and Protestant. That's it. Even if you mean Protestant as not Catholic fine, just let me know. What do you mean by Evangelical?
231 posted on 05/02/2010 5:42:14 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: svcw; Natural Law
Ok, nature. I just want you to tell me what you mean by Evangelical and Protestant. That's it. Even if you mean Protestant as not Catholic fine, just let me know. What do you mean by Evangelical?

Oh, sure. Then, whatever NL posts, it will be wrong. Stupid game.

232 posted on 05/02/2010 5:45:57 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
I love the Church.......strange phrase really. At church (notice not capitalized) today, not once did anyone in song or word say “I love my church”. They said things like, “I love being in the presence of God”, “I love the Body of believers in Christ”, “I love Christ”,"I love these people", “Hallelujah”, “Praise the Lord”, “Springs of Living Waters”, a few people yelled "whoopee".......you know stuff like that. “I love my Church” (notice capitalized) nope.
233 posted on 05/02/2010 5:50:41 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Natural Law
Ok, Judy whatever you think.

I do not know or have I ever known what people mean when they say Evangelical. I do not know what nature means when he/she uses the term. I can surmise Protestant means not Catholic and even then do not know if thats what nature means. There are no wrong answers. I might question the definition when I read it to get clarification but it can't be wrong because I don't know what nature means by it or you for that matter. So if you would like to tell me what you mean that would be fantastic.

234 posted on 05/02/2010 5:54:54 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: svcw
I love the Church.......strange phrase really.

It's "I love MY Church"....which makes it even stranger still. "The Church" might indicate the larger body..."MY Church" is exclusive.

235 posted on 05/02/2010 5:55:51 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (You have body and you have fat, your ratio 1 to 1, two bodies, your ratio 2 to 2. See?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: svcw; Judith Anne; Natural Law
Found these definitions on an Internet dictionary site:

Is this what you mean?

Protestantism is a major constituent branch of contemporary Christianity that contains many denominations with varying practices and doctrines.

Evangelicalism is a Protestant Christian movement which began in Great Britain in the 1730s. Most adherents consider its key characteristics to be * A belief in the need for personal conversion (or being "born again").

236 posted on 05/02/2010 6:02:29 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

You are correct. I would edit “I love the Church” to “I love MY Church”, if I could.


237 posted on 05/02/2010 6:03:39 PM PDT by svcw (Habakkuk 2:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
The rules of this forum prohibit me from naming names, but to those who frequent these threads they are familiar.

Oh?

I've not seen this. Could you post it for me?

238 posted on 05/02/2010 6:21:02 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
Is not a tree known by its fruits?

Lot's of folks would say those are vegetables.

One must be VERY specific in these threads...

239 posted on 05/02/2010 6:21:45 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
I was referring to the impostors, posing as Christians.

Dang!

How do we tell the difference?

240 posted on 05/02/2010 6:22:26 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-317 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson