Satire and Sarcasm

Chasing Hats ^ | July 18, 2002 | Joshua Clark

[delacoert]

Is there a Biblical case for satire? When referring to theological opponents, is it acceptable to use such derogatory terms as “fundie,” “papist,” or “orthodust”? Are such books as Nathan Wilson’s Right Behind and Doug Jones’ Mantra of Jabez appropriate parodies of evangelical books? Or are all of these improprieties in criticism, tending to further division in the Church, drive people from whatever position is being defended, and portray a general picture of Christianity devoid of the love of Christ?

Opponents of satire and sarcasm argue that the mockery behind such monikers and books is not grounded in the love of Christ that is best manifested in charity toward enemies. They say that such ridicule is entirely against Paul’s command in 2 Cor. 6:3 to “give no offense in anything, that our ministry may not be blamed.” And in addition, they say that such sarcastic remarks about theological opponents ignore the fact that we are still brothers in the Lord despite doctrinal differences, and thus a spirit of sectarianism is promoted rather than a spirit of unity in Christ.

While there definitely are perversions of satire that are intended only to stir up strife and dispute, you cannot toss out the principle of Biblical sarcasm just because of its perversions. This is akin to the argument that Christianity is a sham because there are hypocrites calling themselves Christians. Just because there are fake diamonds being manufactured and sold as genuine doesn’t mean true diamonds don’t exist. And so offensive satire should only lead us to seek out what Biblical satire looks like.

Tremendous insights can be gained by looking at Christ’s diatribe against the Pharisee’s in Matthew 23. In vv. 24-27 Jesus says,

Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.

This passage and the rest of the chapter show that the Christianity of the Bible is not always as “nice” or “kind” as we would like. The “love of Christ” is not so warm and nonconfrontational as is commonly assumed. Rather, when there is an antithesis between two groups of people, mere intellectual wrangling can rarely resolve the conflict, and often more inflationary language is required. Christ used this method of caricaturing to show the distinction between His followers and the “blind guides” and “whited sepulchres” that were the scribes and Pharisees.

Also indicative of this sarcastic spirit are the references in the Psalms to laughing at your enemies and having them in derision. The image of Christianity presented in the Psalms is one both of praise to God for preserving the lives of His saints and of prayers to God to cut off evildoers and judge the wicked. Take Psalm 52:6-9:

The righteous also shall see, and fear, and shall laugh at him: Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength; but trusted in the abundance of his riches, and strengthened himself in his wickedness. But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God: I trust in the mercy of God for ever and ever. I will praise thee for ever, because thou hast done it: and I will wait on thy name; for it is good before thy saints.

Such passages as this show that although we are certainly to love our enemies and pray for their salvation, we must also remember that it is God who casts down those who strengthen themselves in wickedness, and preserves as an olive tree those who fear Him. And the revelation of this antithesis between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman can at times be found in somewhat biting laughter and mockery.

Often Christians get so caught up in restraining themselves from hating their enemies that they end up thinking it is entirely unrighteous to show disdain for them or to mock them. But we find that the Bible is not devoid of ridicule for the fools, and that Christ Himself spread it rather thick on the Pharisees. In our attempts to understand how best to confront those we disagree with, we must never disregard the pattern of Scripture, as this will always lead to futility.

So we see then that sarcasm can be used righteously, but we must define the goal of sarcasm if we are to avoid the more invidious uses that hinder Christian truth. The goal of satire, as with all forms of rebuke, should be to save a person from error. As James 5:20 says, “He which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.” Rebuke in any form is a very gracious act when done with concern for the soul of the man in error.

Mockery should not be the form of rebuke in every situation, however. In Galatians 1:1, Paul says, “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness.” Never should the usage of sarcasm in the Bible be interpreted to support immediate harshness whenever a brother errs; rather, the emphasis should first be placed on a private rebuke, as this is the first step in the Matthew 18 process.

Yet sometimes mockery is appropriate. Once a person has spurned rebuke, and especially when other Christians are falling into this person’s error, open ridicule may be an appropriate way to call them back to truth. And when the object of the ridicule is the heathen and the workers of iniquity, then mockery is definitely appropriate, as they don’t even share the privilege of brotherhood in Christ. These are the people David and Christ were reproving and mocking. Regarding church discipline, 1 Timothy 5:20 reads, “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.” And this should also be the heart of any appropriate satire; that others also may fear.

So we find that there is no cookie-cutter approach to determining propriety in satire. At times it seems best to just let an error be, or to go privately to the straying brother. But at other times the shrewdest approach appears to be a public ridicule of a person’s doctrine so that others are not led astray. In order to make this judgment of suitable action, we must have a firm grasp of the basic principles and purpose of satire and then let wisdom guide our actions. If we try to lay things out unilaterally, cut and dry, then we will inevitably hurt somebody since situations are more variable than that. But if we rely on wisdom, we can have assurance that our form of rebuke will be fitting for the occasion.

In summary, we must remember that Christianity is not so limp-wristed as to avoid all mockery of wrong positions, as the examples in Scripture show that this is allowable at least in some circumstances. But we must also remember that the purpose of mockery should always be to point out error, and when mockery is causing undue offense or further entrenching a person in their error, it should be pulled back. We must constantly keep in mind that satire, when wrongly used, can be a divisive blade, cutting brethren to pieces where a simple rebuke would have been admonishment enough; but when rightly used, satire can be an exposing light, revealing error and exhorting to repentance.

So let us use satire with wisdom, and pray for such unity in the faith that satire will become entirely unnecessary.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

When people poke fun at me I usually laugh. Then again, I am a very clumsy person so I have a lot of experience. LOLOL!

[Alamo-Girl]

That sounds right to me, too, dearest sister in Christ!

[betty boop]

To God be the glory, dearest sister in Christ!

[AmericanArchConservative]

Yeah - as some may have seen by my comment on a recently posted thread, I don’t even spare the religion moderator from my caustic witticisms. But - either they knew I was right, or else my smooth sophistication went right over their head, because I was neither banned nor suspended for my sharp snark.

I seldom spare my knives or razors when it comes to deconstructing the Smith-ite theology of lies, or its co-author(s)...I’m even less charitable with the P.hony R.eligion O.f P.eace {P.R.O.P. - phony religion, phony peace... coming to you from Arabia since 632 AD}

A.A.C.

[antceecee]

The following excerpt IMHO applies to Chris Dodd.... who should be prosecuted for crimes against the people of this country:

Also indicative of this sarcastic spirit are the references in the Psalms to laughing at your enemies and having them in derision.

The image of Christianity presented in the Psalms is one both of praise to God for preserving the lives of His saints and of prayers to God to cut off evildoers and judge the wicked.

Take Psalm 52:6-9:

The righteous also shall see, and fear, and shall laugh at him: Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength; but trusted in the abundance of his riches, and strengthened himself in his wickedness.

But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God: I trust in the mercy of God for ever and ever.

I will praise thee for ever, because thou hast done it: and I will wait on thy name; for it is good before thy saints.

[Cvengr]

The more history one studies, the more one can appreciate some of the directed sarcasm in many situations n Scripture.

Take the revelation of the Father to Christ given to John. There is a depiction of Christ with seven stars in his hand.

I remember a sermon noting at the time of writing and for a century or so preceding, there were mythical allusions to Caesar and Zeus holding the stars representing the daughters of Zeus in his hand and whoever held them in his hand controlled the universe.

In the first chapter of Revelation we see He who is the first and the last holding seven stars representing the seven angels of the seven churches in His hand.

Without adding or taking away from Scripture, it might be easy to see how such a revelation to a worldly person of that day simply assertively represents God controls the universe, not Zeus.

[Tax-chick]

Yes, exactly. And don’t forget, “The President gives the Prime Minister a set of DVDs that work only in the US.” Columnists keep having to repeat, “I’m not making this up!” when reporting real events.

Many times, a person will post something he considers outrageous satire, only to have someone reply with a news item showing that it’s already happened.

[restornu]

so you say...

like I said go contend with yourself.

[svcw]

The reward is the degree of glory one is able to endure and receive it.

Endure, hardly. I will not have to "endure" the Glory of God. I will Praise the Glory and be thankful in it.

[SZonian]

http://www.lookinguntojesus.net/ata20061203.htm

[T Minus Four]

The reward is the degree of glory one is able to endure and receive it.

Oil, light etc meaning what you have deposit in your spiritual bank account.

The cleaner the vessle the greater the Light one will be able to endure.

Resty, who told you this? And why do you want so much to believe it?

[Quix]

To be known and understood to whatever degree by you two . . .

is one of God’s big treasures to me this side of eternity.

To be at all understood on this issue is a HUGE gift and relief, treasure.

THANKS ENORMOUSLY.

[Quix]

My own best guess is that . . .

The RM

—considers the source, laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .

&/or

—sees it as an inconsequential ignorance about his true self, priorities etc. laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .

&/or

—figures the children have to vent now and then regardless how askew from reality—laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .

&/or

—recognizes some truth in the assertions, learns something of value and goes on without making an awkward fuss about it . . .

and/or

—considers the ignorance involved on our side too significant to bother with compared to the meager worth of the issue—laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .

and/or

—is too busy and/or tired to bother regardless of the merit of the issue and goes on . . .

and/or

—extends grace regardless because he wants grace extended to him regardless and goes on . . .

and/or ???

[svcw]

Resty what is WRONG!
That lds have to work for salvation or that lds have said on FR that you have to work for salvation?
We have been told by lds on FR that there are “works” for salvation.
Works for salvation is not Biblical.
Salvation is a gift, it is given by Grace, that is Biblical.

[restornu]

So you believe

[restornu]

There is NO work in Salvation what part don’t you understand!

[reaganaut]

Thank you, Resty.

[reaganaut]

If you say different I would love to hear it.

[reaganaut]

Remember term differences. To the LDS ‘salvation by grace’ means PHYSICAL salvation, not spiritual. Physical salvation is resurrection and an assignment to one of the 3 kingdoms.

For Christians ‘salvation by Grace’ is Spiritual salvation, i.e. being cleansed by faith and able to stand in the presence of God for eternity (LDS would say this is the Celestial Kingdom). For the LDS, this spiritual salvation is according to works, or as Resty said, what you have in your ‘spiritual bank account’.

Did you notice, no LDS has contradicted me on my above post about this?

[svcw]

I understand there is no “works” in Salvation.
However, lds do not seem to understand as demonstrated on FR on a regular basis.