Yeah - as some may have seen by my comment on a recently posted thread, I don’t even spare the religion moderator from my caustic witticisms. But - either they knew I was right, or else my smooth sophistication went right over their head, because I was neither banned nor suspended for my sharp snark.
I seldom spare my knives or razors when it comes to deconstructing the Smith-ite theology of lies, or its co-author(s)...I’m even less charitable with the P.hony R.eligion O.f P.eace {P.R.O.P. - phony religion, phony peace... coming to you from Arabia since 632 AD}
A.A.C.
My own best guess is that . . .
The RM
—considers the source, laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .
&/or
—sees it as an inconsequential ignorance about his true self, priorities etc. laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .
&/or
—figures the children have to vent now and then regardless how askew from reality—laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .
&/or
—recognizes some truth in the assertions, learns something of value and goes on without making an awkward fuss about it . . .
and/or
—considers the ignorance involved on our side too significant to bother with compared to the meager worth of the issue—laughs &/or shakes head and goes on . . .
and/or
—is too busy and/or tired to bother regardless of the merit of the issue and goes on . . .
and/or
—extends grace regardless because he wants grace extended to him regardless and goes on . . .
and/or ???